Member Info for SunDrum

RandomPunter - Theorist refuses to answer the question and it is therefore fair to assume that he has known PA for c.30 years as per his statement yesterday. Now we know that it sheds light on the type of character he is.

Let me ask you these questions to put it into context. Is there someone that wronged you 30 years ago whose career you have consequently followed religiously? Someone you have held a grudge against for decades (possibly in secret), so much so you systematically and relentlessly attack their character online for almost 2 years? Someone whose business you have deliberately talked down and attacked on c.380 separate occasions online? And doing all that anonymously online, rather than confronting the individual you have a grievance with in person, in the real world.

No? That would be pretty weird wouldn't it?

The point is, it is hard to argue his behaviour is not that of a complete sociopath.

Theo - If you said that finance would not be committed to next quarter I would believe the polar opposite. Stop avoiding the question - precisely how many years have you known Paul Atherley?

BarclaysShare - Theorist is a sociopathic liar. He said PRE wouldn't receive ATF funding - it did. He said Artisan didn't invest - they did. He refuted M&G's investment. He claimed he had no connection to Paul Atherley - he confirmed yesterday he has known him for 30 years.
If you want the truth about PRE I'd strongly recommend not listening to a sociopath with a personal vendetta against Paul Atherley.

Theo - answer my question. Have you known Paul Atherley 30 years or not? A simple yes or no will suffice.

Theo - You are a proven liar - explain to anyone on here why they should listen to a word you write. Your lack of humility is astonishing.

Oh dear Theo. You've properly dropped a catch. As if your credibility could plunge any further you have surpassed yourself this time. Despite denying on numerous occasions you don't know Paul Atherley you have now explicitly confirmed you have known him for 30 years.
Perhaps you misspoke? Would you care to clarify - have you known him for 30 years or do you not know him? Which is it?

Correct Island1.

Theo - you are like some sort of unwelcome ghoul. Go away you boring little man.

Gents - this is not a good look. Let's agree to disagree and move on. Two more opportunities for an RNS before the end of the quarter. Let's just see what happens.

Like the rest of us, he knows what he holds and is very confident of the outcome we have predicted for a long time. Responding to all the nonsense on here gets boring after a while.

Someone should have told M&G. Your talents are wasted on here Smartpunter.

Backing the wrong horse really sticks in your craw doesn't it? The bad news for you is it is only going to get worse.

Don't remember reading about Rambler in any of HMG's comms, unlike Pensana that is front and centre of the UK's Critical Minerals strategy. Perhaps you can point us in the right direction SmartPunter.

Just can't help yourself can you? Like a moth to the flame.

Odd. I've just double checked and they aren't according to my search. LI does have the odd bug though.

RareEarther - did you know he and PA aren't connected on LI? Given Hamilton's focus/target market, would that not strike you as odd?

RandomPunter - You overestimate how many people read the tripe you write.

"Another year of failure" - some random on the internet that makes money downramping stocks.

£4 million additional investment - M&G

Hmmmm.

To summarise, you have M&G, Artisan Partners, FSDEA and HMG who think PRE have a viable project. All of which have invested multiple millions of GBP.

Then you have the following that don't believe they have a viable project; 3 anonymous randoms on the internet, someone paid by the Chinese state and someone that had to publicly apologise for getting his facts wrong. All of whom are financially motivated to downramp Pensana.

Which group would any sane person believe?

Hogsnipe - you forgot the bit about Kruemmer being employed by the Chinese.
I suppose he has credibility in China. Not so much outside China.

Smartpunter - I refer you to my earlier statement. 'Actual credibility' being the operative phrase.