Member Info for TalkingSense

Cocopops,

Oooh, Tetchy.

You do realise that an alluvial crew and kit may not be appropriate for hard rock mining.

Also Raglan is ready for production now, Maddens is 2-3 months away and BM end of year (so if all the equipment moves to BM now they cannot use it for anything)

And the BOD have already stated that they will utilise/share/move equipment between licenses where appropriate.

And I would hope that when BM comes on line they will recruit additional crew so they can work all 3 producing sites to maximum capacity concurrently.

Also love the Trumpian , capital letter , if I make a poor argument I can names call and shout with caps style.

(I can do it to)

YOU NON HOLDING SAD TROLL WITH NO LIFE !

(Mine was done will less anger though...love you!)

Cocopops,

What are you on about?

Because we buy a highly prospective new asset you think we should stop work at Raglan, which is a revenue generating license for the next few years.....that makes absolutely no sense.

A bit like Bailey slamming the BOD for the company position compared to when they took over.

We now have multiple prospective licenses, Imminent revenue from Maddens and Raglan to make us self-funding, Medium term production from Salt Bush and BM and an excellent long term state level asset in Lolworth....And then stating the company is in a worse position than 3 years ago when it was on the point of collapse and taking one at a time pot shots with drilling campaigns.....And expecting ECR to do this using zero funds (I guess he thought that new licenses were going to be gifted to us and crews would drill for free?).

For those that missed the presentation and interview that keep getting referred to:

ECR Paleogold presentation: https://wp-ecr-2026.s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/media/2026/04/ECR_Paleogold_Deal.pdf

Nick interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fsTUSjhm_Ag

Bailey, If you want to make an assumption based on a situation 3 or 4 BODs ago that's your privilege.

Personally I'll take the CURRENT chairman's word over ancient ECR history .

JV progressing and with the lawyers - stated in this week's interview

Obviously if the b.c.m figures are upgraded then at the following grades:

0.18 b.c.m - $178.5k profit a month

0.24 b.c.m - $252k profit a month

0.36 b.c.m - $399k profit a month

As a benchmark BM is expected to be at 0.35 b.c.m

Gwynwin......You need a new calculator ... £2bn ......LoL

More like:

A 60tph washplant will process around 33 bcm per hour.

Assuming a 10 hour day and 0.12 g/bcm (ECR's VERY conservative figure) tha'ts about 1.5 ounces per day.

At today's price just over $7k a day.

$2K a day expenses leaves $5k profit.

21 days a month gives c$108k profit a month....and that's the low, conservative estimate

Baileysea,

Have you any evidence that nothing is happening on the Creswick JV - They never set a timeline!

Nick said that it is progressing and is with the lawyers ....unless you have any evidence to contradict him I would assume that is correct

"Broker notes and RNS is all that matters"

Nice to know you are agreeing with the latest broker note target of 0.68p.

Work already underway at Maddens

https://x.com/i/status/2047132262941257882

They have already rebranded the previously acquired companies into the ECR family and built the brand awareness within the Australian gold community so don't think they would rebrand again . Likely Paleogold will become part of the 'ECR' branded stable at some point.

The gold production figures will do the talking moving forward (the likes of GGP did not have to rebrand).

They have rebranded everything to the 'ECR' named family in Australia to improve the company profile already.

If anything I would expect Paleogold to fall under the 'ECR' naming umbrella moving forward at some point.

....in the meantime I think they'll prioritise effort into gold production over marketing.

Https://ecrminerals.com/investors/

In the 'Results centre' on the right hand side

Here's the link to the Paleogold presentation on the ECR website with clear timeliness and revenue (in case you missed it yesterday):

https://wp-ecr-2026.s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/media/2026/04/ECR_Paleogold_Deal.pdf

"The market has spoken" ....LOL

26 of the 47 trades today are under £50 and only c£26k traded.

I would say that the market is waiting to see how this plays out/happy to keep their current investment in ECR..... with a very low number of trades moving the SP yesterday/today.

Traders watch the SP .....Investors watch the Operation

MULTIPLE PATHWAYS TO VALUE:

PRODUCTION

MADDENS FLAT

Far North Queensland

• 6,260t @ 22.1 g/t Au (JORC)

• Processing plant in place

• Targeting first gold ~Month 3

• Multiple mines on one EPM

• Historic average 25 g/t Au

IMMEDIATE CASHFLOW

NEXT PRODUCTION

SALT BUSH FLAT

South Australia

• 310m+ strike length, 7+ g/t Au

• Vat leach technology

• Est. 10,000+ oz resource

• 20% investment with ongoing JV

• First gold targeted ~ Month 14

PRODUCTION PIPELINE

EXPLORATION

TUCKANARRA

Western Australia

• Adj. to Odyssey 407,000 oz resource

• Paleochannels confirmed by radar

• Gold nuggets on southern boundary

• New licence extension granted

• 9,958 acres

EXPLORATION UPSIDE

On Thursdsy Coco posted:

"ECR need to issue the market with a key timeline and presentation that they are held to via an RNS and that would shut people like me up as long as they hit the deadlines and will also bring in some anticipation of news, at the moment, retail dont care as there isnt really anything to go on"

Here's the link to the Paleogold presentation on the ECR website with clear timeliness and revenue:

https://wp-ecr-2026.s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/media/2026/04/ECR_Paleogold_Deal.pdf

Does Coco have inside information as he seems to be foretelling all the actions the BOD are making to add value?

Coco posted on Thursday:

"Talking- its not my figures- its the brokers who are inside on the company

SO do i take your made up numbers or the brokers notes?"

So Coco agrees that figures in the brokers notes should be believed as they have good insight to the company:

Yesterday's Oak securities broker note set a target of 0.68p which backs up Coco's assertion that this will double.

Prior to the RNS Coco posted:

"If ECR were to put a strong board in place , Locally with mining experience, they would 2x the price short term"

Now with Chris Gibbs operationally managing Australian projects and Mike Parker (both with extensivd minkng experience of bringing prospects into production)working with the Palrogold Australian mining team we have a great local team....meeting the criteria he set.

And with share allocation being triggered by $10m of production confidence must be high that we can hit/exceed those numbers which will enable the CLN to be paid off , significantly reducing dilution.

That would mean just c650m shares for significant multi-million yearly revenue assets.

Coco,

You must be happy with today's RNS

On 15th April you posted:

"If ECR were to put a strong board in place , Locally with mining experience, they would 2x the price short term"

....and in this deal we merge the expertise of the local Paleogold team with Chris Gibbs and the rest of the ECR team.

SP will double short term -Coco has foretold it !

Coco,

You must be happy with today's RNS

On 15th April you posted:

"If ECR were to put a strong board in place , Locally with mining experience, they would 2x the price short term"....and in this deal we merge the expertise of the