Member Info for Summit

Think quite a few would take 70p because it's better the devil you know and because of ongoing risks

Mre update would be required rather than those cheeky people at nc getting our asset on the cheap chirp chirp

Think we can all sleep safely now 1st time :)

Eh...where does that dog collar come from ...didnt tell you what he is a reverend of ? COULD BE the Devil himself lmao

Mac is very relaxed :)

Process

Yes mac but look what happens when you dont give urgency to the sale pricess...we get stuck in this geopolitical mire...its all very well not wanting to rush but it increases execution risks

The problem with establishing a fair market value is that the extent of havieron is still unknown...however a cut off point should be agreed and it's not the initial maiden resource....an uplift clause may be one way of dealing with it...however there is greater risk on getting paid

If royal so good then perhaps dont need tax payers money...:)

He is suggesting pis are more likely to capitulate than iis

Is that another friend of a friend expert ... ? :)

Gecko. The bod have mentioned some of the ideas such as contrary to reports they have not been selling shares ...if the sp drops significantly for no genuine reason they are right to defend it

Gecko
The company has a duty to protect the assets and dispel false ideas so no I dont agree with you.

Depends on the size of the budgie. Tweetie pie rules

Yeah but they could have easy added in riders and given the sensitivity of matters not impressed by the rechurn

And if I was sd would be cheesed off to say the least.

To me the mere release by newcrest was designed to create a lower cost expectation on what they are prepared to pay....this posturing will not go down well imo

Dont need zero zoros to put a moistened rag on the sp let it rise enjoy it live it :)

Sand think it is expected .....

Would not be on proactive unless something to report :)