The latest Investing Matters Podcast episode featuring financial educator and author Jared Dillian has been released. Listen here.
No, not kidding, and if 33% down in six months bothers you I suggest you're investing in the wrong segment of the marketplace. Most experienced dabblers in AIM will know this is irrelevant when looked at in the whole. Could be 200% up in a weeks time.
Silver, my optimism is based on publicly available information. While folk choose to listen to guzzler and the like and keep the sp low ( the 5m sells are obviously linked to an organised campaign of negativity to suppress the SP) it suits me fine, allowing buys under 0.1. I have no intention of elaborating as I have eluded to some of the reasons previously and the rest is my interpretation. If correct this gives me an advantageous position which I do not intend to dilute.
LOL, anyone remember the character played by Paul Whitehouse in the Fast Show who changed his opinion on things every time someone spoke to him? Perhaps before most on here's time.
On this point I think guzzler must be forgiven. There is no point expecting someone so manically obsessed with hatred for the company (and probably everything else in the world) to take a balanced view. His condition means this is simply not possible and he is merely to be pitied in this respect.
And then when he is made to look foolish (very easy to accomplish) he resorts to the foulest of language and threatening aggressive behaviour. As Ive said, I pray to our Lord he is a single man, the thought of anyone having to live under the same roof as this objectionable, foul, aggressive oaf fills me with dread.
There are some greedy folk around. Now that forthcoming news has been confirmed in at least two publicly available articles (if you have the wherewithall to interpret it correctly) the previous rampers are deramping to try and get a lower price than that already available. Truly terrible behaviour
Surely the real discussion should be why the chuffing heck are folk looking at an AIM start up company if all they are interested in is fundamentals? You're in the wrong place for that, this is all about potential, risk and larger gains.
A fair point roley but I tend to look at the difference between buying price and selling price as the most important thing. At an average of 0.12 or 0.1034 if bought this second the opportunity to profit is clear as far as I can see. Those who disagree will no doubt have sold.
No I didn't guzzler, hope that helps.
The majority of the shares sold at under 0.13. So I guess if this shoots up to the 0.2s in quick time someone will be making a lot of money.
By 15% of total shares issued.
Sells outweighed buys by 15% over the last 8 months. I worked it out rather than just whinging all day long.
Equates to 15% of company. No way MMs hold them so who does? IMHO this is already too many to hide so something will give soon, by the second week in June imho, and my interpretation of the known fact tells me it will raise the SP sharply.
From hiding your true holding and using it to depress the SP unless it's to keep the price low for a takeover or use the same clout to rapidly raise the sp eventually. Both scenarios spell a significant premium to current SP.
I would stick to pulling folks teeth out JD you don't have a clue and the fact you go in all guns blazing makes you look even more stupid than just simply getting it wrong.
LOL, so if you have 25 mates all owning 2% of a company on your behalf you have no requirement to declare you actually own 50% of the company. It seriously gets worse by the minute.
Again that would fall under related party rules where there would be a requirement to inform of a significant holding.
Very few IQs making it into 3 figures on here. To have the amount of shares required to sell in multiples of millions as seen recently, the owner would be required to register their holding and submit TR1 when their holding reduces or raises to certain benchmarks. The fact this has not occurred means the holder has not registered their holding as required and has hence avoided the requirement to identify themselves and submit TR1s. Sweet Mary Mother of God its like conversing with four year olds.
So thick he cant even understand that I am pointing out the sells should be reported under TR1 rules but are not. THATS the point Im making but, as pointed out before, he's thicker than mince. To be fair though he has managed a few posts without vulgarity, aggression or profanity. Miracles never cease.
LOL, Guzz sold out at a loss? In the world according to guzz, he's bought, he's sold, he's held, all the share has ever done is go down but he's even/up on his trades. Total fantasist.