Member Info for The.Italian

of course he's not invested.just mother example of the contempt which he holds for the intellect of other posters

yes dc,i thought it was an interesting list.i think im right in saying he is in magic media(roxi) as well.

and why standby watching it go up about 300%and then retrace by 50% or so,all the while being completely pessimistic to its long term prospects? you know it makes sense!

evening albert and others.have a look t thishttp://finance.digitallook.com/cgi-bin/dlmedia/security.cgi?csi=178012&action=deals&username=&ac=,%20,%207019701,%20,%207019701 it's interesting as it gives smaller holders don't usually hear about.i think it's accurate but happy to be corrected.looks like a **** up with the other figures. schrods had 80,471,155 shares at 31/3/21 so have sold down a bit, bu tall the larger holders seem intact.

typo!

good to see the thrust of my post so ably rebutted, by pointing out my typ perhaps you really do think i am unable to subtract 6 from 100.on the basis of your obvious contempt for the intelligence levels of your fellow posters,this is, i suppose, quite likely.

more negative noise. perhaps we will be one of the lucky 96%. my comments doe not relate to the strength or otherwise of the science,simply to the pointlessness of the remorselessly circuitous speculation and opinion

couldn't agree more 81.it completely misses the point .personally i couldn't give a large stuffed monkey whether or not they will be able to use the phrase clinically proven.they will use something and if the product proves popular that will do.everything else is just agenda driven noise really.

agreed booth.a stroke of genius!

nookie in a sense i agree with that.that's what makes the continuing radio silence so strange.i can only assume that the most draconian of company interdicts is in place preventing any unauthorised chatter, until such time as the company makes its views and proposals known.

good man bucolic! keep it up!

is it just me ,or does anyone else sense a logical inconsistency in saying (a)that the product is very likely to produce disappointing sales figures and (b) that all these other companies will be rushing to replicate it or bring out their own version?

personally bucolic i prefer a shade of turmeric! you know it makes sense! good post ss.keep it up.

all true bignose im afraid.i was very disappointed by the terms of the china deal.anway look on the bright side. young ai app now has two and a half stars review.someone( no it wasn't me as i would have given it 5) has given it 4 stars. lol!keep hoping!

booth seeks to suggest that effectiveness is not an issue with a de novo device application.this is not correct.a de novo application requires performance data to demonstrate reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness.further if effectiveness is not an issue why would the fda require a 6 month trial to ensure the efficacy demonstrated by the existing data is replicated over the longer period.if the fda is satisfied at the end of the trial that should be sufficient for most purposes.fum are of course confident that the results will be replicated.

morning bignose.agree with that and today exemplifies the problem.60k share traded.whats that?about £900? most days the volume is pitiful and this is a main market company.

clearly the lack of a placebo comparator presents no difficulty from the FDA's perspective, or else they would have required one. seems crystal clear to me.

in his 15.36 post the poltroon states that "a medical device can only be approved by a mechanical mode of action,so the onlyapproved MOA is mechanical ,via massage".this is totally false and misleading.a medical device needs to have a moa which is non Ph.I.M.that is its mode of action must not be pharmacological,immunological or metabolic.it does not mean it has to have a mechanical mod,simplynot one of those three.he further seeks to suggest that mechanical in his sense involves massage.there is nothing whatsoever to suggest this is the effective moa and his reference to massage is simply his biased and distorted fabrication.for those wishingto see how complicated are the concepts behind the distinctions between devices and non device, i suggest reading the followinghttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/17434440.2016.1224644 do not be fooled by the casuistry of booth.it is not as simple as he seeks to make out and obviously the ce mark would not have been awarded if the NB had not been entirely satisfied as to the correct categorisation as a device.

whilst i should be flattered to be though of as part of the futura marketing department(i realise its just a facetious remark designed to distract from the substance of the argument) just in case anyone might take it seriously i suggest considering the following.my posting history can be viewed by anyone who takes the trouble and i will be seen to post fairly regularly on a small number of boards entirely unconnected with fum.i have been member on lse since 2017 although my investment activities go back about 40 years.booth by contrast has been a member on lse since the 29th march 2021,since when he has accumulated901 posts, all, yes all, on fum. i leave it to other sto draw their own conclusions as to who works for a marketing dept( actually personally i don't think he works for a competitor.he may do,but he has been posting in similar vein on ADVFN under LBO for even longer,so my take is its personal,motivated by venom towards the company or one or more if its personnel/.no idea of course but its not normal is it.i intend to address the substance of his post a little later,but wanted to deal with the ad hominem aspect first.

not going to waste any more time picking through the latest farrago of cobbled together arguments,except to say the attempt to categorise med 3000 as working by manual stimulation is another gross distortion. he has repeatedly made great play of the fact that its precise MOA is uncertain when wishing to place a negative slant on matter (suggesting e.g. lack of patentability) but now professes to understand precisely its MOA so that he can make false and misleading comparisons with other products.complete nonsense. oh and just in case anyone has forgotten NO PLACEBO REQUIRED FOR FDA TRIALi normally abhor the use of capitals,but with the poltroon everything is allowed.