RE: Wigster8 Feb 2025 16:00
Let me decode and tell you what is going on based on my observations.
Proquo, most likely is a made up story of him being part of a pressure group lobbying for Parliament and pan- European legislators to pass social media anonymous postings legislation.
Why I say this?
For one, his own view is very biased and not from a neutral standpoint. You can look back on his post and he is ramper.
Two, there is no hard evidence of his so-called group. Name of the group?
He had not responded to my questions and I don't think he ever will. If he does respond, I don't think the response will have any meaningful context neither based on his historic posts.
Three, if he was really part of an important group with the capabilities to pass legislations, then he, more than anyone else should know the boundaries of doxing and breaking the LSE rules.
Once again, it highlights how desperate the long term holders are to result in such cheap tactics, to threaten anyone who dare post facts about the company, to silence them on exposing the company's weak financial position, and the problems they are currently facing.
The irony though, the post started with the subject of anonymous posters spreading misinformation and market abuse.
Proquo comes to mind?