RE: Re Research note24 Oct 2016 16:51
Hi Miker,
Thanks for your comment. I say it's irrelevant to ONZ as ONZ no longer have a holding in GWIK. You will also see a revised note on PREM today taking into account some of the critiques I received over the weekend. My aim is to generate articles that are balanced, and I appreciate that with PREM I may have been overly negative without taking into account the speculative nature of aim. Future notes will also address the speculative element of AIM, but if I'm asked to do a piece on a company and I wouldn't personally invest in it - I will say so, but always give my reasons.
This note I have put onto a couple of other boards only because the respective companies are mentioned therein. Of course I want a reaction, I want people to read the articles that I took the time to write at the end of the day. I also want comments and critiques so I can develop the format of my work to appeal to readers.
I'm more risk adverse nowadays and don't hold any positions in AIM companies, so am only researching them on request from readers. I'm sure I will come accross ones that I would invest in as time goes on, and my opinion of the stocks covered are always subject to change.
Thanks you for taking the time to read the article. ATB