Member Info for The.Italian

thank you mel.im clear now.

mel are you saying that in this conversation it was stated that the bod re aware of the views,but the they do not feel the need to communicate,or is the latter statement simply your conclusion from the lack of news? iif it is the former,it is avery odd statement to make.

agreed bucolic.but at least his musings give a whole new meaning to "a touch of the vapours"!

and revenue of over $90m.madness!

fum are pursuing a de novo classification application,not the 510(K) route.

wondering if this was the conversion of the final CLN tranche?

good man ss.also re labactec it is clear from their profile that they were chosen specifically for their expertise in MENA (middle east and north african)marketshttp://www.labatecpharma.com/about-us/ looked a solid choice to me.

very interesting bignose thanks.yes can't understand why no announcement made.cannot see any reason not to.anyway good news re submission and probably means we can stop fretting about something else going on behind the scenes.

very well known generic risk warning for aim. i doubt there are many aim investors who are not aware of ,but if it forms the cornerstone of your investment approach, very few would invest on aim at all.nothing specific about naps of course,just general negativity.

they have never said"mid"2022,only 2022.this point has been referenced before,so could be earlier or later

imo it is impossible to provide any cogent assessment of the likely timing.it could be tomorrow,or it could be next year.we just can't say.i think all i can do itspoint out the obvious,that if you think it is worth investing at this level, then by leaving it to see what may happen, you run the risk of being out when (hopefully )good news lands.as i say,that is obvious,but certainly not meant as advice as i know you will make up your own mind.

well dactions, it's always difficult to decide on what one feels is the most appropriate response and i find i change my view quite often.i have to say i felt better when the filtered one was on filter,but the fact that he has started posting again with the hoary chestnut regarding patentability and method of action,a subject that was done to death ages ago, suggests to me a need to provide a suitable countervailing view.i do accept that you may see it differently.

more deliberate distortion of the point i was making.so now the filtered on is saying, first that fum won't get a patent,but if they do competitors can knock out a quick copy and presumably get a patent themselves...and all this for a product which he claims won't work! risible!

for any persons reasonably new to the board,i would point out that the filtered one's current facile observations regarding patentability are simply a regurgitation of the discussions on this point which were explored at length of, following the decision to go with med 3000. futura have a long history of successfully obtaining patents and have a large number to their name (some of course are no longer current). the suggestion that because the precise mode of action is unclear, a patent would not be granted on that ground is entirely false and misleading. it is the formulation, ie. the precise composition of the compound, which is being patented, not the method of action. of course you cannot patent a physical process such a evaporation, but you can patent a formulation,which may or may not work through evaporation etc.this is just another desperate and thoroughly disingenuous post from a poster entirely devoid of integrity or principle imo.

we don't have a position in upside,although interesting in a contextual sense.

i think we have moved on from 2005.seriously the link in the filtered one's 20.41 offering is from 2005.

ss i would prefer you to carry on.like bucolic,I've tried different approaches at different times,but what has been interesting this time,is that the exchanges have actually been very informative and whilst inevitably there is some repletion of views ,i have found the last few days quite instructive.if we had just had the filtered one's views unchallenged,that would not have been the case.excellent job on your part!

morning bignose.i have the same concerns.let us hope not.

interesting that RBBe.i was wondering how they were faring after their quite high profile advertising last christmas. will try and check out the article.

thanks for that. seems a reasonably balanced article, perhaps emphasising the obstacles to success.good to see anic named specifically.