Member Info for TeslaTrooper

I find your points often quite interesting as you come at things from a different outlook.

I cannot determine in your post are you suggesting such a thing in a postive light or negative?

And if you dont mind me asking with all things considered did you vote in favour for the boards proposals?

Nothing material has been presented as an alternative which is why im hoping all proposals are passed and Anglesey have access to up to £2million to hopefully further parys mountain.

In what form do you think an approach would come and in what way can such a situation bring the commercialisation of the Parys Mine to fruition?

Genuinely interested to know as if your theory is correct we may all need to make a decision in near future as shareholders.

Im wondering if information is leaking regarding the vote. I read that in strategic or critical votes the board can request updates from a tabulator at what the number of votes are.

Equally as unpleasant as share consolidation may be, it keeps the lights on.

Also the liquidity of shares in issue will be significantly decreased. If a few days of buying causes this to rise as things are now in theory this could be amplified post consolidation. Our portfolios may all be the better for it.

If the consolidation etc was to go ahead and I had wind of it now and had funds spare I would be loading up on shares now.

Also noticed the sp is almost back to were it was prior to the Consolidation announcement on 26th of sep. It would be interesting to see if this walks back up in the lead up to the General Meeting.

One thing im wondering and others may speculate or have better ideas. At what point is there an indicator internally that the vote is going the boards way?

As in are the votes being totted up as we go along? Or do they find out on a particular date? im not sure how these things work.

Spread could be high as not many shares circulating. Small buyers but are paying around or over the ask.

Voted via Hargreaves landsown today. Voted in favour just as I would rather see the funding come in to extend this thing and see were things lead to in the future. Could be a sale of labrador or indeed some revenue generation with the hydro pumps at Parys. Even to buy time to get more funds later date

Without disclosing my exact share holding I hold several million shares above 5 and less than 10.

Insightful post and appreciate a reply at such a late time of the day.

My thoughts are we going to see any indicators of this prior to the vote.

Although subject to over exaggeration and a small percentage overall I would estimate the posters on this board alone probably account for 6-10% of the share holding if you were to add up everyones shares. From what I know of my own holding along with a few other posters who I believe to be genuine, with all the others on here added up our vote has meaning.

Im unfamiliar with that boards posters but do occasionally read. The post about Kearney however throwing up issues seems a bit like a turkey voting for christmas if the company is at risk. Im also assuming the 22% is in reference to Energold.

That being said if mining lamp is correct I think we would all agree an alternative would be better and I dont think any of us would shed a tear if the management team was replaced.

All in all however unless something is offered up prior to the vote I think voting in favour is still the prudent thing to do.

Perhaps in relation to what seems to be a bigger buy on Friday afternoon, one would assume if a larger shareholder such as Kearney/Energold had an alternate plan and mininglamp is indeed correct then significantly increasing their holding ahead of the vote would sure be the way to do it.

Equally if mininglamp was correct regarding Labrador, what was the whole comments by the team previously about selling the Labrador holding?

We musnt forget Kearney was ousted a year ago (I think it was 2024 possibly 2023).

Are we Private investors caught inbetween a behind the scenes showdown?

Hey all. Not a brilliant situation at all. But I think as the guy below said we will need to hold our noses and vote for this to pass. The only way any of us invested in here get a win is a future scenario were Parys mountain is in production. Whether this is a reality or not is up for debate. At the very least we need to extend the life of things as long as possible in the hope that it does and we all make a tidy sum.

When looking into it as a hargreaves landsown user, I should be able to vote electronically. If anyone else is a HL user will we see a notice for shareholder meeting on our dashboard in coming days/weeks?

I will be voting for this to go ahead. I hold several million shares so hopefully will contribute towards this being Yes vote.

Horrific to see this drop further but good to see a blue day today.

I think the next best news we could see is a sale of labrador confirmed, will raise cash in the near term. Equally I would like to see the possible sale of Grangesberg. All resources financial and non financial directed into one sole goal of Parys Mountain being put in production.

I was speaking with my fathers old broker who has been in retirement for 2 years. I was discussing the Anglesey situation and in his opinion Parys Mountain is the crown jewels here. Run a single project correctly and correctly and if other projects were on the cards in the future a producing parys mountain is the stepping stone to do so.

Started typing this and although I may be on lack of sleep currently and misinterpreted the situation. ( I assume the Spreadex is an individual holder?) If so and they are liquidating their holding, since the RNS came out I saw at least two over 1 million shares sold and a couple of 500,000.

Again if I have not misinterpreted the situation they may have only 2 million or so shares left to sell. It may well be once they finish selling this may tick up slightly as there have been days with small buyers nibbling up shares.

