Member Info for stockdale

Listened to that. Concise is not a word I'd use with Naheed. Many would have missed much of what she says as they'd dose off. Clear and concise is what investors need. 22 minutes of mostly monologue.

I often see posters blaming investors for not reading up on the detail of this stuff before they sell. It's the responsibility of the company to make the investment case clear and concise. Selling damages the company. The investor may lose out without knowing if they are ignorant but the company is reliant on buyers who do understand the investment case and will lose out with sellers who don't.

It may be simple to Tony but not everyone finds it simple. Many are also not able to listen in and go on the sentiment. The sentiment is damaged by a 12 to 18 months figure. That's simple.

Thanks Sharealot. It's normally such a good platform that such an inconvenience is more noticeable.

HL are still not showing recent trades. Temporarily unavailable appears to be several weeks.

Looking at NEX and the Stock Exchange website it would seem the spread is around 0.73p to 0.79p.

Quite a wide official spread currently at 0.70p to 0.85p. Actual spread will be narrower of course. It needs to narrow to get this moving.

But it does look like the SP is reacting positively?

Have to dig out the trades from NEX or the Stock Exchange website. If they show them.

A further issue with HL is the lack of live trades. There's just been an apology in its place for some weeks now explaining they've had a change of provider and hope to fix it.

Despite the good RNSes the SP hasn't responded as sellers still seem to lack confidence in the company. An MCap of around £14 million only with a project this large is minuscule.

Yeah, but there's no competition from the Democrats.

AT 0.75p the MCap is about £14 million. Look at the potential valuation and you'll see how a substantial increase in MCap is expected.

Not sure it's a good idea to view these things from a personal preference. I would assume the BoD will know the best course of action. However that will be from the view of the company. We need to make sure our view aligns with the company's.

Having slipped back to $26.7 Brent has recovered to $27 and hopefully higher. PFC should respond to that.

The whole World's economy is dropping. Some will be less effected but in general we're all in this together. So we'll all start again from a lower base.

The perverse part is the oil price. Producing at the rate they are under Covid 19 is perverse.

Someone alto? We've all known it. However it's necessary to put life before money. No point having an economy if there's no one left to enjoy it.

https://www.globalcapital.com/article/b1l0bfg2h8mypd/boe-gives-uk-banks-no-choice-but-to-suspend-dividends-bonuses

The regulatory body for banks has no influence over GSK or RIO as they aren't banks. The government is influencing the companies they can. I believe it's also largely because some banks were bailed out after 2008 and the government feel the public are on their side to get the banks to help. Unfortunately that means shareholders suffer, again.

Oil price having jumped up to $27 from $24 PFC's SP has responded.

Trump's answer to the feud was to say they were topping up their strategic oil reserves with cheap oil as a dig at the two feuding countries to deflect the argument that fracking companies would be damaged in the U.S..

If Russia and Saudi Arabia were to stop their feud the oil price should rise again. I find it hard to believe the oil price is down at $25 when it had been $120 and we were supposed to be completely out of oil reserves 20 years ago at the turn of the century. Cheap oil is not good for the environment and not needed at this time when people are not moving around the World and industries are being shut down.