Member Info for testpack3

Https://x.com/BobSmithMSc/status/1806600012446503311

Hi Fake. Changed yr pseudo to you now being an expert in H2. lol What happened to DrAnomoly. Strange you have MSc as your award on your X feed, not PhD. Time to own up Bob, you never had a PhD and used it to get kudos. It worked with a lot of dummies who post on here. BTW, I know that you are not into conspiracy theories, so get a little respect from me and tell those dolts Dustyslay and Thaiger what they are.

Thaiger.lol yr post;

'Wow, testpack, you've really outdone yourself here. All those points you've pulled out of thin air? Utterly wrong. And the fourth point? You've twisted it so much it fits your argument. Brilliant!'

ust the same as Dusty, no substance in your post. 'Pulled out of thin air'. All facts Thaiger. Tell me your 'alternate facts' dare you to make a tool of yourself. The 4th point is I assume about the disappearing snow in large parts of the UK, including 'cold' Scotland. How old are you , 15. Posters, if any any here, with knowledge of the '60's, '70's know exactly what I am talking about. Did you notice Dusty couldn't reply, defeated I guess, and you are his 'mouthpiece'. Some mouth. Look frwrd to your musings.

2 today, both of 213K shares, and c £150k value. At well below the bid price.!!! Someone very keen to offload. Obviously seller not a believer of market analysts. Hopefully, sale is a Warrant holder, needing some urgent cash.

Many cos. show the %age votes for each item on the agenda. EML chose not to. It would have been interesting to see if there were many dissenting, or abstentions on items.

I cannot even guess where the 'bottom' is on the sp while waiting for EIA news. It is certainly a 'binary' play now, and there must be a level at which some investors will 'take a punt'. The waiting game is dangerous since RNS can drop anytime. However, I am disappointed with myself that I bought back in, convincing myself EIA approval was slightly better than a rejection. I should have listened to my own words, which were;

'there will be ample opportunities to make good money after EIA approval. If sp increases to 15p, with a more than possible price of £2+ when mine is producing, better to buy after appro'

Fortunately, did not put the 'kitchen sink' on it. So, waiting for the 'red dot' to appear to see which side of Miffin's Bridge I end up.

Part of yr post;

'Listen, why they have been lacing the sky's for 50 years with something that looks fresh out a dust cropper'

They are con trails ( condensation from jet engine exhaust) you fo*l. As I thought, you are a conspiracy theorist. Don't believe in USA man Moon landings., vaccines are a hoax, etc. I simply shut these imbe*iles up with a question on each topic. If landings a hoax, why did Russia not expose it.? If vaccines a hoax, How many people do you know with Polio, Yellow fever, Rubella, ?. I can tell you the answer to number 2, none, zero, zilch. Why, because of vaccines.

You are a Jonny No Mates, head stuck in a PC, on conspiracy sites ( main contributors, Chinese, Russians, N Koreans, Iranians , proven fact). You wallow in self gratification that someone reads your posts and gives you a big 'thumbs up'.

Finally, dolt, you say you are in the camp of 'see it and believe it. Let me give you a clue, look at proper news channels, and see the global weather catastrophes battering countries Worldwide. Because you are not educated (obvious), you do not know the difference between 'weather' and 'climate'. Fools get confused with countries having droughts, whilst others floods, heat waves killing people, and freezing conditions doing the same. You cannot be taken seriously on any topic, period. One final point on 'see it believe it'. I was born and raised in N Worcestershire. In the Winter, we had countless days off school, sledging often, snowball fights, many sporting events off because of snow and ice covered ground, etc, etc. Snow nowadays is a rarity. But since you have your head stuck in front of a PC all day, you are not aware of this. Goodbye fo*l.

Lol.

Yr post in reply to mine;

'Jesus, just wondering how many sleeps I've had since.

Testpack3, what ever happened to testpack1?

He was much more chilled 😎'

Didn't try to answer any of the points I raised, and resorted to a not funny quip. lol

Are you a GW denier? If not, why the comment 'old wives tales' etc. There is a certain mentality of GW deniers ( DJTrump eg). Just trying to see where you are in the 'mental' state.

Dustyslay

Posts: 1,748

Price: 1.475

No Opinion

'RE: BS on here re H2 production21 Jun 2024 15:21

All I take from disaster stories, and old wives tails is a simple one.

These people been round far too long making bad investments, I'm surprised they made any real money'

So, you think GW is an 'old wives tale'. Dinosaur mentality I'm afraid.

