Member Info for TheBugle

Nda or other privacy document is not unusual. Rest sounds like a rubbish Ponzi scheme

Might need to pay up and look happy

Typo:
Should read “Market can be very unforgiving”

MIT can be very unforgiving

The extended message with so many pros always makes me suspicious…but too much talking up here maybe ??

It does feel sometimes like ESG is killing this old world stock via a thousand paper cuts. I might have mixed metaphors but younger the gist. Is it worth balancing it off with some more pro ESG as an offset?

Really useful info. Thanks

“Bring me the lucky generals” - Napoloen

Positive RNS out this morning, announcing the new partnering of Love Island star to help promote skinny tan. Seen it highlighted in the Sun and Daily Mail already. Should be a great boost to sales and market interest.

Careful not to spread false covid information ??

That’s a real roll call of failed companies. I assume your shareholding wasn’t the only thing they had in common ??

My biggest concern is that I’ve seen so many adverts for it now, I might have accidentally seen the whole movie already.

Agreed. Very useful

Hey ShandyPants,
I agree, it’s a decent update and we should probably recognise it’s a corporate update as opposed to a trading one. From a rules perspective, I believe that means they are only allowed to update on items that have seen something change and not just update on revenue gains etc - although could be wrong.

If it was a trading update and they didn’t mention nuthing and roots that would be more of a concern for me, although to be fair the primary focus is undoubtably on Skinny Tan as that is where they are going to see the most benefit.

It looks like management know that Skinny Tan is the product that will move the dial faster than the other products. They can only do so much at once, and judging from previous RNS updates, there appeared plenty of fixing to do after Bayer’s disastrous reign.

The helmets weren’t cheap, but that didn’t mean they worked. You haven’t been able to buy one for ages (well over a year) and the website is a basic holding page (it even asks for a password which is strange). I think this is another “great idea” that the previous board had but then just wasted money. Before and after pics are easily faked - if a device like this worked then people wouldn’t do invasive hair transplants. My opinion is that it is probably snake oil being peddled by Bauer. If it worked they would have sold the IP.

I can’t remember who the awful life sciences guy was but he didn’t seem to have a clue.

It would be great if they had a broader product range, although I’m glad they now have the focus as opposed to just buying products and letting them die.

I’m not sure Charles + Lee has a USP - there aren’t many grooming brands that really do. It’s a sector which differentiates itself through marketing, hopefully the new focus on influencers will help the brand but at least the adverts for C+L aren’t as awful as adverts for ST have previously been.

Someone bought almost 3% of the company in one trade on Friday, if that’s an existing shareholder then we might see a tr1 next week.

If it’s an insider it’ll show real confidence in the future - fingers crossed!!

Joe’s “steady hand” sent the share price from £4 to £0.60 and less. He had to go and it is good news they have moved fast to remove him completely.
The new team (all now in the same time zone!!!) will be able to work faster and more collaboratively to help move this company forward.
It is a good company with some great products. Now they have removed the failing old leader, I am confident the new leadership team will drive value and grow the share price.

Even bigger buy today with ~171k. Someone has a very good feeling about this company which is always exciting to see. Was the announcement of it delayed to after close simply due to the size?

Never too early to take a profit surely... except for the guy who sold his pre-ipo stake in Facebook

Liftoff

Interesting. Also recent reports of immunity not lasting long. Don’t know if that hurts vaccine companies, or helps them more as they sell a product that has to be re-purchase more frequently

I get your point. But I’ve never bought milk from a cow. Hard to find any business without a middle man of some sort.