Member Info for Steady_Aim_Fire

Each to their own opinion and I respect that you feel that way. Obviously I disagree bit we both have our rationale

Make your own decisions, no point calling them W**Kers just because you listened and didn't make your own decision.

I seem to remember you say you sold some and bought in cheaper... I'd shudder to think how high we'd be if you hadn't lololol

Now away off and wipe you're nose, it's covered in brown

AreYouDoubting
Yes, it's exactly the same Guzzler who sees patterns in the 666 selling figures when it's likely him doing the selling just to create a talking point
#tinfoilhatcrew

I wasn't invested at the first pump so I don't comment on that. Sorry if I wasn't clear on that.
However, I still fundamentally don't believe the most recent placing was deliberately misleading.
As has been pointed out by parties on both sides of the fence here, AIM changes rapidly. I invested half way through last year knowing fully (its happened to me before in other investments) that if something happens at short notice and there is no decision time to consult with shareholders, then the BoD is going to make a call that they may think is the best decision at the time on behalf of the shareholders. The main reason I don't think they've been misleading is the amount t of skin they have in the game. They have done themselves just as much dilution as they jave done us. It therefore effects us all equally.

I've been in shares where the BoD has little skin in the game, takes a whopping salary and will create a placing to continue paying themselves a whopping salary. That is misleading. What MOS BoD did was not that so I respectfully disagree. Do you perhaps feel it was misleading due to the relative value of your investment decreasing and due to the sudden nature of the transaction?

You're the dimwit failing to understand a very clear set of fundamentals... who is really the dimwit here?

"Oh if it wasn't for citi I shudder to think where the SP would be" who is psychophantic again Guz?
Maybe invest in a mirror? Might be less stressful for you

Guzzler, You can get all defensive if you want but there's nobody on this board who likes to brown nose the BoD or Citi every so often more than you so do us all a favour and hop off that Shetland pony you call a high horse.
You clearly don't trust the board, you clearly don't trust the fundamentals here so why are you still invested?
I maintain, the fundamentals are still really strong, IMO, the board hasn't mislead us in the slightest, they have had a placing which, to them was the right thing to do and by investing in them, you trust them to do the right thing. If you don't like it, find a new share to moan about ??

Pick a side for once Guzzler.
I've seen tennis matches with less back and forth than your constant positive/negative swings!

There's been no playing of any fiddles from the BoD here I don't think. As I've stated before here and on other platforms, there was an opportunity and the BoD decided to take it. That opportunity cost money and the BoD decided not to burn existing reserves but to generate it from a placing.

Yes, I agree the timing of this occurring wasn't the best but at the same time neither the BoD, the company, its investors, Gfin or anyone else for that matter had any form of control there. You seem to expect the BoD to simply pull magical news out of thin air. Wake up bud and understand business just doesn't work like that. If you don't like the shape of it, sell up and take you whinging with you. It's as simple as that.

For the less volatile/more rational of readers, I still see huge intrinsic value here. I agree that in that I would have expected the Gfin updates out sooner than now but again, if its Gfin, legals or the sheer complexity of the agreement holding things up then there's nothing we can do there. For me, given how active we know the BoD are and how often they have gone out of their way to update us, I see this current quiet period as a massive plus. This means something is happening. Whether it's one massive thing or a number of decent contracts, I have no idea but this silence is convincing me that news is coming, more than just rev related and that it's going to be a biggie.

No insider BS, just reading what I'm seeing in front of me.

I sense a fast backtrack and an easy way out Itacon...
I reckon you think youve got a source but don't want to be labelled as ramping or an insder lololol

I expect the company has exposure to a lot of different elements in this overall online industry. There is plenty of tech that can use NFT and blockchain tech for alternative uses than the popular images we see online right now. As long as we are diversified, I don't have an issue with it.

