Member Info for TeslaTrooper

May be wrong yet again. 1.7 million buy back went through this morning

I again read on other board one poster talk about the volume the last two trading days. However unless im missing something I cannot see that at all.

I may be going against the grain to majority view on other board and I will be most happy to be wrong but there has not been consistent big buying last two trading days as we saw early last week.

It may simply have been a larger private investor purchasing £100k or so shares on the bet that this may bounce. They in theory could double up from the buy in merely on a bounce. Again however I dont see why someone would risk their capital on a whim.

Think only way to know for sure is RNS comes out soon.

Yes the other board has been very positive with the movement in sp. I noticed a few posters who dont normally post came out quite confidently suggesting news is leaking or something has been agreed in the background.

If we notice the Share price prior to the Share consolidation RNS had started dropping around a week before (at the time many thought for no apparent reason). This would suggest in hindsight leaking of information then and on the same principle of logic this could be happening again however in a positive scenario.

Equally I cannot see big shareholders like Kearney letting his money go down the drain... what would be the purpose of allowing that to happen?

Was discussion on other board that shares were being mopped up today and was very little available to be bought. However I cannot see this as the trades show a bigger sell and an unknown trade of over 2 million shares which may have potentially been a buy.

Im a little uneasy by todays drop as it went up in morning and then fell back.

Comments on the other board seem mostly positive that something has been agreed in the background. And as some have said if there was no reason for a rise an RNS should be issued to say so? the "no material reason for the share price change" type RNS.

I cannot fathom any reason why there would be a sudden rise from yesterday and seemingly larger (in volume terms) buys starting from pretty much last friday.

If we were to assume all the larger buys that have cropped up since last friday is the same entity I think it works out at around £80,000-£120,000 (havent counted or noted all of them).

Even if someone was having a punt I personally would not risk £80k to £120k on a company that has not secured funding. This leads me to think its not a random chancer.

The other thing I discussed in real life which may have been alluded to on the other board, is possibly its friendly parties buying up shares to give the sp a boost above 1p. Once above 1p a raise can occur.

Its difficult to know but many on the other board are hinting at a postive RNS next week in their predictions.

Honestly Im not sure....

It’s not the monetary value but volume of shares as there are very little shares in issue.

The same happened in 2021 on similar volume of shares but obviously at 5/6p the same volume would be at significantly higher monetary amount.

1 million shares in 2021 would be around £50,000

Several more came in when I went to pick up kids from school just checked in to see had gone up 77%.

I almost added more this morning and kicking myself for not doing so.

Surely something has to be happening?

1.2 million share buy. If anyone takes a look at the other message board that begins with the letter A, the rumour mill is starting to pick up pace.

I also noticed someone did a dummy buy this afternoon around 3pm according to a poster on other board. They were unable to acquire any shares. Fingers crossed all.

Noticed another larger buy today early on over the 2 million shares level. I think since last weeks RNS this is the third larger buy that has popped up.

I say large as its not in monetary amount due to how low the sp is. It leads me to believe (more likely pray and hope) as others are saying on the other board it could be related to a certain Mr Kearney.

I also say this mostly in hope. And the reason I think this is who on earth would be buying currently with such uncertainty hanging over the company?

I myself even as a punt wouldnt be buying in right now. I wouldnt risk my capital. I was however in 2021 willing to risk large sums of capital at 4-5p based on the information at the time.

I can only summise someone with a plan is buying up shares.

Equally if someone had large sums spare and was a gambler if they bought up tens of millions of shares at current levels on the "bet" that Kearney is planning something, the windfall on that bet paying off would be immense.

I have filtered you but was looking via my phone earlier and saw my name mentioned in your post. I always tried to be fair with you especially when others made cancer jibes at you which was not right. However you are a joke of an account and not to be taken seriously. Imagine you troll forums and message boards possibly to give your life purpose.

Although the fat lady has not yet sung it is a distinct possibility that day is coming. I do not normally like to throw out stuff about wealth etc to prove a point as the small investor or individual should have as much of a say as bigger or wealthier people. I notice you whether real or not like to flaunt comments about your immense wealth etc. For myself I have invested a large sum here and although it will be a blow if it all goes, it represents around 1/5th to 1/7th of my overall investments. I can take the hit and move on. Such is life and im not one to sit on the sidelines in life.

If you are genuinely as wealthy as you claim just remember unless you inherited that wealth you were not always this way and although you may shrug off losses others may be devastated.

I recall a guy in an oiler in the mid 2000s that leveraged his home and business premises and I believe lost it all.

A big lesson for all amateur investors do not risk everything on a share. Not saying play it safe either. Sometimes the gamble can be worth it. But always protect your financial gains in life too.

With regards to todays news it was one of the reasons I was advocating holders back the proposals as without any alternative we may well be stuffed here.

That being said the rumour mill is going at a fast pace as to the intentions of Mr Kearney. And we have seen today 1 potentially 2 large buys come in.

Either way in regards to myself and AYM. It always remains all or nothing in terms of my investment. Either it all goes up in smoke or I sell when parys mountain is producing. If neither occur then in future I die with my shareholding still standing and they pass onto my kids.

Good Luck all.

Shareholders who have already submitted proxy appointments are advised that these will remain valid for the rescheduled meeting unless revoked or replaced.

