RE: Rudyard Background9 Dec 2024 13:56
Tiburn, not assuming anything, but have a point of view which was proved right on Amsden. Actually I don't know why you continue to post copy and post "PR blurb". Doesn't exactly mean anything. Is that what you are basing your evidence for success? Remember all that was being said about Amsden beforehand? Exactly, case closed. Rudyard is not actually very big in the scale of things and the figures even it the PR Blurb" are not exactly screaming at you. What is said on Weil site is very limited about Rudyard actually, and a "field" is not a specific well! Plus perhaps you can answer why they didn't/are not drilling themselves if it is so good?
However, I am sure you will continue to get your "likes" which is probably why you keep doing it.
With Charles not even having a crew on site yet let alone starting a clean up and retesting, if it flows. and Flathead quite a way in the distance for sure, you relying on Rudyard or it is going to be a pretty miserable Xmas. I hope not for the sake of investors here.
Me? I could say I am in and trading (as have said in the past several times) as it is so easy to make cash here. The drop will inevitably come tomorrow as traders take their profit leaving a few more excitable PI's spiked.
Whatever I say you not going to believe me, so........
and imho will continue to be on certainly Charles and if ever get around to it, Flathead.