Member Info for Stoops

Haha you are a shill. Go take your money and put it there then. Thats the point you wouldn’t “ cause none of those company’s were set up like pensana with such little money put in for such gain at the end. You are the hater.

Lynas is the safe bet then you should take it!

Oscar,

You have spent so long staring at the risks that you’ve become emotionally attached to them.

The rest of us are looking at the project.

What other Western rare earth developer is further advanced?

Which one has shown more persistence?

Which one spent years warning about the exact supply-chain problem that governments are only now waking up to?

You keep presenting uncertainty as though you’ve discovered a state secret.

Congratulations. Development projects involve risk.

Next you’ll be telling us water is wet.

If there’s a better rare earth gamble, name it.

If not, you’re just reading the same shopping list of risks every day and calling it analysis

Probably because you’re such a whiner. Whine whine whine.

Most people come back from a holiday with photos Oscar comes back with an alibi. Shill much?

Oscar Oscar were for art thou! Haha

Was that a lightbulb moment for you? Dude you coined

the term muppet. At this point I feel sorry for you. Saying the same thing over and over. On a public forum.

But I just thought I’d troll the troll. Nah mean old timer?

Eye for an eye tooth for a tooth. Your relentless needy, greedy posts actually suck. I heard you bought at 120? Even tho you had been in the loop? Just relax we’ll be fine in the end

You really are a bit dim.

I’m mirroring you don’t you see? I would never call someone a muppet…

Someone needs to send a welfare check on this codger.

Maybe the fixated persons unit.

Anyway have a good weekend gents.

It’s been fun

Nice use of your ai to backtrack muppet.

For someone who prides himself on using “simple and unambiguous language”, you seem strangely upset that people interpreted:

“only interested because his anonymous employers are paying him well”

exactly the way it was written.

You loaded the sentence, then complained when people noticed the load.

Pathetic.

You do know this is just a sport ?

Oscar,

That might be the fastest retreat on this board all year.

First Lloyd is only interested because he’s being paid by mysterious anonymous employers.

Then, after a bit of pushback, it suddenly becomes: “I was merely explaining why Lloyd is interested.”

No, Oscar. You weren’t.

You were trying to imply there was something suspicious about his involvement. Now that nobody bought it, you’ve quietly repackaged the argument as a boring statement of fact.

It’s like watching someone throw a grenade and then insist they were only demonstrating how a pin works.

The best part is that your big revelation was that a nominated director represents the interests of the investor who nominated him.

Absolutely groundbreaking stuff.

Oscar,

We know you’re a Paul Atherley hater. That’s been obvious for ever Paul must have stolen your lunch money. . But now Lloyd Pengilly has apparently joined the enemies list as well.

Your argument seems to be that Lloyd is only on the board because Cascade nominated him and he’s paid to represent their interests.

Congratulations. You’ve just described the purpose of a nominated director.

That’s not some shocking revelation. That’s literally how strategic investors protect their investment.

You speak as if you’ve uncovered a sinister conspiracy when in reality you’ve discovered corporate governance.

As for Lloyd being “only interested” because he’s paid, that’s a strange standard. Are Paul, the other directors, the auditors and the lawyers all only interested because they’re paid too? Or does that logic only apply to people you’ve decided not to like?

The irony is that if Cascade had invested tens of millions and didn’t want board representation, you’d probably be on here demanding to know why they weren’t exercising oversight.

So Lloyd is either a puppet because he’s on the board, or negligent because he isn’t. Conveniently, the answer is always whatever lets you complain the most.

At this point you’re proving everyone’s suspicions you need to tone it down a lot.

Paul lives rent free in your deluded head. It’s very entertaining imagining you wiping the cheetos off your lap

It’s always amusing watching the forum tough guys transform into delicate defenders of civility.

After years of insults, mockery and condescension, we’re now being lectured about personal abuse and respectful debate.

A truly miraculous conversion.

Wah wah.

The three biggest bullies on the forum have somehow managed to become the victims. After years of dishing it out, they get a taste of their own medicine and immediately sprint to the principal’s office clutching their pearls.

Remarkable scenes. Never has so much bravado collapsed so quickly.

Hilarious. Clutch your pearls! I’ll give you one thing you are a relentless troll. As far as trolls go your a king!

Hey Oscar. Who’s the tripper now? You might need to go running for the shelter of your mother’s little helper! It will help you on your way get you through your busy day!

Oscar,

A heroic dose of mushrooms might do you some good. There’s a fair chance that once your inflated ego evaporates, you’ll emerge with the shocking realisation that you’re not the oracle you imagine yourself to be, just another bloke talking rubbish on an internet forum.

I suspect we’d hear a lot less from you afterwards.

