Member Info for The.Italian

not that it makes any difference now,but i think for the sake of balance,one needs to remember that a lot of people will have been invested here on an entirely different basis from that which has applied for the last year or so.originally i bought into a fairly novel VR company.i didn't predict covid and its complete destruction of that scenario.similarly i didn't predict the napster plan(although i had a very very bad feeling when it was announced as it was obviously weighted heavily in favour of real.i didn't predict the ludicrous N&G arrangement. i think it is at rifle facile to attribute investors misfortunes here to falling in love with a share.i have never been in love with it,although i have been overly optimistic in averaging down when pretty clearly all was not well.current losses now considerably outweigh the significant profits i made first time around on this one, so i do regret reinvesting after the gore and bt news.but it was all very different then.

horse gob,very sorry to her about your wife.im sure you could do without the news here.hope things improve.

i agree strangler.it will be interesting to see what N&G do .current average about 1.48p.i assume they have been intimately involved in these proposals and see a positive outcome,but perhaps not.

apologies londondan.i felt i might be included in that as i have been a fairly positive poster on here for quite some time.glad to know i wasn't.

not in the slightest londondan.why should i or anyone else feel embarrassed.as for being humiliated,I've never subscribed to the slightly primitive school of thought that seeks to equate the validation of ones investment opinions with ones sense of self worth.

agreed arturo.very positive sign.

absolute drivel booth.

another astonishingly asinine post by booth about the warrants.

wait for booths posts now about electric shocks! anyway on a serious note just seen the rns.yes good news.i have done well on a few positions where lombard have been involved(proactis being the last one)doesn't mean they always get it right but their involvement in dec 2019 was one of the reasons i invested.

or heaven forbid,diabetic boots!

have to agree aim higher.not sure you will get any indication though, clear or otherwise.

I've only skim read the rns(took me5mins to find the placing price)first question (which wont be answered)is how much of the new money issuing into existing investment companies and how much into new?aplogies if it is stated in the RNS.will be looking closer later

thanks ss. i expected him to twist it like that.no he still doesn't get it(or perhaps just being obdurate) but im letting it go now.back to fum perhaps?gla

try again with correct title

apologies to other posters and readers for starting this very silly line of posts by having a cheap shot at booth.waste of everyones time,but he really does provoke this type of response.probably that is part of the game.

read it carefully booth.qpq is not used in a retaliatory sense.it connotes an exchange of favours services or actions. for mutual benefit.similar does not mean the same.it does not mean tit for tat look it up in a proper dictionary,not wikipedias guide for simple,and with respect poorly educated people

as i said .no proper understanding. speaks volumes about his ability to evaluate more complex principles,e.g. relating to patents.

welt least we know booth has no understanding of the phrase "quid pro quo".lol

sorry kirito.no idea what that is and as im not the most technologically adept im going to have to hope someone can shed some light on whether it is anything new or relevant

cunis I've tried to sign in with my apple account,but im being asked to do something difficult regarding a two factor identification (nothing to do with napster its the apple requirement)and im not going near that.hope someone else can crack it.