RE: warrants13 Jun 2020 10:59
Spikej, you ask me a question which none of us here will know the answer to. Not even you. He gave shares to new Directors last December from his own holding to avoid shareholders being diluted. That is the only clue we have as to how he could have acted with the warrants. Either he gave them up or was prevented by some rule which we are not aware of , or it was simply they expired and that's it.
You really are clutching at straws for reasons that we would like to know. That is the real question here. Why is Spikeyj so interested in what happened to the warrants? Why would he have so much against a share currently in suspension but being all well as a Nomad has just been appointed when he and others were saying it would never happen?