Member Info for taylot

Care to explain your reason sacked?? Or is it just that an offer would validate what flybe have and that wouldn’t suit your agenda...

You will get what they offer - if it is accepted. It will likely be decided by the II's anyway. The internet is a wealth of information ;-)

Now go find a link that shows what load factor is required on the Q400 and E175 before they are making a profit - it’s a lot less than the A320 and 737. Anyway.. from what I’ve been seeing load factor is picking up. ATB. And congrats to all long suffering BB posters that are still putting up with you know who!!!

continued... "This was put down to a number of factors, including new costs associated with commercial agreements, establishing new revenue streams, facilitating exceptional passenger and cargo growth and a �6.6m impairment of fixed assets."

Sacked do you understand what one-off costs are???

You don't actually have a clue what your talking about and its been shown time and again. Yesterday claiming cash burn is high when they are making a profit. AND as i pointed out yesterday -which you declined to counter- that reduced profit was down to one off costs. With the fleet reductions there is still lots to play for and profitability will increase.

Maz - theres no twin about it!!! A.smithy - 2 posts, both on Flybe.... hmmmm... sacked is at it again. At least he can tell himself he has some friends...

Good -and expected- response. Open a short if you see 20's?? Do you need me to explain what a short is? It is what you see in the mirror, but don't get the two mixed up.

I expect them to be removed - the sign of a lost argument. I don't see it as negative as that, i really don't. Actual results were be critical particularly forward looking statements, but they haven't said the loads are down or XYZ, just that maintenance costs were higher than expected. Like i said i am guessing its to do with hand-backs, why they didn't go into more detail is beyond me as that would have provided reassurance. Im also not as negative ref the BoD, they are all new ish on the scene and come with prior pedigree so may have more sway than you give them credit for. Yes he has (yet again) shown himself up for completely misunderstanding basic numbers. Sacked, perhaps your time would be better suited to reading articles on basic financials and equity trading rather than typing "flybe bad news" into google.

You can sense the glee in you post.. i'm glad you lost your money!!!! The various news stories.. that are just reiterating what was in the RNS? See my posts below, no comment?? Funny as that was all based on FACT which you struggle to deal with. Just consistently posting news articles (when they are negative) "Cash burn is now a serious concern" funny as they are still making a profit in spite of one-off IT and stated maintenance costs and with fleet size reduced things are getting better IMO. I will agree with you BoD earnings are OTT but comments regarding leadership and excuses I will disagree. If you are so sure the SP is heading to the 20s open a short.. no??

I don't know anything further into the incidents so cannot comment - and wouldn't if i did. The age of the aircraft and engine efficiency is totally unrelated. The engines are regularly checked, replaced and overhauled. Embraer engines are efficient and the Q400 engine is fantastic, i cant recall figures but its very very impressive. The thing is the costs of general maintenance are fairly set. They either have their own engineers at X base (set wages and costs) or out source the whole of X base operations (set price) parts etc. ok can be expensive but generally i would think are on warranty/set cost agreements. I have my suspicions - as these are "unexpected costs" "particularly Q400" that they are in someway related to the hand-back checks (this requires the aircraft to be in the exact same condition they were on delivery).

Nothing like monarch what so ever. You think Flybe have legacy issues, compared to monarch the E195s are a godsend!!!!

My thoughts exactly. Market spooked by the profit warning and understandably so. However, why is there a reduced projected profit? Because of one off costs which will improve the ongoing performance (i believe/imagine there have also been extra costs in regards to major aircraft damage at AMS and a tail strike - i forget where). So this to me is actually further good news, with the Q400 hand-backs are nearly complete and E195s going to Stobart for next season, Flybe look to be positioning themselves actually quite well IMO. As i have said before the fleet decision that will need to be taken in the near-term will be vital and i really hope they stick to/go with the Q400/E175 combo. But at this price it is looking attractive.

Boo Hoo. Everyone has lost at some time or another it’s how you learn - I lost circa 60% getting in at 160p but took my medicine. Do I blame Flybe? No I blame the management at the time for shocking decisions. If you spent your energy positively researching elsewhere you would be in a much better place financially and mentally!!!!!!!

Thanks mate, trying to work out if it's worth a trade. Would have to sell a few KIBO tho...

Anyone find it difficult to get orders filled today??

Evening all. Anyone any idea on how long this suspension will last and whether the opening bid is likely to be at a premium?? Will the reopening coincide with the project announcement??

Try www.rnsalert.com free to register, email alerts are free and always come thru straight away.

30,000 from me. Fortunately sold a few just before the **** hit.