Member Info for stokey12

whatamess In relation to your 08.03 post you have obviously never heard of an interim injunction which effetively says just that.

Speedy_Gonzalez In relation to your 20.59 post I was aware that any challenge would have to be by way ofa JR application. My point was that the state of the court lists is that even a totally without merit application can cause significant delay while the court processes it.

I have just come across this story https://www.larnetimes.co.uk/news/environment/linda-hits-waves-support-no-gas-caverns-campaign-2966045 looks like the local opposition are getting ready for a legal fight. Unless the Northern Ireland Courts are less log jammed than there England counterpart any legal dispute will go on possibly for years with appeals. Infa may want to start looking seriously at a Private Act of Parliament.

piscio In relation to your 18.13 post I am inclined to think that all the parties are trying to settle this matter that is why we have a date of 10 December. I am unable to reconcile how the date of December was reached if the waiver of service was in September. If the matter is not settled by 10 December then Defences will be filed.

It is interesting to note that the other two Defendats are using the same Attorney.

piscio In relation to your 17.59 post see my 13.54 and 14.12 posts which gives the current position.

Kingsmen - In relation to your 15.39 post the agreement between Peel and PHE is unlikely to be the cause of the share price going down. The reason I say that is because the PHE model is based on Peel developing all the enquires in the UK.

Speedy_Gonzalez In relation to your 14.03 post it is interesting especially if you were to google Seena Shah the Head of Marketing.

abdalian - In relation to your 13.50 post are ou referring to the shares that were issued last week or the warrants that were issued at the same time? They are not the same thing. I have not checked but if I recall correctly the warrants were only issued to Peel for a specifi reason. As faar as the shares ere concerned I do not believe any of them have gone into the market as they were all sold to investors who are either like the White family committed to the company or are holding them for tax reasons.

Norfolk95 -The link is to two documents one is a draft order the second is to a stipulation that all the parties agree to the order being sought. The order requires defences to be filed by 10 December 2020 and that the hearing on 8 October 2020 is set aside. So unless it is settled first all the defences have to be in on or before 10 December 2020.

Norfolk95 In relation to your 11.41 post please see the most recent filed documents on this link https://jmp.sh/sRY0wP7 I am not sure why there was a waiver of service.

Once we get the ML how long will it take to construct the first of the seven caverns and revenues to start being generated?

Piltick In relation to your 11.54 post my questions related to where it is expected growth will come from over the next 3 - 5 years. I also asked about the speed of delivery of DMG units. I also questioned why we were not having an online AGM.

surprised In relation to your 07.55 post to enhance shareholder value TPG needs as others have said to generate revenues AND profits. At present it seems to be doing the first but not the second. This agreement does nothing to change this.

Surprised thanks for your 07.25 post. This is a non revenue generating RNS and as far as the UK is concerned they are behind Alstom the train builder who is already deploying Hydrogen trains in Germany and are awaiting the order from the DfT to deploy in the UK. I do not see how this will generate anything in the short term.

Dr,Anomaly In relation to your 16.14 post. The full twitter chain is here https://twitter.com/BBCNews/status/1306215880733401088

Loosegoose In relation to your 16.45 post I did notice that and I am following up on that.

Loosegoose - I have just checked and the signifcant shareholders hold a total of 40.6%. I am not sure if any of them increased thier holdings. I am not sure if there is anywhere of getting a complete list of shareholdrs other than asking the company secretary or the company registrar.

Forgot the link https://twitter.com/Michael38551821/status/1306225361601146881

This tweeter feed and the BBC article referred to in the original tweet it does raise an interesting point about plug in hybrids.

QuantumStar In relation to your 13.40 post while the linked video is important it does not relate to iNFA and you should have flagged it as off topic.