£180m....8 Mar 2012 12:34
Blazer, thanks for the reply but what confuses me is the reference to VGL. if we assume that everyone is talking about VGM (reasonable assumption) then why would we be doing the running re finance and not FSC who are presumably in a better position to do so and who will own the facility when built? It doesn't make much sense unless VGMs knowledge of raising finance results in a preferential rate for the power or if VGM are dictating the pace of the power station development. Either way surely this would have an impoact on share price and should have been reported an RNS?
I am a bit confused by it all at the moment, but still optomistic overall.