Member Info for stu485

JFH,

Your answer…Nothing !

Hemo’ are subject to the same risks and costs as others in the AML treatment arena. The mCap reflects the above and financial resources at hand .It is not disproportionate when properly considered.

AIMO

JFH,

Please stop banging on that the SP slide is due to anything other than what it really is !

And that is ,

…the risk and cost of clinical trials particularly for AML treatments.

The market recognises the above and just how difficult it could be to raise the necessary funding.

It’s very simple really.

AIMO

Stinky Pete,

I know you and the gang know where I am.

Maybe those who provided that information can send me another coded message to shut t f up or else.

I did keep a color copy before it was deleted, might come in handy one day !

They may have noticed , threatening me will not work.

GLA

AIMO

Mr I,

Just to preempt your conspiracy theory running wilder than normal,I’ll be going away again in about a week.

That’s regardless of the SP movement, it’s called living life, you should try it one day.

I suspect those in the dilution camp are expecting a much lower discount to SP than you state, time will tell.

AIMO

Mri,

“I would have thought anyone who believed this was a slam dunk from prevail or another pharma would be gobbling up these shares. “

Why are you confused when you’ve clearly answered your own question in the statement made earlier and copied above?

By definition, many do not believe it’s a slam dunk and are concerned about a large funding dilution.

Ps.

Your MO is so transparent . Complain a little about the company for credibility and then suggest only a fool wouldn’t buy right now.

You’ve been applying the same old for years, i’d suggest a change if you really want to influence 😉

AIMO

JFH…JFH…dear boy,

Please, READ the question!

We all know how shorts win or lose, thank you.

The question (still unanswered!!) ,

… WHY is there such a large short interest open?

Why do the shorter’s believe the SP will fall when you, all but guarantee Funding will not be diluting?

Do you see my point yet? The big boys think you’re wrong.

AIMO

JFH,

Please try and be a little less verbose, life’s to short to read your posts !

Anyway, …was that an answer ? I don’t think so!

So again, to you & Stinky Pete,

Q, Why is there such a large short interest if as you and others propose , there’s a non dilutive funding deal/partnership around the corner of the O.K.Corral ?

Try again and please fewer words 🙏

AIMO

Blast,

You shouldn’t believe all you read!

Stinky Pete,

Cat got your tongue?

I’m waiting!

HT , (Stinky Pete).

I like the analogy!

One question and one I’ve already asked JFH who refused an answer.

Q, Why is there such a large short interest if as you and others propose , there’s a non dilutive funding deal/partnership around the corner of the O.K.Corral ?

Looking forward to a plausible answer.

AIMO

HT,

Nope , the question is ;

…….Who’s paying for the fuel !?

AIMO

JFH,

Last dig I promise, on anchor watch and need a drink!

Can’t stop myself from highlighting the exact words you used when last wrong regarding dilutive funding.

“It’s incredibly unlikely “ …and then it happened!

Good night.

AIMO

JFH,

Nope Vlad didn’t state what you claim and neither would he . The company knows better and would not blatantly mislead as you are & have.

Let’s put this straight right now.

Hemo’ have NOT stated within any RNS that they have a cure for all known viruses and/or cancer.

Yes they hope some of their products have such potential.

To state they already have cures as you have, is misleading and discredits you and your intelligence.

AIMO

JFH,

Why did you feel the need to state publicly that Hemo have a cure for all viruses and cancer, when actually they don’t!?

Why deliberately mislead ?

I’ve made my thoughts on funding clear and unless you can point it out for me , I believe I’ve told no untruths such as yours.

Let’s leave it there.

Happy to eat humble pie should funding through P1 be none dilutive.

We’ll see.

AIMO

JFH,

Nope, I’ll stick with the facts thank you.

Claiming Hemo have a cure for all viruses and cancer, yet funding is proving difficult is incredulous.

AIMO

JFH,

We agree substantial funding’s required, the company have stated the same.

Where we strongly disagree is the type and reasons effecting it’s ease of availability or otherwise.

Your argument (in writing), the company has a cure for all known viruses and cancer, (AML) I presume?

They don’t but let’s run with you claims for argument sake.

So considering the above professional investors overlook investing and instead are making it very difficult to get the required funding by shorting the stock because they believe…what exactly ?

A very obtuse argument !

I on the other hand believe, Hemo’ has an embryonic opportunity to try a Possible treatment for AML, a renowned and difficult arena for drug development.

Professional investors know how the odds are unfortunately stacked against the company and that’s why funding might be difficult to secure.

A bit more straight forward and obvious argument don’t you think!?

I suppose should a stinging dilutive funding hit present investors, you’ll then blame those same shorters and conveniently step over the Elephant in the room,

… the reality of just where the company are on the path to those cures you claim and that’s definitely not where you state.

Stop blaming others for the difficulties, it’s simply a function of the AML drug development arena Hemo have entered.

Please note my use of the word “ unfortunately “ .

Would any reasonable person really not want a successful treatment for AML .

AIMO

JFH,

I’m nervous! … take a look at your own posts!

“Substantial funding will be required by the Company during the clinical trial phase and further funding will be sought by the Company prior to the commencement of the Phase I clinical trials.”

The above a company statement .

So the only question is, will it be dilutive for present holders or not.

I maintain, history says it will.

Let’s see.

AIMO

Ps. When did Hemo’ develop a cure for cancer and all known viruses as you claim? I must have missed that RNS.

Chris,

Maybe i will ,when there’s clarity on funding.

GLA

AIMO

Chris,

That’s the type of post that should be encouraged.

A witty and jovial expression of an alternate opinion and not the venomous attack I usually attract.

Maybe that’s because you’re not as desperate as some others, whichever…nice post👍

Or maybe sat on a yacht in the Caribbean .Tilly knows I’m a sailor.

…be more open minded to alternative views within your investments and maybe you could do the same!

AIMO

Mr I,

When a poster dare question the narrative the gang wish to promote, presently being…

”there’s no chance of a diluting fund raise”,

Use all the tricks in the book to discredit, ie he/she they are short, want to buy in lower, bury the post, change the thread …and so on.

I’m afraid the gangs tactics are too obvious as is evident .

And just to remind you, who was it that correctly identified the risk of a CH and was harangued by the gang for doing so?

Same old !

Considering the information available,I believe there’s a significant risk of a large dilutive fund raise.

Let’s see who turns out to be correct.

AIMO