I certainly have not said 'ban oil'. My specific comment was ban 'ICE engines' . This is where products of processing crude oil, such as diesel and petrol, are used as the fuel source for ICE. ( Internal Combustion Engine). This is the source of CO2, CO, NOx, greenhouse gases, and carcinogenic material for you to breath in, I did specifically say that 30% of all oil is in the production of transportation fuel. C4.5 Billion tonnes of oil was used in 2024. That means that c1.5 Billion tonnes was used to produce transport fuels. Since matter cannot be created or destroyed ( Law of Conservation of Mass), then c 1.5 Billion tonnes of gases ( and small amount of solids ( carcinogens) are produced. These are oxides of C, N and S. Imagine the effect on GW when these green house gases (GHG) are not produced from burning fuels derived from Oil. Of course, there are other fuels which produce GHG which are not derived from oil. eg; Natural Gas,(NG) Methane, CH4. Although there is some NG derived from oil, majority is extracted by drilling NG fields. The burning in air of any substance containing C atoms, will produce GHG. NG, it its raw state, is a far worse GHG than COx.

The remaining 70% of oil sales is used in other industries, a few were mentioned. Most of these will have a C footprint, but not on the scale of transportation fuels. There will still be a huge market for crude oil, but will be 30% less than what it is now. This will affect POO, and since everything we buy has a 'transportation' cost element, it is good for inflation figures, and the World economy.

the bod, esp. ceo, has no intention of feeding any info to us pi's. it must be aware of the comments written on 'investor boards'., but obviously has not a care in the world about them. every month, since they are all. 'working hard behind the scenes' (lol), they get their salary, pension pot payments, perks, and '**** a snoot' at us.

Swaz and Castle now nothing about H2 market and it's uses. That is obvious by their posts on here.

Swaz made the ludicrous claim that cos like Shell will be flocking to PHE test centre. lol. For your education fellas, Shell are the Worlds largest producer of dirty H2 by far. Over 90% from SRM. Shell, 2 years ago, pulled out of the UK's H2 filling stations. Reason, No market. There will be a vast market for H2, not only for transportation ( as in FCs), but other applications. eg; 1000's of tonnes pa are used in the manufacture of stainless steel, where H2 is used as a Reducing Agent. Shell, obviously, would like a footprint in the green H2 production market, but as long as buyers are happy with the price they pay now, and the colour they get, Shell will keep producing H2 by SRM. Obviously buyers are happy at the present. It has just been announced that 2023 was the year of the largest consumption of Fossil Fuels on record. No coincidence, the largest number of global weather calamities also. Will only get worse if no radical action taken immediately. The first step on this is the banning of ICE motors. 30% of all oil consumption is in the transport market. Shell, et al, are looking at , eg; Siemens Electrolysers, that will be capable of making 600, 000 tpa of green H2 using green electricity. I think it was Redhornet who posted some details from recent PHE Board meetings. The interesting one, for me, was the move away from promoting 'waste to H2' to promoting the removal of waste plastic. Something I have repeated ad nauseam on here. The fotos of the TCC are impressive, but, unfortunately, no details of size were given.( if yes, I did not see any). I am sure that a plant to handle 10x the volume of waste plastic, need not be 10x physically larger. but, will be much larger then what I thought was envisaged when PHE/ Peel were talking about the footprint of a DMG facility at Protos.

One final thought, for Swaz and CP, operating temp of DMG unit. ?

This is not a FOAK, a FOAK is the first commercial sized plant. A DMG has already been built and tested, ( unless we have been fed BS by PHE). We were also led to believe that the feedstock was transformed to a plasma. Plasma temps start at typically 3000dC. No stainless steel containment can handle these temps. WE are therefore not talking plasma temps. Can the sages of 'all PHE knowledge' shed some light on this. Thanks in advance.

Oh dear Swaz;

'"Experts predict hydrogen will become essential to transport/heavy equipment fuel as supply issues mean EVs cannot meet'

