Member Info for stokey12

BumbleB - I would ask how far did he use his knowledge and contacts to facilitate meetings that could have led to central government funding to speed up the research into the technology.

Kenny100 reference your 17.51 post of yesterday. That is less than a DMG unit that produces hydrogen will do. A tonne of hydrogen will power about 200 cars so on the basis that a DMG unit will work for 350 days that is the equivalent of 70,000 cars from one DMG unit, That is more than three times as many as the carbon capture scheme.

Piltick - I was thinking along similar lines. About the only use former MPs are is with the contacts and knowledge of Parliament so I would of thought that he would be submitting evidence to the relevant select committees.As far as I can see so far he has not. There is a time lag between making a submission and it being published so maybe he has and it has not been published yet.

I have just noticed that the secretary of state will be appearing before the select committee on the 25 July in relation to an inquiry into the net zero carbon emission target. If anyone wants to write to the committee in advance to raise the issue of DMG technology and whether it needs greater government investment the email address is beiscom@parliament.uk

Rosewall - I think the reason is that there has been some slippage in the timetable hopefully not much and the application will be in soon.

Interestingly PHE is on the map.

Audible - I am not sure if there is a summary. I think that may be the summary.

I have uploaded the following article https://jmp.sh/wm7eywv. It is for a different process to DMG but it is also a gasification process using Ultra High Tempretures. Of particular note is that it concludes that the process is Carbon Negative and has other benefits. This seriously undermines the environmental case against allowing a DMG plant. I have emailed it to David Ryan and John Hall at Waste2Tricity.

Kenny100 - Thanks for these links interestingly when you look under the firt link Ince Resource Park is protected from uses other waste management. So, somebody with knowledge of planning will correct me if I am wrong, a planning application for a waste managemen t facility at Ince should go through.

LedZep - While you are there can you lookout for any planning notices and let us have the planning ref fro them.

Thanks

BumbleB - if there are more shares then PHE will reach the £600m MCap sooner. When it reaches the £600m MCap is dependent in my view on the number of international orders recieved.

The problem with Chna is that it does not have a good reputation with regards to IP protection so I would be worried with PHE doing business there until it has a worldwide patent or strong guarantees in relation to IP protection

I should point out that they still seem to be acepting evidence so if anybody else is inclined to submit evidence feel free.

I have just noticed that this has been published http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/environment-food-and-rural-affairs-committee/plastic-food-and-drink-packaging/written/102523.pdf. Some of you might find it of interest. Care was taken to do a blatant plug for PHE.

I think a good first target for revenues is the £8.3m made by Ceres Power for the six months to March 2019. They have a similar business model to PHE. Also they are looking to open a CHP plant in Japan this year.

Newboy58 - You should pay attention to the date better. It was obvious that the Annual Report and Accounts would be released either today or tomorrow.

Jabberba - What news does your 11.07 refer to I assume you are refering to news that PHE has already announced.

reece - For me the main takeaway is that total assets exceed liabilities so that in realtion to the assets PHE are showing a surplus. This is hopeful for the future if commercial viability can be proved.

reece What RNS is your subject line referring to?

Piltick - I have just been looking at ITM's financial if PHE was to start selling Hydrogen in the £5 - £8 range this would cause ITM serious problems. This is because they are loss making at the moment and have to rely on grant income to narrow losses so they would not be able to compete without increasing losses.