received reply from Fox, re19 Sep 2014 18:26
my previous mail posted here.
Confirmed that only block stone will be liable to 40% GRP, then transported to new facttory for processing.
The reply to question about relationships between PDMRs at Fox, and Fox, with NWH ( Malta), received the answer non, other than previously disclosed.
I have searched every rns, and am unable to find. I ried to get minutes of AGM's on the Fox website, but non there. The relationship could have been addresses at a 'poorly' attended AGM?
Aled41 raises further good ( or possibly bad) points re; licenses. Nothing illegal going on, but at first glance, it appears that certain Directors may be using Fox as a .cash cow' vehicle, not in the best interests of share holders. After writing that, PDMR's , under AIM rules, have to disclose financial information if they are involved in activities with trading third parties of the company. If they have taken out a sub-lease on land which is leased by the CEO, then I would have thought this would qualify under disclosure rules??
T Winiforth at Sh Pr posted a buy on Fox, and attended the AGM. The Sh Pr website also showed the video of Chris at Inv Conf. I left a message for TW, asking in his DD, did he know of the relationship between R Lascelle and the BOD, and previous companies etc, etc. A message came up saying my mail was being checked before posting. Following day, last Wednesday, The video link, and previous messages had been removed. Makes you think doesn't it.
I'm sure it's not a scam, but a self confessed non-marble man as CEO,another Director went for a 'crash' course in marble and worked in a kitchen showroom. Worktops are granite, not marble. I'm sure it can deliver share holders some value, but there are more q being asked than answers given.
I will have another mail out to Fox tomorrow.
Will keep u informed. All in MHO of course n GL all.