Our live Investing Matters Podcast Special which took place at the Master Investor Show discussing 'How undervalued is the UK stock market?', has just been released. Listen here.
TBOB you obviously mean Bigfathead, wolfturd etc as well I assume looooooooool
Feck me! resident troll sham189 *(appropriately named) pops over from upl. The crew on here calling for reinforcements lol bang, gone, into green box with the other mad frogs.....watch out for wolfie in there, sidling up, feelin ya bum lol
Is this a record breaker weekend? sea of green (sick?) mostly lol
Friendsps mate, you need to give up arguing with these cesspits, you will get nowhere, they are immune to it. Trolls are trolls no matter what part of social media they appear on. Some just do it because they are twisted individuals who get their kicks winding up decent folk and revel in others losing money, problems, misery etc. They are the lowest of the low, like the wolfturdman. Others do it to play up their, or their masters, shorts...........or simply to try and trade on a SP dropping/rising...they are immune to reasoning and simply twist facts, half truths thrown in with outright lies, a bit of smoke and mirrors, anything to confuse the real facts and scare PI's into selling. They are scum!
I see you replying to one of the biggest fantasists not only on here, but the planet. Yes the wolfturdman. Seriously you think this non entity has EVER held a share here, let alone trade? Think again...fantasy, upon fantasy, think more of them as someone in a dirty string vest and grubby Y fronts, big pot belly, terrible BO, rotten teeth sitting in a bedsit with nothing better to do, as got no job or life, spending hours a day trying to get some attention on an anonymous BB.
The wolfman is one of the most passive aggressive entities ever encountered. Specialises in sidling up to the unsuspecting and pretending to be on their side against another holder. School ground stuff really. unfortunately these entities roam the ether world like a really bad smell, or crabs, they can be super hard to get rid of. Shame there isn't a cream to rub on them sigh.......
Best advice mate, green box them like most decent posters/holders do. Then you can just picture the grubby little trolls leaping up and down stamping their troll feet with steam coming out their ears and have a good laugh. That's what I do with wolfturdman, can just see, and almost smell, the horrible little troll in his dirty Y fronts hopping up and down now loooooooooool
Bfdinvestor, great post, short, succinct and FACTUAL............this whole drama and SP drop has bee Manufactured, that much is bleedin obvious.........not the first time here is it? If only like the US then a few of these culprits would be cooling their heels while awaiting trial! The message from the Company/BOD as always is any news worthy of it will be in a RNS. Some folk on here have always been of a wrong opinion that they are "entitled" to know every facet of a business because they own a few shares . They are NOT!
A minor dispute, yes, it is minor, just because a snarky firm has issued a WUP doesn't make it less so! Does NOT have to be put in a RNS. The company were forced to because of the manufactured market reaction to rumours. Don't think they don't know who started it, they do. Don't be surprised if there are consequences down the line for certain individuals.
BOD should have just have complained to the Law Society and let them sort it out. Any Judge would just throw it out on application if that was the case awaiting outcome of the Law Society investigation. I know, been there and done it with as said before outcome being the costs were halved and NO Law firm would then challenge Law Society's opinion on it
Quick peak to see the usual weekend trash posting all day and night.....sad people
Spikeyj, hmmm isn't that one of wolfyturds/hairyharris etc monikers? I reckon so, pathetic. As is your knowledge of NOMAD/procedures! Into the green bin with god knows how many others!!!
Usual lies and stupidity from the Bigfatturd crew simple lies, twisting facts, BS etc to try and get a rise, try to confuse holders, try to scare holders etc. Sad, sad basturds who eventually will get what is coming to them in life..........Karma baitches and out from me.
CS doing his job, statutory requirements to all shareholders including challenging and costs that "advised" are not kosher. WUP just a scare tactic joke which Judge will no doubt take short shrift with, not that it will ever get to court.
Money in the Bank, VAT returns, concentrate etc etc......insolvency looooooooooooooool they have plenty to get through to a sale which any blind fooll can see is the plan.
Just hold, or sell, or even buy, your choice live and die by it but whatever you do don't listen to the vindictive bile and toal nonsense that comes from the ever growing deramping boiler house kents!
Bigfathead, thought I had you one filter, but hey, quickly remedied after this reply to your usual dibble!!
The use of the word "shortly" is not misleading as the length of time it conveys would differ from person to person. You would never see a RNs stating in "3 weeks" or anything similar. IN ANY COMPANY! It is that simple. So a simple person such as you should understand?
Re Queeld, there is NO delay from the comapny issuing a replacement certificate. Get at least some FACTS right? Queeld have "apparently" lost theirs. They don't want to pay the indemnity (ahem....they will have to)..........besides as I said why are they so desperate to get the shares (certificate) back if they are as worthless as you and your crew make out dummy?
Your words loooooooooool " the other majority shareholders being various brokers holding shares for pi’s under nominee agreements"........how to prove you are thick room 101 looooooooool I can't even be bothered with a reply to that inanity ffs!!! Oh and AC held peanuts and we ALL know the story of that and how the SP rebounded.