Under what circumstances can the meeting be revoked or replaced? If we assume the rumours to be accurate regarding Kearney, can he put the brakes on the meeting and if so regarding a new proposal will this then be put to us all in another vote?

If anything the way it was presented was either back this or company folds. Which is why and many held our noses and voted for the proposal in the absence of any alternative. I agree your sentiment that communication on how the money will be spent if/when drawed upon was beyond poor.

Sometimes share consolidation and such a financing agreement can work to reverse the fortunes of a company if that financing is being effectively utilised. Quite frequently in a trading company with turnover but losses it frequently does nothing but delay the inevitable. However in AYM's case we are a company with no revenue but a class asset in Parys Mountain. Such money being spent towards a producing mine would certainly be a valid reason.

That being said the money total (£2million) able to be drawn upon and the timespan for a producing mine to come to fruition if all obstacles suddenly removed, the funds clearly area drop in the ocean.

My inference was the funding was to perhaps simply get to the next milestone, perhaps even some commercialisation via the Hydro pumps, possibly using the share consolidation to enable more fund raises in the near to mid future and reduce liquidity by reducing shares in issue (down to 25 million shares) potentially allowing better share stability and rises under any minor buying pressure.

This was purely my own inference (having there been no detailed explanation from the board). From my own inference I determined and still determine this is a better option to allow possible positive developments to occur further down the road.

As you said in your previous post it will be interesting to see if any further RNS come out.

Again an alternative option is preferred by myself as this play holds risks and consequences, I think the drop the share price suffered speaks volumes to how the market reacted.

Equally the rumour mill regarding Kearney has clearly been met with positivity if this is indeed the case (we cannot be certain at this point in time).

Do you think there is a scenario were he/Energold increases their stake in AYM? Perhaps to force change? This was something we touched upon when we saw some block buying post RNS the last few weeks. Assumingly one way would to be to keep mopping up shares overtime and increase his stake in company granting a greater say in matters.

Equally the confidence it would instill in existing and potential investors if he did for AYM what he has been doing for LIM. I think a reversal of fortune in the share price would be swift.

You also touched upon something significant about the mentality of such a person. Perhaps a stalwart willing to hold the line and putting skin in the game regarding LIM.

Coincidentally my fathers company was a success in the 1980s up until the late 1990s which saw rapid decline due to external circumstances. He put his own money in to keep it afloat and do what it took for it to survive. Countless of other companies in the same position folded and never returned.

Fast forward to 2025 and the company is still trading despite being a fraction of its former size.

The point being and without knowing much of Kearney (but hearing others comments on him) he may well be the captain we all need to steer this ship.

Well I think you touched upon something regarding the stability of the share price. If we go from around 1992 up until 2009 or so the share price was stable (barring one or two blips) in the 3-10p region. Post jump up to 90p or so from around 2014 until recent times the share price was stable.

I think historically this dipped below 1p twice since 1988 and did not stay under 1p for long.

However we have been sub 1p for almost a year now, the exact date being Nov 8th 2024.

All this when copper is historically at all time highs.

This is indeed potentially what you were saying previously regarding Kearney. I had a read on some of the comments on the other "board" and indeed things may be getting interesting.

Im not sure about everyone else but I share the sentiments being expressed on the other board. If some alternate funding is proposed I think I for one and majority of shareholders will back it.

As someone commented Kearney via whatever vehicle holds around 109m shares heavy losses currently, and will not be happy with things.

I voted for the proposals based on no alternative being offered. Lets see were this leads.

As in message board being quiet

I guess this is the week we will know results of the vote. Board has been unusually quiet. Wish all with holdings well. Having read on the other board there has been some viewing the capital reorganisation and the finance as a positive if the focus and funds are truly put towards advancing the parys mountain asset.

From what I could gather from those holding a positive view is still an exacerbation and scepticism that any determined path to production will be achieved.

Although this is somewhat true the share price is now higher than it was at Consolidation announcement. We are now back to the sp during the lull from end of August up until the announcement. This hovered below 1p (0.9-0.8) from Feb 2025 up until August 2025. Im wondering whether this will tick up back up to that level or not.

What boggles my mind is who is currently buying and paying on or around the ask? As an existing investor with the uncertainty on the vote outcome im not looking to risk anymore capital. If I was a new investor I would wait for the results of the vote before buying.

Does someone know something the rest of us do not? And if so what exactly? I summise a few theories.

1: The vote is going the boards way and buying is occuring with information leaking.

2: There is a third party mopping up shares for whatever reason i.e some theories put out by HawaiifiveO

3: The strength of copper prices is pushing buyers to purchase shares in what could become the U.Ks only copper mine, irrespective of all risks involved at current point.

I posted a link to a video few months back which was primarily in relation to Trump Tarriffs and the mining sector in Australia. However a small segment of the video highlighted a key point which is if metal prices continue to rise even previously unviable projects become attractive.

And here we have a great asset in Parys mountain. At what point does a bigger player realise the potential of this asset. Of what may have seen previously as a small project suddenly becomes incredibly attractive if copper prices are indeed set to keep going up and supply squeezed.

The most infuriating thing about were we find ourselves as share holders currently is we have all seen the huge potential here and at various points have taken up positions here (most of us sat in the red). I hope our time to be rewarded for our patience is coming in the near future.