Member Info for Suzy2

Linda Ylivainio...spelt it wrong sorry Linda.

Linda Ylviano is Centre Party same Annie Loof...there's a temporary leader at the moment, which is a member of the January Parties Co-Alition. And the PM said in 2014 just before he was elected that this would be decided according to the law not politics; so much for that assurance.

I'm voting Jo and her exit of brexit.

Eric. There are arrows and arrows.....take tro turtle dovesfor instance. On another matter....the political situation and I mean in Sweden is getting interesting, some talk of the left holding hands with the right; a phenomenon that has always interested me. In the UK it is not at all interesting...just desperate.

Evie eve X

Just had my first Christmas Card, a partridge in a pear tree...very appropriate I thought. Time for a poem:

And not by eastern windows only,
When daylight comes, comes in the light,
In front the sun climbs slow, how slowly,
But westward, look, the land is bright.

Japanese Knotweed is getting a setback from rust. Lol

The brightest spot for me in the recent statement was the Parkijaure No 6 licence...can they come back and say, you can't do mining because there might occasionally be reindeer walking about. No!

Think of it as an acorn.

Oaktree...I think your despair too soon...it was a gamble ten years ago and now it's a valuable asset...and I'm convinced it will be mined.

Finland and Kossovo are looking good. ;-) No, I'm not feeling negative, only realistic and I'm holding tightly onto my shares..

Re timelines.....they don't mean a thing. How many times have we been told the decision would be made 'before Easter'...'after summer', etc, etc since 2015? And the governmnent are completely shameless about it. Linda Ylivano is doing battle for us but it isn't encouraging that she has to...it means the government are dissembling.

Wednesday today....will it be on the agenda? Probably not We're being taken for a ride

Linda Ylivano is a member of the Centre Party same as Annie Loof, which is in the co-alition with the Social Democrats.

Thanks to Ms Ylivano...it's good to have friends

The County Administrative Board had therefore been able to feel some relief over a proposal, which meant that it would have to release these cases which they clearly and well-documented consider to be difficult and difficult to investigate. But not.

The fact that the county administrative board was entrusted with specialized competences as a water authority for the Bottenviken water district and having an environmental assessment delegation for Norrbotten county does not seem to be at the discretion of the county management - that it may also be reasonable for other county administrative boards to take responsibility for other specialized competences.

If the county management's understanding of what a dialogue is, means that a governor and a county council for a politically elected politician - besides accusations of lack of knowledge and objectivity - try to discredit his driving forces to debate the government's mining policy and the need for reform of the Mineral Act.

If a county governor and a county council additionally think it is appropriate to tell this politician what she is going to do, I think the county administrative board has a bit left to convince me and other northern rebels that you have our confidence, as you say safeguard in vision and goals.

I have formed opinion on my official Facebook page, I have actively participated in the mining committee's mining and mineral debate in the spring, in breakfast seminars in the parliament organized by colleagues and there square my cane horse - the government must decide processing concessions. Still, this seems to have bypassed the county line in Norrbotten. Is this moon representative of the county management's external monitoring?

The county management goes to a storm against a reasoning I never had. They do not even bother to try to make sure or ensure that the information in the article, which they have become so angry at, is correct. In the interview with me, I did not respond in the way that was unfortunately incorrectly described in the article. I have never stated that what I call Lex Kallak, namely the County Administrative Board's self-objective in this matter, would be about the County Board's approach to the world heritage issue.

But it was not with the Kalla case that the County Administrative Board's ability to decide matters in the manner prescribed by the laws could begin to be questioned. For example, in LKAB's application for the processing license Malmberget K no. 5, the problems with the county administrative board's lack of ability and decision-making difficulty can be discerned. In this case, the County Administrative Board's own diary can follow the correspondence between the authorities, where the then state's lawyer repeatedly requests and reminds the county administrative board to issue an opinion in the manner prescribed by the Mineral Act.

The County Administrative Board requests supplements from the company in the opinions of January 2011 and July 2012. Supplements which, in principle, as soon as they arrive at the Berg State are immediately communicated with the county administrative board. Months and years go by. Since the county administrative board's first request for supplementation in January 2011, the county administrative board can make an assessment just before 2012 will move into 2013.

In the Kalla case, the County Administrative Board - without an assessment in accordance with the rule in Chapter 3, §§ 10 of the Environmental Code - already lands in the following conclusion on October 1, 2014: "The County Administrative Board therefore does not consider that processing concession ... should be allowed" (dnr 543-5306-14). Three years (!) Later, on November 30, 2017, the county administrative board for the first time expressed in Chapter 3 § 10 MB assessment and this time to the government, following a uniquely sharp request from the government. This time, according to the government's explicit request, the county administrative board also gives its view of the business's impact on Laponia's world heritage values ??and states that Laponia has no decisive significance for the conclusion of… assessment according to Chapter 3 MB ”(dnr 543-14195-2017).

For posting Linda Ylivano's article in NSD;

Here comes Ylivainio's post. All the honor to Ylivainio and NSD leaders who fight for Norrbotten.

It is now seen that other mining companies highlight Kallak in their arguments. One reason for that, I think, is that the Kallak application is without loads and unless Kallak is approved, it will be difficult for other applications to get approved as most other applications have loads with regard to environmental impact.

An important part of this post is this:

"In the Kalla case, the County Administrative Board - without an assessment in accordance with the rule in Chapter 3, §§ 10 of the Environmental Code - already lands in the following conclusion on October 1, 2014:" The County Administrative Board does not therefore consider that a processing license ... should be allowed "(dnr 543-5306-14). Three years (!) Later, on November 30, 2017, the county administrative board for the first time expressed in Chapter 3 § 10 MB assessment and this time to the government, following a uniquely sharp request from the government. This time, according to the government's express request, the county administrative board also gives its view of the business's impact on the world heritage of Laponia's values ??and states that Laponia has no decisive significance for the conclusion of… assessment according to Chapter 3 MB ”(dnr 543-14195-2017)."

- -------------------------------------------------- -----------------

In its response to my debate article, the county management does not try to discredit the intentions behind my opinion formation on the issue. So let's start there. What is and what has my case been?

For over three years, the question of the state of the mining industry has been one of my heart issues. That no other politician seemed willing to take a bullet for the mining and minerals industry that is important to northern Sweden was one reason - among other things - that I was running for parliament. I wanted to go to the Swedish Parliament to form opinion and reform the legislation in this area.

Well here I have not let the question out of sight. I have so far in vain pressed Minister of Business Ibrahim Baylan and Prime Minister Stefan Löfven on when the government intends to decide the five lying applications for processing concessions that have been on the government's table for years.

Prioritised and forthcoming....difficult to climb down from there.

PS Of course, they could say no, not bloody likely.

Maria Suner Fleming wasn't happy she looked like a woman on the warpath to me and I'm sure there will be waves from that Conference.

Thanks Aug.

He didn't need to press him and it would have been futile if he had....Kurt is a professional. The question was the subject of he conference and it's idiotic to pretend otherwise. Prioritised and forthcoming is where we're at.