So bugfatdunce go back to school child good byeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
One last point that seems to escape the grasp of the mentally challenged like biggest wailing cry baby on here, Tygra, and all the green boxes............is that a RNS is a legal announcement, to lie, mislead etc would most certainly end in a court case. That is why NOMAD checks all very, very carefully, they have plenty to lose as well if it is not factual. So to suggest that CS is not telling the truth is indeed libellous and any person would have to PROVE that in a court of Law. Yes, even on AIM. Of course RNS can be worded in ways that can be a bit confusing, could be read in different lights, that is a million miles away from saying someone is lying! So if CS says that is when they were informed I am pretty dam sure that is the case. Have a good one guys, green boxes, wolfeyturd and the rest go wash your string vests, phew!!!
Just back in UK, never saw RNS until just now, jet lagged and got to detox lol, but gotta say...................seems like a load of green boxes spending their sad weekend playing tag, yep all pretty childish........
Does stink of an engineered plot by a certain person to drop the SP though I have to say. Yes, I do know that person and think even some green boxes may have it right, for once. But then again even a broken clock is right once a day.
CS has a statutory obligation to protect ALL shareholder interest no matter how big, or small, the sum. He is simply doing his job, his legal requirements!
If he is "advised" that some "try it on" firm (NB "advised") is over charging then he MUST challenge it......that simple! Storm in a tea cup as others have pointed out. It WILL be settled before any court case, guaranteed imo........
Should have just taken them to the Law Society as I did when Executor of a Will and some snotty, arrogant Twickenham firm thought they would chance their arm. Not with me, and I wasn't a beneficiary. However, the outcome was the bill was HALVED! Were they happy? No, But they had to accept it. Was I happy? Dam right. It was the principle rather than the amount. The bigger the Law Firm the bigger the Shysters, imo of course..........
Does anyone seriously think Eurasia would be wound up over this? If you do then you need serious therapy lol.
Does anyone think the major share holders would let this go under (no chance anyway) without protecting their interests? That includes Queeld! DS could cover this with chump change ffs!
Perhaps ask yourself again why so many of the major share holders have never sold. Why Queeld are fighting so hard to get their share certificate reissued etc etc..............
I will tell you why because this company has several firms doing DD, one completed and several at different stages. Several NDA's, over varying time frames, all still applicable. You think they are there for no reason? You think the BOD can comment on anything regarding these at this time?
Hold your nerve, just as if previous "manufactured" drops in SP. It could take longer, but I will still be here however long it takes. IMO I still expect a positive update before end of the year to a BRICS country, ahem, China...............see you soon the genuine folks
Last post for me, England boring as usual........I have spoken with CS, I know how much he wants to retire, but I also got the very strong opinion of his desire to see this through..........for everyone..........man of principles!
Jeeeeeeeez!!! is that freakin fool wolfe still drooling on? That guy/gal has seriously lost the plot looooooooooooooooool
Friendsp have a good one, and all genuine share holders. Let the looney tunes brigade led by the uninvested, obssessed, no life loser...........wolfie dribble at each other all weekend as they usually do.
Friendsps try hairyharris and dogwithfleas plus several more for the nob
Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak. Ahem Wolfie dearest ;-)
Outofreach re "amended particulars of claim", filed yesterday. Sounds a bit desperate a day before pre trial imo. Or are they trying to drag it out as Defence has no time to answer?
Seems to me from following timeline MiSpare and Queeld been ducking and diving a bit, amending claim along the way, which suggests not a lot of confidence? just imo......
Can't imagine Judge be to impressed at Claimants leaving it so late in any case whether it has merit or not........
Was thinking of a buy in here but that clown Fr J H is enough to scare off any investor!!!!
Outofreach yes, but you often get them right up to hearing as new "evidence" tried to be imputed. This is what counts for today anyway GL
Hearing
12 Oct 2023 09:30 PTR
Robin Vos sitting as a Judge of the Chancery Division.
The Rolls Building, court 9.
With a flurry of green boxes suddenly I expect they are reacting to my post. Well then, good lol! Anything that rattles them is good.
However, one has to think why do they not just filter me, as I have done to them? Bit obsessive there lads, and lasses B1II, don't you think?
Actual any honour they try to get me banned and my posts removed. Shows how much I am inside there heads. Crack on, boys and girls B1II. GL and good health to you, seriously.................lol
Wow, green boxes seriously rattled lol. Managed to get posts taken down as soon as posted today. Careful you don't upset the negheads, they work to try to get posts removed and you banned. Still that is their level and we all know who the chief culprit is don't we, lambsie matey xx
Anyway as said there is a possibility the case could be struck off today at Pre trial for many reasons if the Judge thinks it has no chance of winning, evidence not factual enough, frivolous etc.
I would have thought a firm such as Simmons and Simmons would have advised to settle if they thought we couldn't/wouldn't win. We are defending our position as the BOD have to protect all share holders. It is up to the litigants to PROVE their case! Hmmmm now who lost their share certificate? Who won't pay indemnity for a new one?
We will see, if I was in London today I would have gone and sat in put will keep an eye out of any result, or not.
Claimant
1. Mispare Limited Joseph Hage Aaronson LLP
2. Queeld Ventures Limited Joseph Hage Aaronson LLP
Defendant
1. Eurasia Mining plc Simmons & Simmons
Robin Vos sitting as a Judge of the Chancery Division 10:30am The Rolls Building, court 9 Pre trial review BL-2021-002213 Mispare Limited and another v Eurasia Mining plc
negheads, please don't cry and getting posts remove shows desperation looooooooool
Outofreach, you are absoutely correct. In this case the Judge is likely to say feck off MiSpare, you lost your share certificate now follow the rules and stop squealing like a Eua BB neghead!