Greatland's tough day out, Antipa fix beckons: Fitzy - MiningNews.Net30 Jul 2025 13:36
Takeover of Telfer neighbour makes a lot of sense in light of yesterday's $1B wipe-out.
It is not a good look for a newly arrived gold company on the ASX to be slicing 11% from its FY26 guidance and bumping up expected costs.
But that is what the Forrest family-backed Greatland Resources did yesterday, in its first quarterly report on its Telfer mine in Western Australia to the ASX, after its IPO (A$490 million at $6.60 a share) all of five weeks ago.
Throw in a much bigger forecast capex and exploration spending, and the scene was set for a savaging on the market.
By the end of the day Greatland had lost $1.1 billion of its market cap after a $1.65 a share or 24% price fall to $5.24. It is now a somewhat slimmer $3.54 billion company.
The new guidance range for FY26 is for 260,000-310,000oz at an all-in sustaining cost range of $2400-2800/oz. As recently as April, in the lead up to the IPO, Greatland's guidance was for 300,000-340,000oz at $2400-2600oz.
And in the prospectus for the IPO itself there was guidance that a two year "production target" had been set for Telfer to average annual production of 280,000-320,000oz in FY26 and FY27.
Viewed against the two-year prospectus guidance, the new guidance for FY26 is not the shock horror Tuesday's market treatment suggested it was.
The market hate surprises
As a result, the sell-off was likely was overdone. But a surprise is a surprise and the market doesn't like them.
Something clearly happed between April and this week's new guidance.
Remembering that Greatland only got the keys to Telfer from Newmont in December, a fall in expected grades during the June quarter, mainly from inherited run of mine stockpiles, emerged as a concern.
Managing director Shaun Day opened his address on Tuesday's investor call on the quarterly with a roundabout explanation on the issue.
"Let me say that our guidance is different and lower than the outlook previously provided. The reason for that is that as part of the FY26 budget process we undertook a risk assessment," the ex-Northern Star chief financial officer said.
And we felt it was appropriate and prudent to apply a risk factor to the expected grade of the ROM stockpiles, and to some open-pit material to be mined.''
"After we saw the full June quarter numbers, and that gave us multiple data points, we decided to take the decision to ensure that we were taking a conservative approach to delivering FY26 guidance," Day said.
Variable grades in the stockpiles, open pit and underground is nothing new at Telfer. It was not a big deal for Newmont and Newcrest before it as Telfer was but one of many mines in their portfolios.
Single asset pitfalls
But for a single mine operator like Greatland, it is a big deal as demonstrated by the market's savage response to the FY26 guidance downgrade.
The market did not like Greatland's growth capital guidance for Telfer of $230-260 million either. It was more than $50 million high