Member Info for stt1

Hallsworthy,

"a fall of over 20% in the first minute of trading is not to be talked about so lightly."

The sp is back to where it was ONE week ago.

There were hundreds of small trades in the 1st minute, which I was expecting anyway.

Hallsworthy

"She resigned because the financials are disgusting. "

You made a statement. It's not an opinion but you've no evidence to back it up.

I've forwarded your post and statement re ex-CFO to the company.

Hallsworthy,

"She resigned because the financials are disgusting. "

Can you post the evidence that the CFO resigned because of the financials were disgusting or are you lying again?

As to the results, the company has been saying for over a year the environment is tough for NHS/TLY. Nothing new.

That's exactly why they started taking action last year and in their presentation have clearly stated they have restructured.

The financials are 4 months old.

The outlook is reasonable.

Hallsworthy,

" Patently obvious why the CFO ran a mile"

Is it, why did she resign?

The CFO resigned several months ago. The TU clearly shows things have improved and forecast to improve.

At least the sitting Chairman hasn't dumped ALL his shares less than a week after a TU, like the one at HVO, which is why you and your HVO mates are here, deramping.

Hallsworthy,

"Huge sign of what's to come"

Why is it a huge sign of what's to come?

It's no different from saying Chairman dumping all his shares as a huge sign of what other investors might do.

The chairman knows more than any IIs or BB poster.

IIs buy using client money, the chairman was using his own.

What happens at TLY doesn't really impact me but HVO posters love to talk about TLY when the sp is down and prefer to say "who cares" when TLY win contracts.

TLY is an illiquid share, small trades manipulate the sp. There's hundreds of trades (yet only a handful of PIs) and HVO posters deramping it today. Coincidence?

At least at TLY the Chairman was adding and IIs hold c40%.

What about the Chairman at HVO. He dumped all his holding.

;-)

Currently there are > 7m patients waiting in NHS England alone. Many millions more in the other UK Nations and Ireland. Obviously all with different clinical problems.

TLY have treated only around 175k, as per their presentation.

Labour are determined to reduce the waiting lists and are in favour of using private providers. They have also stated they will get staff working on weekends and evening, the model which TLY use.

There is huge opportunity to treat more patients.

Skywalker

"Well at least now any concern of CF selling shares and affecting the share price in the future has now gone."

Why do you think the concern has gone?

If anything, the sitting Chairman dumping all his shares begs the question "what does he know"?

CF had a significant holding.

I don't see it as a clean slate, I see it as a big red flag going forward.

TooGood,

The financials are for year ending 31st March, 4 months old.

The company said last year that things remain challenging, so it was expected.

We now have a new govn.

One of the major problems impacting NHS has been the junior doctors strike.

Labour are currently in talks to resolve this.

Labour are also determined to bring down waiting lists.

Note: hundreds of small trades. There are only a few PIs.

Similar like last year after Nano crashed.

Is that a coincidence TooGood??

Dustofnations,

"Logically, one would expect this to be where CF is putting that cash." (EGT)

"CF seems to like making high-risk early stage investments where he can have a big impact, retains control, and has the opportunity to (for example) 20x+ his return very quickly. That's fair enough."

CF isn't just ANY investor in HVO, is he?. He is the CURRENT, sitting Chairman. Therefore, the Chairman first dumping majority of his holding and then dumping the remaining is a real concern.

It's not fair enough for a sitting Chairman to dump all his holding.

It's a red flag.

The Chairman knows more about the company and it's prospects than any II or BB poster.

If he had left and then sold then it's a different matter.

Given CF has now dumped shares in HVO twice, why wouldn't he do so on other ventures as well??

"Yet back with HVO, I am very pleased with Mo and the team, and the serially successful results speak volumes about the direction of the company — but, it's not a high-risk early stage business any more. HVO has become a mature, steady growth company, which is held as a 'core portfolio' asset by various IIs and punters like me"

Classic! don't worry about HVO, keep invested. The CEO, who has >7m options, due to be exercisable from few months time would want the sp to remain at current levels or higher, as he has the incentive (>7m options) to talk the company up!

Mdle

"I expect Cathal is eyeing a quicker return in POLB or one of his other investment hence the sell"

"what would we have done if in his shoes."

He IS the current Chairman. If it was an II or other PI, or the snr exec top sliced then it's not so bad. But the current sitting chairman!! That sends the wrong message to the market.

The current Chairman should look out for the company 1st, not his pocket.

Why wouldn't he do the same at other company's where he's a snr exec?

User

"It was made clear he would be exiting. It is no shock."

Was it? Where?

When I raised the 1st lot of selling as a red flag, several suggested the Chairman had only sold some, retained a significant amount and therefore it wasn't a red flag.

You now claiming, in hindsight, that it was obvious.

;-)

Vspl,

The thing to watch is posters who try and claim everything is fine, trying to suggest things will improve. They usually say this so the sp doesn't crash and helps whilst they are selling their own holdings.

I think there's several multiple ids at work here. Admin should look into them.

Hotchip

"SP has done ok today, given the news "

The rns came out at 2.48pm, so only around 1.5hrs before closing time, not much for PIs to react.

I think if it was a 7am rns there would have been a sharper fall.

The sitting chairman dumping all his shares is major concern.

Moniman

" someone has bought nearly 9% of the company from the Chairman in the past few months at nearly 30p"

No they haven't. IIs have used someone else's money, client money, to buy shares here. CF sold his personal shares, held by via investment company.

Crucial difference.

Geordie

"The key word there is 'short term', a couple of contract wins over summer and we'll be back on track and this will all be old news. "

Not really, the Chairman dumped majority of his holding 5 months ago and it wasn't forgotten. Some took that as a signal to sell, as a red flag.

Today, just makes the red flag a big red flag.

If the Chairman had left and then sold his holding then it makes sense but for a sitting Chairman to dump all his shares is a big red flag.

"Nothing has changed from the awesome update last week"

You think it's a pure coincidence that just a few days after the company was being talked up that the Chairman dumped all his holding? Really?

The lack of revenue growth rate, the falling order book, the lack of contracts had nothing to do with the Chairman's decision to sell???? Really?

I think the Chairman knows more about the business than IIs or BB posters.

I think there is a questionable business model.

Vspl,

always best to read the newsflow and both pros and cons.

Look at Byot/Trmr/Rthm/Tap... same thing happened at those. I warned of the red flags, gang were saying similar to here... ignore sst1 or resorted to personal abuse or sp was manipulated higher with lots of small trades.

Several posters have gone quiet - they appear and disappear together!!

Chris,

"He could let the share price ride higher to meet that demand and reward existing shareholders.

Why didn't he? It's not as if he's short of money.

IIs buy using client's money. When a company is talked up, some investors, PIs or IIs will buy in believing the hype.

The Chairman selling is a big red flag.

"My guy feel is that Hvivo growth rates will start to plateau despite the new bigger facility"

That's exactly my assertion has been, lack of revenue growth rate and order book has fallen.

Newsflow has been as predicted.

CEO has huge >7m options. It's a red flag as those options were only awarded last year, crucially back dated a year, so they are exercisable in few months time.

The company is being talked up.

There you go, as predicted.

The Chairman dumped majority of his holding in a discounted placing at 28p only a few months ago. I said that's a red flag.

Now he dumps the remaining holding. Everything.

I believe the Chairman knows more about the company than any II or BB poster.

Given the company supposedly has great prospects, why dump your entire holding when it was clearly stated that he had agreed not to.

Company talked up and sells, all as predicited.

There you go, exactly as predicted.

The Chairman dumped his remaining holding.

Why would the Chairman dump all his holding if the company has great growth prospects?