Member Info for THE_CHAIN

Hm no, we sold the majority, not all.

And Recyclus confirmed 35 tonne a month so far, ramping up.

Debts being serviced too, not for payroll.

Laugh all you like, we are still in the game.

Https://www.criticalmetalscorp.com/news-releases/news-release-details/critical-metals-corp-nasdaq-crml-surpasses-70-completion

I think it's you who's misinterpreted it to suite your agenda Buried treasure 😂 you are very good at that.

There is no reason at all to suspect they have sold them, the last rns mentioning them was the interim results confirming 861k shares held. Nothing since, so nothings changed.

You are just a blatant scaremonger, first the shares where worthless, now we don't have them because they are worth something and that doesn't suite your last days of Rome theory now does it?

I look forward to you being proven wrong... Again.

Key points:

"size and incidence of similar transactions which the company has entered into".

We've never sold a share based payment and banked 1-2m quid before depending on when buried treasures fantasy share sale occurred. And doing so is not in the normal orderly course of business

"This factor is used to assess if a transaction is a normal part of a company's operations, rather than a special or exceptional event that would require a market notification under the UK Listing Rules."

I think most sane people would agree the sale would fall under a special exceptional event, they'd have to notify the sale and what the proceeds are to be used for.

And lastly

" Similar in size to transactions the company has done before.

Nope

Similar in frequency or incidence to previous transactions.

Nope

" Whether a shareholder could reasonably expect the company to enter into the transaction." not without being told, as many people have and will continue to make investment decisions on the basis that we own CRML shares, because we have not been informed otherwise.

For everyone to read, make your minds up, but I think you'll agree with my "grasping" diagnosis of buried treasures latest geriatric rant 😂

UKLR 7.1.6 (2)(a) outlines one of the factors used to determine if a transaction by a listed company is in the "ordinary course of business". A transaction is considered to be within the ordinary course of business based on the specific circumstances of the company and other factors. Under this rule, factor (2)(a) is the "size and incidence of similar transactions which the company has entered into".

This factor is used to assess if a transaction is a normal part of a company's operations, rather than a special or exceptional event that would require a market notification under the UK Listing Rules.

Context of the rule

Purpose: The UK Listing Rules (UKLR 7) require a listed company to notify the market of "significant transactions" and "reverse takeovers". A transaction conducted in the "ordinary course of business" does not require such a notification, regardless of its size.

Assessment: UKLR 7.1.6 provides a list of factors to help a company and its advisors determine if a transaction is in the ordinary course of business. These factors are considered in light of the company's specific situation.

Factor (2)(a) explained: This specific factor considers whether the transaction is:

Similar in size to transactions the company has done before.

Similar in frequency or incidence to previous transactions.

For example, a property development company that regularly buys and sells land for profit would likely consider such transactions to be in the ordinary course of business. For a technology company, a single large property acquisition would be highly unusual and unlikely to be considered in the ordinary course.

Other factors to consider

UKLR 7.1.6 (2) lists other factors that must be considered alongside factor (a) to assess if a transaction is in the ordinary course of business. These include:

The nature and size of the company's existing business.

Common factors within the company's industry.

The company's corporate strategy.

The accounting treatment of the transaction.

Whether a shareholder could reasonably expect the company to enter into the transaction.

You really are grasping buried treasure, yes they do develop assets up the value curve and sell them, which they have done, in exchange for shares, as announced, those shares if sold would materially impact shareholders and falls outside of that exemption.

Selling shares is not an orderly part of the business is it now? And has enormous material impact and would be directly misleading the market if not announced. You are right on one thing though, you've saved me a lot of money in education, I just have to come here and wind you up to get the answers I need 😂

I had another look, yes all fall under class 1 now which uses a 25% threshold.

So you are still wrong regardless how you try and twist the narrative 😂

For anyone else reading this what Buried Treasure is saying is absolute tosh.

The crml shares value have consistently been above the threshold, Even in tranches, if sold within 12 months of each other, the transactions would be aggregated and have to be reported.

Suggesting they have been sold and not reported on sounds like defamation to me unless you have any evidence at all to back it up?

The transactions would be aggregated 😂

Slip up there?

Going by his spelling and grammar I doubt he can read very well either, shame RNS's don't come with pictures 😂

Disagree, the company needs to be able to prove going concern for the accounts, as you've rightly pointed out due in November. As per usual you are over reaching with your negative outlook.

Now I suspect you'll suggest they've sold CRML again and not notified the market, if you genuinely suspect that, why haven't you reported them to the FCA? Even at its lowest ebb CRML was worth more than 10% of the companies market capitalisation. Market rules stipulate any transaction that exceeds 10% is a class 2 transaction and must be reported. Surely if you actually believed your own bluster you'd be having a field day with the amount of transparency rules that would have been broken, no?

I reckon so to chaps.

And no we can't refine, but Glencore will buy it anyway, and in this rush for rare earth's the price of lithium has sky rocketed.

You are a fool if you believe what you are writing.

It's not for peanuts though is it 😂

You are a joke, CRML will be worth $25 dollars a share come the DFS in October, Mark my words.

Your days are seriously numbered here wkw, I will enjoy watching the truth oust you.

I've voted for the company to have headroom.

Whilst dilution isn't ideal, I understand the need for a company to be able to raise, service debt to continue as a going concern.

Its also better to have optionality, with this we will have value in the CRML shares and the ability to raise/service debt if the rug gets pulled and we see BT's $0.65 with CRML 😂

You will see in the coming months....

$7.50 was the strike price for the pipe warrants, 4.5m shares.

It will climb back up again don't you worry. Pathetic attempt at deramping as per usual WKW, you really are embarrassing.

Wkw is a boiler room dweller, his entire posting history is deramping accross various boards.

Where are you now wkw? $7.42 as we speak. 😂

DOD funded Ucore processing facility to take 10,000mt

of rare earth a year from Tanbreez.

Next stop $7

Https://www.criticalmetalscorp.com/news-releases/news-release-details/critical-metals-corp-nasdaq-crml-secures-10-year-tanbreez-take