Member Info for tomcat-14

personally... i think we’d be pushing our luck then... if we were seen to be aiding and abetting in the excessive delays that have been caused already...
had we not already agreed to the banks settlement proposals... then that would be different matter... but not now... not at this point... and in light of the arguments put forward to support the decision to revoke the suspension...

personally... i think they’d be pushing their luck if they were to do that again...

why would we lend dev the cash to mobilise and start shipping... if we didn’t want them to mobilise and start shipping...

i don’t see dev will have the option not to start shipping... there are other creditors pushing for bankruptcy to be declared due to lack of progress with the jrp...

any ideas why the last ship #5 sailed half full... they done now by any chance...

is this an indication that the ruling is now effective...
https://www.jusbrasil.com.br/diarios/documentos/1167934587/andamento-do-processo-n-2199480-2720208260000-embargos-de-declaracao-civel-18-02-2021-do-tjsp ...

from the barrel... :)

good point... and it’s stopped at the pilot station... they normally sail passed and straight out to sea... could be coming back for a top up...

sailed with just a 7.2m draught?... which seems strangely low... considering the docked hours it’s had...

4.5.2.1 gives away the location of gerald’s ore...

does that mean that it is now effective...

maybe they work on full days... or by closing time (6pm?)... 9:42pm on the 8th is after normal working hours... but before normal opening hours on the 9th...

from the link that cause posted on tue 10:25... movements for the judgement are dated 02/09/2021...

i’m clocking from the 9th as the date the judgement was registered... 7 days takes us to 16th... so we should hear either way by wednesday?...

apologies as i haven’t got a clue what it is you’re discussing... but in respect to shipping $10m net of the stockpiles... they denied the interlocutory appeal... impairing the examination of the motion for clarification... the appealed decision upheld and suspension effect revoked...

yeh... page 76 of the annual accounts... which also has the corporate structure on page 29... and the nature of business for each one on page 63... the 3% royalties applied at the msb / mining level... as i interpret it...

wasn’t the other court case sitting over christmas too...

i recently worked out how much ganfeng have paid in total... for their total interests in sonora... now that bcn have completed the funding... which is the new baseline for my valuation...

iron-ically... the next ship in was originally scheduled as an ore carrier... back to back... and is conveniently waiting at the anchorage for the changeover tide... slim chance i know... but it did take a few days for it to be assigned to amcel... 24 Jan 2021 16:51...

sorry jimb... no... i was referring to the original post in the thread... which would imply we’re missing a few tr-1’s...
ganfeng down from 25.83% to 17.41%...
hanwa down from 5.53% to 3.73%...
igneous down from 4.43% to 2.99%...
only m&g and robeco have notified crossing reportable thresholds...