I'm no 'expert' on H2, but I have been posting this for several years ( check my old posts to verify). Fossil Fuel must be eliminated from the environment. Not only because of GW, where the effects Worldwide are increasing in number and severity, but, equally important, to rid our streets of carcinogenic materials, spewed out from exhausts. I did mention in my earlier post, specifically 'cars' are not for mainstream HFC technology, only the more top marque models. Not for everyone. You are also sadly lacking in new battery tech, Solid state bats have ranges in excess of 1000km for cars and charging times in minutes, and are 60% lighter.. For 'heavy' duty applications, such as HGV's, rains, ships, public transport, then HFC is the go-to technology. However, these consumers will do as they all do now, for their 'energy' supplies, buy in bulk for depot storage. This however brings an array of problems, both for the supplier and the consumer. Storage and transportation. In the liquid form, the most economical, because of its energy density, requires cryogenic containment. Very expensive to both acquire and maintain. Gaseous storage and transportation only requires a 'strong' containment vessel, but energy density means it is much less efficient than liquid. Individual DMG sites producing 2tpd of H2 will have limited supply opportunities, even for 'green' H2. In the ME and elsewhere, the large green H2 production plants are solar, wind powered. One in KSA will produce 600 tpd. This will be considerably less expensive that DMG green H2.. There are already 100,000 ton ships carrying LNG Worldwide. In MHO, the sales pitch for DMG is first and foremost, the 'cleaning' of our environment of waste plastic and tyres, with a self sustaining byproduct, Syngas. H2 production is, if required, a bolt on. Market economics state, 'forget the greeness, feel the price.'

This is much better posting rivaldo. Well done and thanks.

Oh dear Swaz, still not understanding written English. The conflation of Peel and NH2 is only because they both had the same spiel about joint ventures with PHE. That is the only similarity, and the one I posted about. Both you and your 'fake' amigo were exuberant at the time of the Peel announcement, something fake disagreed with, until I dug through his old dr (lol) posts, and showed him his posts. He left this platform shortly after. You should try it. Different entities, but with a common goal, and I did say, you remember, that the Peel debacle was 'schoolboy management' the day the 'deal' was announced. And so it came to be.

Alkin. I am sold on the 'idea'. Having a science background, and working , at one time, on 'high temperature materials', I have a decent knowledge of the 'problems' associated with refractories for lining 'plasma' vessels, problems exacerbated when there is an anaerobic environment. I am not a 'fan' of selling DMG for H2 production, for reasons I have explained multiple times on here before. I am enthused by DMG as a 'problem solver' for waste plastic and tyres. The syngas product can be used for heating the chamber, which is specifically what the recently awarded patent is about. H2 production is a 'bolt on' facility, and will only be relevant when there is a significant H2 demand in UK. This is sometime off. BEV's will dominate the car market, not FCEV, again for reasons I have posted on here many times.

Hi Swaz, just a gentle reminder, since you have obviously forgotten details, the NH2 Australia paper you have so thoroughly reported on, has many similarities to the blurb Peel put out, on their their involvement with PHE. That didn't end too well did it.? At least, for the present, Peel hasn't given it exclusivity in building DMG, probably the worst management decision in AIM history. I do hope, for the sake of my bank balance, that many, if not all, their ambitious plans come to fruition, but first, I would add some caution, until at least, PHE get a working, commercial DMG plant operational.

You have drunk too much 'Kool-Aid'. Clearly brainwashed, no mates, and gorges on the 'net 'conspiracy sites' for comfort. Get a life please, or better still, go and live in Russia.

Idg69.

'. I wonder if anyone on the approval committee have been buying shares on the QT?'

Looking at the sp decline, I'm sure the answer is No. However, I havn't discounted them 'shorting' it.

Just an observation Rivaldo. Early last year, you posted a research note stating sp , following reporting of FY23 figures to be 85p ( 1.7 pre consolidation) . I had a quick look at your posting history, and you post on about a dozen stocks. The vast majority of your posts are 'news' related. Esp. from research analysts. Always remember Rivaldo, that REAT pays for these notes, and are extremely favourable, biased, and are, at best, optimistic. Although having other peoples opinions on a stock can be informative, they should never be the basis for buying the stock. Do your own research is the Golden Rule. Your own research is much more detailed than reading other peoples thoughts, especially when they have been paid to express their sentiments. Just sayin.

Please remember, that the PDMR's responsible for outsourcing the manufacture of the most important part of the Company, the DMG, to a Retail Property Developer, Peel, are not serious Management material.

Red hornet. Your assertion that a White family member is selling shares. Can you please show me the RNS which verifies this. ? thnxs in advance.

Nice story. Howver it's comical. Market manipulation is illegal, and carries huge penalties, including being struck off as MM's. For the MM's to 'hold' massive amounts of stock, they must first buy the stock. This is demand, and hence the price rises, the price rise will not be a sudden jump, it will be incremental, so as MM's buy more, they will also be paying a higher price.

'Pump and Dump' is different. It is glorifying a stock after a buying spree, the Pump, and when the gullible buy on this 'wonderful' stock, price rises, then sell it.