I myself intend to acquire more shares as the weeks go on. All or nothing.

I filtered the guy especially after one bad day I ended up arguing with him I believe something I avoided over the years by treating him as a semi joke account.

I may have mentioned previously the cancer jibes dont sit right with me personally. Not trying to police the message board just putting my opinion out there. Not telling anyone to change their own wording or comments either. Just putting out there that if the guy did indeed have cancer and beat it then good on him.

As far as his opinions on AYM he did in the end predict correctly the 0.50p price which I never thought would happen. Guy is still a highly irritating joke account and advise for all is just filter.

I think today is the best rise percentage wise of the year. Its a shame its on the back of a drop. However what wil be interesting to see is if somehow this can power back up above 1p.

If so it may be upon reflection the market has determined although not the best circumstances in the change of direction but a positive one none the less.

A sale of the Labrador stake if at all possible could be a catalyst in the medium term to see this settle back into the 2-3p region again (and importantly towards my breakeven).

On another message board they said the sale of labrador stake may amount to around £300k which isnt the largest some if correct.

However the symbolic act of actually selling it with the mind to focus on Parys Mountain may indeed signal to the Market that Parys Mountain is a go in the future.

If so hopefully other investors that saw the potential as have us LTH may start to believe in this project.

Saw this early on in day. I do not believe such a large volume of shares could be sold off in a short space of time.

Could this be a partial reason for the incredibly depressed prices in recent months. A large seller in the background would need to drip feed sales over time and inevitably keep the price low.

One assumes when/if the holder is liquidating their entire holding they still have a way to go. But seemingly when/if they are done a sudden bounce up may be likely.

Also that being said I saw a 1 million share purchase on the trades today and although it is not a large monetary amount in pure volume terms it would seem mopping up of shares at these historic low levels is occurring.

Do we perhaps (perversely) want to see this over 1p so that a dilutive raise occurs?

I recall in previous raises I highlighted the slight positive that in current environment oversubscription and raising of funds at least an ability to raise funds.

From my experience in industry I am in (online retail) keeping the money flowing is incredibly important. Company I work for hasn't posted a profit in years. However various Loans and financing keeps everyone paid from staff to suppliers and as long as revenue covers repayments more funding is always forthcoming. What I have seen from some incredibly larger peers in the same industry that went into liquidation it was the inability to seek more financing that was the nail in the coffin.

Obviously Aym is a complete different industry but if firstly we accept the premise that Parys Mountain will at some point be developed, then money is required to further advance towards this goal.

Personally I would rather see more dilution and see further progression. At an average of 3.3p-3.6p the sp going above 1p and falling back down below again has no impact on my state of mind day to day. Stagnation on progress at Parys Mountain, and diverting attention away from this gem however does.

I cannot remember who it was that provided a very detailed Share price figure of 32p if Parys was in production ( I would assume this would be much higher based on potential future copper prices combined with low shares in issue) but it certainly buts things in perspective long term when we are flitting to what may in hindsight be very minor price fluctuations.

I still maintain what I said in 2021, is that anything below 5p is worth it for any LTH that believes this will be in production in the future.

In a different world I would have been in at 12p. Equally in a different world I would be throwing the kitchen sink at Aym at current price.

Up moved the family to different part of the u.k in 2023 and with the change in job and higher cost of living here (and in general) combined with time off work with new baby earlier in year, disposable finances are a luxury :).

That being said did get some more shares today albeit a small quantity.

The actual figure is closer to 360 million I believe

Hey also at the very least a whole bunch of newer smaller buyers have come out the woodworks to buy, and the message board is probably the most active its been all year :).

I think the asset is and will eventually be too valuable not to mine. Supply and demand on Copper will dictate even previously unviable copper projects are suddenly worth looking at with high copper prices. Ironically we do not have an unviable project. We have a project that has alot of groundwork done and has indeed been mined previously. So much so does a bigger player offer up the finances to take a stake in the project?

IMO selling the other two stakes in Sweden and Canada will ease finances greatly and be put towards the Welsh asset. And really what the company needs most in the short term is money.

I think however what you highlight which has been the bain for most of us investors and in attracting bigger serious investors is the believability that this project will go ahead.

Perhaps cruelly for us LTH the words may have been music to our ears 2-3 years ago. "This decision has been taken as the Company believes its management efforts and financial resources are now best focused on the primary long-term goal of the development of the Parys Mountain project in Anglesey."

Time will of course tell.

The reason I ask as I read the shares in public float was 330 million.

How was your figure calculated?