Member Info for thurgarton

XPB: If you check back i believe you will find that the VLS equipment was not the cause of the breakdown and that, prior to the breakdown, the site produced the expected output to the requisite standard. I take that to be a demonstration that the VLS equipment worked to the required standard.

XPB: There you go again, making assumptions based on your own view rather than actual fact. Just because Fulcrum have financed a plant in the USA (which has still to open BTW) does not necessarily mean that they can do it again in the UK. VLS tech is proven (Red Rock and Japan) and patented, despite your unsubstantiated claims to the contrary, and they have planning permission and the support of the local community, not to mention HMG, for the Altalto project.

XPB: As yu well know, this is old news (16 Feb 21 - Fulcrum announcement "Construction on Fulcrum NorthPoint, subject to planning permission and financing, is expected to begin in late 2023 and will take approximately 18-24 months to complete"). Moreover, the company has said nothing since so it is reasonable to assume that they have still to obtain planning approval and their potential market, Manchester Airport, is significantly smaller than LHR where BA is based. Given the potential SAF market, there would appear to be opportunities for both companies and it therefore calls into question your suggestion that Fulcrum are likely to queer the pitch for the Altalto project which, even you must admit, is further advanced than Fulcrum North Point and looking to supply a different and potentially bigger client. Keep working on the spelling.

Das Posten auf Deutsch in diesem Forum ist eine lästige Übung, die noch verschlimmert wird, wenn Sie nicht verwandten Müll posten!

But then again, a month ago we were at 5.10, and three months ago we were at 4.10 - it all depends on your view point. A 50% rise in three months sems like progress to me. A similar rise over the next three months would be nice, and, given the upcoming COP 26 and recent statements by HMG, is, IMHO, entirely possible.

Having been in this loop for years, I'm of the opinion that he must be being paid for what he does as nobody in their right mind who is not a shareholder in the company would waste so much time and effort in regurgitating the same old theme for no discernible reward.

XPB: Those IIs that you refer to presumably include the IIs that currently hold around 60% of the velocys shares, the majority of which (by share volume) being long term investors. Please explain your "logic".

Not you,obviously! I presume that your "logic" tells you that eveyone who disappears from this board has lost money. I would only comment that the Velocys SP has been a lot lower than the present level, as well as a lot higher, which has allowed astute traders to profit.

And where exactly is here? Obviously not an institution that encourages proof reading one's posts and using such conventions as capital letters to begin a sentence and the use of punctuation to allow readers to make sense of the text. You claim only 8 years experience of investing, I've held shares in Velocys for longer than that! You also claim that those that mock your posts "do not usually do well in shares". How could you possibly know this? I think I might invest in a draft excluder to avoid further annoyance at such trivia.

XPB: Please explain how you came up with the 5% credibility figure - did you mean to imply than only 1/20th of your posts are credible? If this is the case, I can only concur. On what basis do you believe your forecasts and opinion to be correct? The whole Velocys story is based on as yet to be fulfilled aspirations and any attempt to say otherwise can have no basis in fact, merely conjecture which, in your case, shows a distinct bias.

XPB: Since we do not know who the other winners are, it is fair to say that your latest post is pure supposition. We all know that Velocys need finance but that is history, not news. Not sure why you refer to praise and glory unless that is your view of accurate reporting by Velocys which is surely a requirement of an RNS.

XPB: Oh please! You and I have been around this board for years and we both know that one of Velocys' achilles heel has been their almost non existent PR. To suggest otherwise when the company actually has somethin positive to say, and is actually not blowingits own trumpet but rather reporting the actions of others which impact positively on Velocys is plain hypocrisy.

XPB: Sour grapes or what! It must be soul destroying having to spend your time on what, on your own admission, is a nugatory exercise concerning a company in which you have no financial interest. The only issue of interest to the majority of us is the one you never answer - why do you do it.

XPB: Struggling to find a negative comment? In case you have overlooked the fact, Velocys are already in partnership with TOYO, who have, AFAIK, already conducted trials with Velocys FT equipment. The inference that, having conducted trials, TOYO, with a very high profile Japanese consortium as partners, are proposing to proceed towards a commercial project would seem to anyone but a professional pessimist to be good news.

Only two posts in last 30 days, and both negative - could it be that XPB has dual identity. This was posted on HAYDN board:
We must consider the recent year or 18 months, the hype over renewables, sustainability and tech then we can see that the price @ 1.5p then the consequent rise to 9p, the crash back to 2,7p and the up and down staircase of trading since, is all part of the Hype Cycle, which is now over.

Personally I don't see the value in the cmpany at these levels. Nothing new has really happened to this very small company. At current levels it's massively over priced from it's earlier 1.5p.

We could argue the action has already happened on this one. I see this up and down game continuing down until exceptional News from the company can hold it's price. Though I do anticipate it fallingl over the next 12 months back to 2p.

XPB: You still haven't answered the qustion everyone asks - why do you persist in posting on this board when you have no financial interest in the company? It would appear to be a nugatory exercise.

XPB: Analysis? Analysis based on your opinion with little basis on facts and a great deal based on your personal animosity. At least enlighten us as to why you waste so much time and effort making baseless negative comments when you have no financial interest in the company.

XPB: And your comment is based on what information exactly. There has been no announcement by Velocys of any grant funding being received no has there been any announcement with regard to funding. I would venture to suggest that your comment is based solely on speculation coloured (as usual) with your well known and frequently expounded negative view of the company.

It is if you are trying to make a negative point!

I think you will find that this is last year's news.