Member Info for StuWoo

Mark, if you really, honestly, genuinely, actually owned shares, it would not be an indicator of how "corrupt" YOU ARE (or not).

BUT, as MH01 suggests, not selling them now if you believe what you say when you post things like:

"This share is going to be like Condor Gold when then done a share split, it will keep on falling back to the pennies."

And: "...other brokers said its over priced and if it was as big as people say, the people are either owners or people trying to push up the price. in real money it will be bk to 12p * 20= 240 at best. very soon. "

...would indicate an extreme case of 'Moron in a hurry' syndrome. Sell if you think you're going to lose money; just posting doom and gloom won't help your bank balance.

BTW pls quote your sources for the 'other brokers" who "...said it was overpriced" please?

And the price is (being kept) artificially low: for any other company generating the FCF we are it would/should be higher. (If 'that' company didn't have our CapEx commitments/was not where we are in terms of our growth and development cycle either, as a SH you'd not be shocked to see a dividend!)

Net nett: couldn't agree with you more: someone/thing building a position and then we'll uptick...

@123gold instead of spouting your opinion, back it up with some facts, evidence or data?

What do you think of the Free Cash Flow GGP are now generating? The extended mine life and efficiencies at Telfer?

What, with your all seeing eye, do you think will be the MRE for Havieron. Why do you think, when this share cross lists and rids itself from moronsinahurry like you, and gains Oz investors who HAVE to invest, it won't uplift. And lastly, oh super seer, what is your reason for this share not 'recovering' until a year after that cross listing?

Effin' about - for 60 seconds

In principle MMs over here 'could' affect SP but two this will have played out:

1. the action over here with big boys will have gone, done

2. chance are IIs in Oz will buy in big (they're not stupid and they are straight) and we will be a largeish mid-cap so easily in their top 250 possibly 100 shares. This could and should make it easier for us to move over here from AIM to FTSE 250 WHICH IS REGULATED!

@letgetrich: "I was referring to Haverion"

"I know, wasn't taking a pop at you just adding to what you said..."

SORRY CLICKED SEND TO QUICK!

in simple terms, Havieron has more gold and copper there than previously announced. Each meter they go down, once they hit the orebody, significantly reduces AISC and grows profit.

That alone should have sent the SP rocketing.

But AIM is scum/scam/skim - take your pick: if you're a LTH, an investor, rejoice at the suppression of the SP today - it means big boys want shares cheap. Equally when they MMs don't suppress the SP, it's cos they want action/shares the other harder way - they want to entice retail holders to sell.

As SD has said many times, he is grateful to London, and the UK's retail investors (not sure he is a fan of AIM but it was the only mechanism) but, when we cross list with ASX, who know mining, gold mining in particular and support Aussie companies, actions lik today will be thigs of the past. MMs can't control or hold back news that delivers against or beyond KPIs.

This has always been a long play. It's now almost de-risked (nothing ever is 100%). In fact, one of the newer risks is hostile bid that would mean, as SD has always said, "an eye watering sum"

Chill out. Hold on. Trust the experts who say our BOD is second to none - they all want life changing results too, otherwise they would not have jumped from very well paid j0bs

I don't often write on here for all sorts of reasons called people.

Whilst a lot of what you say is true, you are wrong about one thing. Gold is coming out of the ground - at Telfer; far more than NCM wanted to look for and NEM knew about it. It will pay for Havieron's (where it is true that it is not atm) development, without us borrowing, and bringing on stream at an optimised rate. So 'Bridging the gap' and extending beyond that.

Most people on here won't understand the implications of today's RNS -

yup. couldn't agree more.

classic mm tree shake (**** drop) they give it a go, people come on here and micturate their beds soooohhh, rinse and repeat.

advertise you've lost money and advertise for them to drop it...

it's a lt investment ffs.

Agree with your sentiment but think Sandeep knew and the NCM BOD knew he knew. And that's why they got rid. So their SHs didn't keep hear him banging on about Havieron. So they'd approve the NEM bid and Sherry etc would get rich?

@Timber Trader, not an unreasonable assumption with our ridiculously qualified (and well remunerated) BOD/team, the latest recruit to which being an expert in....merger debt finance amongst others?

Opens up potential for either a bigger Fortescue Pilbara play or a strong position to JV with Northern Star?

@mh01 okay should have said not 'trading' as a share,

Either way, NCM or whatever they are are not developing Hav with us. Any more. That'd be NEM.

The pedantry aside, the point is still well made - the GGP site cannot be relied upon to be up to date - and BTW nor would I want it to be FYI atm

Not sure we can take any reference to what's on the GGP site too religiously; AFA it's concerned, we're developing Havieron with a company that is no longer trading!

From 'About us':

'Greatland holds a portfolio of precious and base metals focused exploration and development projects in Western Australia.

Greatland’s principal asset is its 30% interest in Havieron, a high-grade gold-copper deposit located on Mining Lease M45/1287 in the Paterson Province in Western Australia which is being advanced under an unincorporated joint venture between Greatland and Newcrest Mining Limited.@

Plode writes like every other troll on here.

Quick in and out sentences.

Containing no facts. Just opinions which we all know are like something else everyone has.

Except, with a handle like '...plode' one guesses his must be much bigger, so he can talk out of it too?

Err, that's the point innit Fred?

With all the buys going on (so artificial to the max) would suggest shorts being closed.

Wonder what they know?

Culpeper. having seen the quote I provided (no doubt at least for the second time) answer this straight question: do you think Bamps quotes figures in USD or AUSD or do you, as you asserted, think he doesn't know?

One of those answers would, if you had any class, require an apology

You opened with a comment on "...his posts..."plural. Not the one you are claiming to refer to.

Inference being you keep up with them.

You were having a dig. Stop weasleing out. I doubt you have the temerity, mannners or even cajones to apologise. So at least STFU.

In the meantime, here's a copy of a Bamps quote from a few days ago. Note he reference NEM's savings wishes. Were they referring to Aus dollars. Mmmm think not

"What could Telfer valuation be:-

"What co

Newmont want $3.05bn of synergies and sells

$500m from Lihir and Cadia

$500 other synergies and bulk caving skill sets , probably Newcrest patent on caving

$2bn of sells

https://www.ggpchat.co.uk/viewtopic.php?t=722

Post on 21st May 2023 shows the NPV “bubbles” of each of the combined assets.

There are 6 mines and 2 projects

Telfer has 12% of the total NPV , Havieron is not mentioned so presuming that figure is combined.

This works out at $240m

That was nearly 12 months ago Telfer value is falling.

I can’t see the value being much more as the rest of the mines value would decrease if Telfers increases distorting their NPV values.

NCM also might not be able to achieve or might get more.

$240m looks like a great value for both , I would have thought that to be a minimum.

Who knows what’s going to happen 🤷‍♂️"

No, you were having a dig.