Oscar lives in a fantasy where he’s the protagonist, the narrator, the analyst, and the victim all at once. Everyone else is just an extra. The tragedy is that while he thinks he’s delivering wisdom to the masses, the masses are mostly wondering whether he’ll ever discover that the world carried on perfectly well before he arrived and will continue doing so long after he’s stopped posting.

OG Oscar the grouch.

Once again, you are confusing "I haven't been told" with "it isn't happening."

Let's examine your three complaints.

The Sable transaction:

You repeatedly assert that because 89 days have passed, there must be an update due to the market.

That is not how disclosure rules work.

The passage of time is not inside information.

A calendar is not inside information.

You have presented no evidence that the transaction has failed, been cancelled, or materially changed.

Your entire argument is based on the fact that you are impatient.

Concrete pours:

This is perhaps the weakest part of your post.

You claim Pensana must tell the market whether concrete pours have happened.

Why?

Shareholders have already observed significant progress at site through recent satellite imagery showing ongoing construction activity and development.

The physical project is visibly advancing.

So where is the evidence of a problem?

You have none.

You are attempting to manufacture concern from a lack of announcements despite visible evidence that work continues.

Drilling:

Pensana stated that drilling activities were expected during the dry season from May to October.

Today is 1 June.

The dry season has barely begun.

Yet somehow you have already promoted this into a missed milestone.

That is extraordinary.

By your logic, a six-month programme becomes "delayed" after a few weeks simply because you have not received an RNS confirming a drill rig has arrived.

The common theme in all three examples is the same.

No evidence of cancellation.

No evidence of failure.

No evidence of a material adverse change.

No evidence of a disclosure breach.

Just Oscar repeatedly substituting speculation for facts.

You are entitled to ask for an update.

You are not entitled to present your assumptions as evidence.

At this point, your posts tell us far more about your impatience than they do about Pensana

Oscar, “poor sod”

Congratulations on discovering that calendars exist.

Your entire thesis appears to be:

“89 days have passed, I don’t know what’s happening, therefore there must be undisclosed inside information.”

That’s not analysis. That’s a toddler’s understanding of corporate law.

You repeatedly make the mistake of confusing “I haven’t been told” with “the company is breaking regulations.”

You have absolutely no idea what stage the documentation is at. You have absolutely no idea what conditions remain outstanding. You have absolutely no idea what discussions are occurring between the parties.

Yet somehow you’ve appointed yourself prosecutor, judge and jury on an alleged UK MAR breach.

Remarkable.

My favourite part is where you confidently declare that the information must be inside information. Not “might be”. Not “could be”. Must be.

Based on what?

Not evidence.

Not facts.

Not knowledge.

Just Oscar’s feelings.

The same feelings that have produced a spectacular collection of incorrect assertions over the years.

Then we move onto concrete pours and drilling rigs.

A company says something is scheduled for April or expected in May, and when no RNS arrives on your preferred timetable you immediately leap to “perhaps the market is being misled.”

Have you ever encountered a construction project before?

Or a mine?

Or, indeed, reality?

Delays happen. Documentation takes time. Negotiations take time. Regulatory processes take time.

None of this is evidence of anything other than your impatience.

What you’ve actually demonstrated is not that Pensana has breached UK MAR.

You’ve demonstrated that you don’t know the difference between a question and an accusation.

“Can shareholders have an update?”

Perfectly reasonable.

“I haven’t received an update therefore there may be a disclosure breach.”

Speculative.

“There is inside information and UK MAR requires disclosure.”

That’s the point where you wandered out of the realm of facts and into fan fiction.

Amazing progress Oscar. You admitted you were wrong. But sadly you couldn’t help yourself yet again and had to continue forcing your hand.

Once again.

You and SP need to go have a picnic at salt end

RNS shortly !

What’s fascinating is that Oscar never actually addresses the substance of anything said to him.

The moment someone points out:

* the exaggerated timelines,

* the obsessive scoreboard mentality,

* the constant legal theatre,

* or the obvious emotional overinvestment…

…he immediately retreats into:

“LSD hallucinations”

or

“save it for Telegram.”

Why?

Because insults are easier than self-awareness.

The reality is nobody said shareholders don’t deserve updates. Most people would agree that after more than three weeks since the last RNS — and over six weeks since the substantive strategic investment update — the market would appreciate some clarity.

But Oscar doesn’t just want updates.

He wants existential reassurance.

That’s why every delay becomes:

* “inside information,”

* “false markets,”

* “continuous disclosure obligations,”

* and now apparently a football match where he’s “2-0 up” against strangers who stopped replying.

It’s difficult to take seriously a man who speaks like a combination of:

* a panicked compliance officer,

* a failed barrister,

* and someone refreshing ADVFN at 1am searching for emotional closure through PDF timestamps.

Then the moment he gets mocked for behaving absurdly, he suddenly abandons all the pseudo-legal seriousness and starts throwing playground insults with absolutely no foundation whatsoever.

Which, ironically, says far more about his emotional state than anyone else’s.