Member Info for TheBeastofBodmin

Totally irrelevant the accounts were RNS’d.

Voted for all resolutions as still get to get a cognitive reason as to why changing CS or BoD is going to change anything other than ‘any of the current BoD could take over’ which defeats the object entirely as they are aligned with current company objective?

And spend all weekend on the bb despite waxing lyrical how interesting, clever, qualified they are…subsequently label anyone invested as being part of a crew despite them posting multiple X more posts than the ppl they label?

Extremely weird behavioural traits which has resulted in….no one paying a blind bit of notice 😆

Dear me Toffers have a day off FFS it’s pathetic.

Magnum that’s purely your opinion, like myself you don’t know the safest option as you do not know the full facts.

That ‘option’ is always a possibility this fiscal year depending on SH’s voting for the option and the company considering it necessary, the question should be what for?

As for previous raises the company raised via ii at 26p this raise enabled the drag line and power commission at WK and we also see a further loan out of over $15 million to the various subs.

This was a successful raise by the company at a huge premium to todays SP.

Yes TC as you well know a raise was not necessary for the past fiscal year, which is what you have been claiming since last autumn and did not occur.

The new AGM will represent a new fiscal year, subsequently the ‘option’ to raise is in the AR.

Is there anything else you are struggling with? 🙄

2 weeks ago you were informing everyone to sell up as the company would not get their accounts audited.

No clearly others are capable but given the region we operate and current political climate you need to be careful here, I don’t think some consider the hoops we may have had to jump through to still be trading you also need to understand the management sense to already have EUA in subs and banking arrangements in place.

It is also clear EUA have a positive relationship within Russian mining authorities have you considered this and any impact of change?

Anyway your vote your choice I’m voting for CS.

Somehow not seeing an improvement on that suggestion? 🤔

So who do you want to take over?

It’s all very well shouting and screaming for change but you need a constructive plan?

What’s your plan if you remove CS?

Change to what precisely given the current geo political storm and the location of the assets what and who are you considering changing too?

I can assure you I am not duty bound lol 😆 I just don’t see what more he can offer his part was WK EPC the DFS and in that regard he has delivered potential for sale IMO?

I would like to see the DFS result too and also the resolutions will need to look at these in more depth before voting but overall feel positive post the AR this week, but we are in rocky times any escalation to the madness could compromise any forward plan?

What is strange about the CEO who specialises in EPC leaving having completed EPC at WK and DFS completion at MT?

What exactly is left for him to do?

What is strange is people appear to want the ex CEO to continue to collect a wage when he’s got nothing further of value to offer while moaning about director wages?

Of note to remember the initial FS approval for Monchetundra back in 2017.

These incorporated studies by EUA and the owner before Anglo American platinum.

Information available in regards to this data and personally fully expecting the DFS to show us an equal or better prospect for mining if released?

IMO

https://www.mining-technology.com/news/newseurasia-mining-gets-approval-for-maiden-reserves-at-the-monchetundra-project-in-russia-5831099/

No but have seen it as others have here.

Going about their business, achieving milestones, not being pressured into panic mode or fire sale.

Any thoughts on the HW Wainwright report?

So no comments in regards to the HC Wainwright analysis of EUA’s assets?

Have you seen HC Wainwrights report and do you consider their input to be of substance?

Why are the derampers continually talking about the ACF report?

Clearly you appear to recognise the qualities and authenticity of Iain Rawlinson?

Do you also recognise the same virtues in the company HC Wainright who also concluded their individual report on EUA’s assets?

Or do you consider their independent research and release as worthless as ACF, and why have you not managed to cross reference the ACF report with the HC Wainright report to assess a more balanced opinion?

'Funds not hidden away in Cyprus then... That’s another AIMO down the toilet 🤦'

:)

Indeed LB, well observed.

Just closing the loop. As suspected. Pg 68, 75 and 78 of AR.... Loans to subsidiaries jumped c. £15.5m in 2022.

A shade over £28m now out on loan to 'related parties'