Member Info for The.Italian

and just in casehttps://www.futuramedical.com/what-we-do/med3000/med3000-clinical-programme/ NO PLACEBO REQUIRED IN FDA TRIAL.

and don't forget no placebo required in fda trial. good enough for fda but not the poltroon>you know it makes sense.

so not proven only to work in a clinical setting then! good now retract your former statement you weasel mouthed poltroon.

and just in case anyone has not grasped the point the FDA have not asked for a placebo to be included in its trial .NO PLACEBO!

fda trial requires no placebo.good enough for the fda but not the poltroon.

fda happy to sanction us trial without the need for a placebo.good enough for the fda but not the poltroon supply the link to support your statement about not working outside a clinical setting.supply it or retract the statement.

fda perfectly happy to sanction its us trial without a placebo. good enough for fda but not the poltroon!

we are not talking about a previous product.you stated med 3000 appears not to work in a clinical setting. there is evidence to show it(med 3000 not some previous product)does not work in the real world.post the link or retract the statement you weasel mouthed poltroon!

well you obviously wouldn't pay rent would you.be a bit like paying to go to prison!

that does not mean"only appears to work in a clinical setting" and you know it.completely different.i repeat where is the link to support your statement?provide it or retract it you weasel mouthed poltroon!

where is the link to "only appears to work in a clinical setting"?where is it?if it exists post it ?

"only appears to work in a clinical trial"is a totally misleading and distorted falsehood.no evidence has been produced to suggest its efficacy is confined to a clinical setting.this is a pure fabrication.if you disagree post a link to the specific evidence of this claim relating to fum's product.

so it's a bidding war then?

this one will run and run!

wednesday not thursday.sory.

so why present it as an apparent fait accompli when nothing has been and indeed may never ,materialise. pure negative speculation,nothing more,certainly doesn't sounds as though you are that impressed by the bod.seems you have nothing but contempt for them and to seek to suggest otherwise is risible.if you want people to take your views seriously you could at least take the trouble to construct a convincing narrative and background.

i was wondering if mamoshina had gone as not heard from her for a while.no i don't think keller mentioned young ai as such,but the talk was from a different non promotional perspective (role of women etc )anyway she is being a bit active in other spheres.she spoke on thursday at the longevity summit and is speaking this afternoon to ARK (age research at kings college london) so perhaps some promotion there.if i can get links i will post.not suggesting it's adding any value,but in the absence of other news it will have to do.

must have missed reckitt's announcement that they are seeking equivalence.can anyone post a link,or is it just more negative and misleading speculation?

next he will be saying the ce mark process doesn't address safety issues .couldnt make this drivel up.

so now we know the truth.he is the daily star reader.i knew they had one!