RE: Dugbe4 Jun 2020 09:25
Mixed feelings, I can certainly understand why they did it. 51% of something is better than 100% of nothing. Better to get this to the point where a mine can be developed, than not and maybe the mining concession heading towards the point it is not renewed. There is also value from fresh competent eyes driving it, and not distracting the BOD on another project. There is also no financial risk or dilution to HUM shareholders, and they probably want to get on with things which this does.
49% does seem a big cut off the project, that said it reduces our risks and also the cost of building a new mine, both from the DFS and also when the mine is being constructed. In the short term, there will be no shares issued (no need on this deal). In the longer term we give up some upside to the project, but it is now heading to production at no cost hopefully in time to catch a high gold price window.