Member Info for tecbadger

Ginge, nice to see another's post on here making the case for confidence intervals.

Honestly the best part of the whole thing for me is that it was run with FIND and got those results (and its a second independent evaluation at a second site).

Im not sure who AVCT ran there's with as the site wasn't mentioned in the validation RNS it merely stated "run in Europe"

Multiple independent sites with good performance is higher confidence than one site with good performance

I love the glue guns comment.

From a research company with no documented history of delivering In Vitro Diagnostics, STILL no quality system and clearly a bizarre product development process for the AffiDX

Ive got my speedos out and jumpin in too

FFB time to consider a namechange to fourfiguresbear?

Agreed Tonic. Ive heard it all before somewhere....

You are in thay 50% Kev. Never once have I seen you bring new information to this board.

RegUK and the fact it's by FIND gives it so much more credibility

i would definitely pay for an LFT everytime to get back into the stadium

All lth will ascend to a higher plane of existence. A universe based on a consciousness with a material form constructed from thought.

FIND are one of the best organisations in the field. Great endorsement

Why don't we all just wait and see how it closes today eh? ODX has a habit of struggling in the morning.

Thanks for your opinion Mr Adventurous. Maybe your company will have a ISO13485 approved QMS one day.

I just glanced at their board Regulator. Guinness world record attempt at confirmation bias ensuing.

Spreadbet closing out

turfmoor not so happy place anymore

choo choo!!

hehehe oddly satisfying Rob!

avg of 50p here now. Not seen a choo choo all aboard last station post recently. I think those need to be brought back

han****s decision making process:

Do i or my mates own any shares in this company?
If no then what companies with similar products do i own shares in?

......................................KERCHING

Deeks is blinkered by looking at the testing paradigm from purely a scientific perspective. If you speak to clinicians they are broadly supportive of a strategy that can cut out even a small proportion of viral transmission opportunities.

I'd like to ask him what his alternative is considering it's impossible to scale pcr testing to match and pcr also has an issue with false positives due to the detection of nucleic acid remnant post infection.

Somewhere between 50p and 350p I reckon. If I'm right message me to subscribe to my tips on twitter. Only 20 quid a month