RE: Audit Issues Are Massive7 May 2021 15:13
The valuation is a reflection of years of missing their forward statements and failure to realise the potential many believe the tenements hold. Now the bold step has been made to raise funds via a 'cheap' equity funding to firm up resources and exploit the potential via exploration - at a cost of $5m. Whilst maintaining production and extending lifetime of mine (which for all deep narrow vein mining operations is traditionally short).
A recent accident at the mining site, accounting issues, assay aggregation errors and drop in production levels have help to perpetuate a feeling that this company lurches from one mistake to another. However, this year has the potential to change the perception and maybe the last chance for the current management.
The initial expo results have done nothing to dispel many peoples believe that the tenements hold vast resources - with company expectations of firming up 3m. With that the extra development work should lead to enough RoM to reintroduce the recently purchased ore sorter and thus push production levels passed guidance levels of 33,000-36,000. Additionally, it looks like Coringa will now actually get started in July which has been some time coming, although the final license is still outstanding (and a risk).
The problem with the audit is that many are stating it is only 80,000 what is the issue. Well it is twofold firstly it shows that the checks and balances are not in place or working and secondly, we can't be sure that the 80,00 is the end of the matter. Accountants will be trawling through historic accounts as well. All of which does reputation damage. It was only because we are listed on the canadian exchange which requires accounts 3 months after year end that this was in the public domain. AIM requires accounts 6 months after year end so now as each day passes the risk of no accounts being produced weighs on the share price. The sooner the better.
Anyway with gold going higher today and the resisitance at 1800 broken this looks to have the ability to shoot up if the mgmt can regain credibility with the next set of data, then the next etc.