Member Info for TeslaTrooper

May I ask why you have not traded Aym since? There has been few occasions wereby trading opportunities have occurred. As you are on the board daily and aware of the price movements it comes as a surprise you didn’t take advantage of the drop in late 2025.

This is a genuine question rather than poking fun

Very interesting indeed. Good find.

I appreciate the post. Hopefully we will all make good here.

I have little else to post. It seems market is waiting on this, and certainly getting this done and dusted may mean we can move forward.

I have not actually contemplated what happens if the vote fails... I think everyone is under the assumption this is going ahead. Removal of that uncertainty and the ability to again be able to raise finances may improve the fortune of aym this year irrespective of anything tangible.

I hate to say it but im certainly heading towards the more negative side of the posting opinions. This has been a huge disappointment for me the last 5 years and I say that not disregarding all those that held up to the 90p region and watched their profits sink back into unenviable losses (even those that got caught in the rise to 8p or so).

Perhaps faith this will come good or sheer will not to sell at a loss for those of us below 5p may one day be rewarded. I thought my average of 2.8 (ISA) and 3.6p was reasonable once upon a time. I have averaged down when funds have allowed, however like many there has to be a return in confidence here first.

I would gladly pay up to 5p to acquire more shares if I had full confidence. As some have argued when your onto something good averaging up (to a point) is sometimes better than averaging down.

The interesting point on this is govt funding was granted to rhe energise. Perhaps overly optimistic but in light of their success in Devon If Parys mountain does indeed progress with hydro pump idea does this possibly lead to funding from govt funding on the

Copper mine part also?

Again it’s an overly optimistic inference with very little evidence

You are welcome I have no idea the mechanisms at play whatsoever. From memory aym and rhenergise had agreed in principle but yes the cost of hydro pump idea seemingly to be paid by a third party.

Not agreeing with your takeover sentiments but will take the amicable reply non the less.

I may have posted the wrong link sorry. My 10 month old isnt sleeping and im on my knees juggling my business simultaneously, an elderly parent and wider family commitments.

Dont know why im typing on here but I have zero friends so got to get it out somehow. Plus the message board is hardly on point these days.

I think this is the correct link

https://www.rheenergise.com/press-release---rheenergise-success

I saw some messages on the other board so googled it and this could pose of interest for us here at AYM. regarding rheenergise and hydro pumps

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2026/jan/27/high-density-hydropower-system-generating-electricity-devon-renewable-energy-storage

Surprised this didn’t rise seemingly two bigger buys?

Looking possible.

Having a chat with someone on this topic and noticed also either yourself or other posters have alluded to this on the other board. Although I dont see it happening there being a vulnerability there. One way to mitigate this it was suggested that if Govt funding or involvement did come into play. The gentleman mentioned National Security Investment Act and the Govt wanting to keep the asset of Parys mountain within a publicly held company

I personally do not know and alot of what he said went way over my head. I thought I would mention it on the board as a topic of discussion.

Its a vote on share consolidation 10 for 1 which means your 500,000 shares will become 5000 shares, however the share price will immediately rise x 10. It means your shares will hold around the same monetary value.

Reason for the consolidation is primarily due to the fact that AYM cannot raise money via placings while the share price is below the nominal value of 1p. The share consolidation will address this by pushing the share price up to (on current close around 6-7p).

A secondary benefit to a consolidation is it restricts share liquidity. So the shares in issue will be reduced by ten from 488 million approx to 48 million. It means greater potential for the share price to rise on buying pressure (think about it kind of like supply and demand). If supply is limited and demand is there then prices rise.

A third benefit although not necessarily in this particular case is it can make a share price seem more attractive to new investors.

In the case the vote does not pass then AYM have limited options for raising money. And as we saw in late 2025 may have risk of going into administration. Voting for the consolidation secures funding and potentially beginning stages of a turnaround in the companies fortune.

You can cast your vote via your broker normally by logging into your account and finding "upcoming shareholders meetings". You will then be able to cast your vote via your provider.

My personal opinion is that anyone who is invested in AYM should vote in favour.

I appreciate your post but to my understanding they issued 46 million warrants for the £350k. Shares in issue currently for AYM is currently 484 million.

Unless im missing something?

What you suggest does highlight a vulnerability however the assumption being this does go into or close to production which would certainly see share prices at far greater levels than this and is likely to be some years ahead of us at which point most of us at our current averages will have looked to have sold most of if not all of our holdings.

If that was the end goal however why would they not have bought the shares on the cheap at say the 0.2-0.25 level when the company was in perceived distress? 100 million shares would have equated to around £250,000. If finance being the reason I'm sure they could have sourced it elsewhere.

At the same time I understand what you are saying in terms of using raises and others capital to get this to a point of heading into production. I personally dont see it though

Only exceptional cases may be in a takeover situation a holding above 1% "Takeover offer period

If the company is in an offer period under the UK Takeover Code, dealings of 1% or more must be disclosed."

However I imagine if im on 1.4-1.6% subsequent raises will dilute my holding and I will be below 1%.

I try and respond to you in a serious way. Genuinely I am an amateur investor with a good track record of success.

I would kindly request you reframe from insults.

AIM shareholding disclosure rule

Under AIM Rule 17:

Disclosure is required when a shareholder’s holding reaches, exceeds, or falls below 3%

And again at each whole percentage point above 3% (4%, 5%, etc.)

For listed UK companies, the general rule is that you must disclose your shareholding once you reach, exceed or fall below a 3 % holding of voting rights, and then again at each whole percentage point above 3 % (e.g., 4 %, 5 %, etc.). This is set out under the Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules (DTR 5), which govern shareholding notifications for shares admitted to a UK regulated market like the London Stock Exchange’s Main Market.

From memory isnt it 3%. My share holding isnt quite 9 million but just below. I think approx division is around 1.4-1.6%

Why so its around 1.6-1.8%

I believe from conversations we all had last time aym will start to get an idea in of which way the vote is going as they come in. Particularly with extraordinary votes.

Assumingly Energold has voted for which means it’s more or less a given. My 9 million shares voted in favour yesterday

Yes I saw that regarding a deferred share C. But wasn’t sure what that means?