Member Info for TalkingSense

End of day sell off....then gap up again in the morning.

Can easily do another +1p tomorrow as way undervalued at these levels still

Yes as per twitter post on 22nd Jan

https://twitter.com/DDS_DocHoliday/status/1749396777873158462?t=u3VW3WFoPWQRFC0GX58vfA&s=19

Fair enough....sentiment is key on AIM

Surprised to see 60% rise when in the RNS it states:

""The initial results from the Itumbula West-1 well are very positive. We have encountered elevated helium shows, as the team had anticipated pre-drill, all the way to Basement. "

So results were as anticipated...not exceeding expectations

Adam did say that a positive result would likely lead to follow up drilling , maybe with a diamond rig

Mental, Good point.

And because of the shallow depth we should not expect bonanza grades in this campaign.

The drills are 'pathfinders' so gold detection in the vast majority of the holes would be a positive result at this stage IMHO.

Always good to reference 'Smart people' while typing a post that proves you are not one of them....lol

Thanks Oiland,

I do look forward to your regular quarterly ECR bashing post (9 posts and all repetitive and negative on ECR and always harping back to the CB days.)

You may have noticed there have been a few changes at ECR lately.

Drilling results from Creswick phase 1 due any time.

REE sampling results from Lolworth also due.

And the MD has just returned from Oz where he has had meetings with other players in the industry.

The next couple of weeks/ months newsflow will show what progress ECR are making.

So the '400g rock chip' was actually a rock chip that when sampled was 400 g/t .....at least that clears that up

Base-jumper,

i don't think your pence in the pound statement on the heavy machinery disposal is very accurate ...the rig was only (from memory) sold at a 15% loss to the price paid new.

The rest is your opinion which you are entitled to....but it seems you have a severe chip on the shoulder where Doc is concerned.

400g = that would be £20,500 of gold...did he mis-speak?

BTB - I would have thought a £2.3m trade would have moved the SP a lot !!!!.....lol

We know what you mean....welcome on board

I think there is potential here so jumped on board this morning

Gordonbennet...

I see that COLP that you were pumping on Friday is 40% down from that high

And MAST that you were pumping yesterday is 40% down from the point you were ramping it on other BBs.

Both leaving a lot of investors who took your 'tips' on massive losses.

And now you are getting to work on EQT ......Buyer beware! There are some parasites on AIM that feed on the losses of the unwary

Https://twitter.com/DDS_DocHoliday/status/1747169261930283165?t=8A714cY-NKj1-b4OTt49aw&s=19

Nicepair, Let's both just agree that we are telling the truth.

Yours is just on a longer timescale ;-)

Since Mike & Nick have taken over they have stabilised the finances, continued the sampling at Lolworth, sold the assets so we have funding for all of 2024 in the bank, ditched Hurricane, got the KondaP asset and started the drilling programme at Creswick...............Is there anything else operationally you believe they should have done additionally / done differently (and I know you won't just say 'find some gold' as that would be a really dick answer)?

OK Nicepair, So if I state the positive reported results and recent news then I am 'ramping'...even though it's current and relative to the performance of the company

In that case if you are lamenting the decisions of previous management (and your own previous investment choice) or harping back to old/historic results or the share performance over 3 years (and not mentioning we are 20% up over the last 3 months) repeatedly in a negative fashion to suite your agenda are you then 'deramping' .

Just wanted to check how to describe your posting accurately.

(I agree with the TI comment by the way ;-)

Nicepair. No, ramping is setting unrealistic expectations....I state facts and opinions based on those facts.

We've had about 9 sets of good results in RNSs from Lolworth on various resources including gold, lithium niobium and other REEs.....that is a fact.

The expected resource footprint for gold is expanding further that first thought as additional results and understanding of the resource structure develops ( as per RNS).

The footprint of Lolworth is over 900 square km.

There are areas of similar geological make up (to the areas producing the current good sampling results) that have not yet been tested, leading to expectations of further areas of interest (as per RNS).

REE sampling results are due soon.

Lolworth was described by the company as a potential world class resource (as per RNS)

All the above are facts...not baseless ramping , unless you would like to correct them.

When have I 'ramped' Lolworth?

So why dud you ask the question to which you had no interest in the answer and not just post your thoughts (made yourself look a little silly as well)?

I agree with you on the apparent scattergun historic drilling across other areas....wasn't a good plan.

Also good to see you totally agree with the new BOD strategy of concentrating on Crewick with drilling.

Let's see what ghr phase 1 results bring.