RE: Re: An interesting read17 Oct 2018 01:25
I was replying to Bobtree's comment "Apparently, in a separate reporting the Greens only made the 4% cut off for representation because of tactical voting by other party's supporters."
Yes I know they lost seats Suzy, but then he says "They must really HATE the other groups to vote for the return of the stone (or is that stoned) age." Hence the de-facto comment.
Too early to say its 'not just like old times', but if they are part of the next government then IMO it will be, like I said they will have a voice. Admittedly a smaller voice but nevertheless they will have some input, enough to give all the objectors support. More importantly it will be seen as support from government sources which wouldn't be the case if they were not part of the government.
I believe my interpretation of the Jokkmokk governing body was correct in that they will not be involved in the decision making process, unless it all goes on yet another merry go round.
We have been led to believe that the final decision is with the government, unless the election changed this so called process.
In this instance I can't see how the Jokkmokk governing body matters, everyone has had their say, if there are any opinions required from Jokkmokk then everybody will want more input.
As I said its only my interpretation, probably completely wrong but we will know before the end of October if Loefven can form a Government, with or without the Greens, preferably without.