Though we'll be dealing with them on multiple fronts, I believe a lot of the nfts we have been dealing with just now are based in-game, in-app etc. Which are completely different to randomly created NFTs traded on the open market at present. It's like 2 mini industries.

Although nfts took a hit recently, in-game and in-app purchases, play-to-earn and other similar strategies for rev generation have never been stronger.

Patience is the word of the day! Only a matter if time now and that's just the things we know about, let alone anything else they have brewing!

On your bike buster. Have you had your stabilisers removed yet?

Bought my cheapest ever tranche this morning at 0.2755p. Cannot believe my luck there and the ability to average down a little while we wait for news.

News and revenue updates won't be far away now, we've got a lot going on including but not limited to;

Huawei
ISBA
India Livescores
India Vodafone
Arcade App
Gfin
IGS and Battleriff
Fanzine
4 B2B contracts in India, Turkey, Italy and Africa,
Netherlands imaging
Livescores in Mexico, Argentina & Brazil,
Tappit,
ANOTHER China

There's a lot to come here and a huge new market to capitalise on.

I disagree entirely because then we'd be under the impression that the rev updates we have been given in the year so far are nothing to do with IGS. They cannot lie and say "revs are actually X when really they are Y but we're hiding some from you"
I don't see how they could have been more transparent given that they gant make sweeping comments about the Contract being back ended in an RNS.
What don't you understand about this? All we should be wanting to see is continual, sustainable growth which takes us to profit. If a chunky of that is IGS one month and not the next then who cares so long as the base line figures are moving Noeth and profitability is achieved.

I agree entirely that transparency is important but comparing transparency to knowing all of the business secrets and the spread of profit generation are 2 very different things when we're going through growth like this.
Unless on the BOD or at Senior Management level where confidentiality is implied, I would never disclose that level of information for my own company to anyone.
We will perhaps one day get to hear the revenue figures for individual arms of the company but as time goes on, we'll get further and further away from hearing about nitty gritty contract details.

Guzzler, i was calling you out for your constant positive/negative swaying without any change in fundamental information presented by the board. The fact you think I would would waste time giving you instructions amuses me.
Also, where do you think I've concluded anything about revenue figures... it's something I don't think I've recently put a hard figure against. I'd love to see circa £300k per month on but again, I'm here for the long term where £300k is weekly or even daily figure. I may have speculated what figure might be if the contract is back-ended but O wouldn't think I've tried to claim what the figure is or is not because (unlike you) I accept the fact the company cannot divulge certain info.

Change the record Guzzler.
You've been on and on and on about rev breakdown for ages and the company has clearly said they won't be doing it.
Accept that IGS is back-loaded, accept what the figure is and that its a minimum and accept that its going to be delivered in one way or another by the end of 6 months.
Move on.

There seems to be a lot of inexperience or trolling going on here Nookie. I agree the placings were not the best in terms of their handling but both were for the right reasons IMO.
As for anything that ME or the rest of the BOD "owe" us you can get on your bike and pedal off. Compared to previous BoD, this is lightyears better. Were actually going somewhere, we're ahead of the times for once and we have businesses seeking us out for deals rather than the other way round.
The fact that people who are used to making a quick fiver on a punt down the bookies don't have the experience to wait and allow a company to form doesn't concern me in the slightest. Its their loss.

I have averaged down whenever funds have become available over the past 6 months. Haven't sold a penny since I started to invest here. Just slowly increasing my own holding when funds permit.

I don't think anyone is trying to insult you by calling you a trader, it's just that traders preferences (asking for spikes) are very different from LTH who typically want the long term behaviour of a stock to be consistant. I dont know many LTH tthat would ask for large swings or spikes unless they were trading. That being said, the fact that you are buying and selling a stock repetitively by definition means you're trading. Don't know why you have an issue with this though.
My own experience is that a lot of the big online traders on twitter etc. who claim to be LTH are really only claiming so in order to encourage their followers into buying while in fact they are trading frantically and profiting off the back of their followers.