Member Info for Steady_Aim_Fire

I've never disputed anything you're talking about Itacon, I legit don't know what angle you're coming from here.
Of course it's supporters who spend money but do you reckon they'd prefer to get their NFTs from the club they support or from a fan website that isnt part of the club itself?

Correct Sophie.
To give an example;
If Dani Alves created and minted his own set of NFTs, limited edition etc. And put them up for auction, then they would go for max value in a heartbeat because Dani is super pro NFT, he's got a huge commercial influence, massive marketing support and in his world he's a legend.
The let's say, the creator of the Dani Alves fan club decided to release some NFTs using digital media they had the rights to, but for which there was no actual affiliation to Dani other than it contained images of him or his clothing during games etc. It has far less reach, it has nothing like the commercial support or influence and its already limited itself to a smaller audience.

Now in both examples above, they would likely both sell their NFTs depending on numbers and advertising/marketing, however, I would wager that Dani Alves would sell put, he would achieve maximum primary sales revenue, his NFts would be seen by more people, resold more often, hold their value to a greater extent and therefore Dani, from the outset will have a far greater success than the guy running the fanclub.

Do you see where the comparison lies here?
I'm delighted we're in with Fanzine but as a commercial opportunity, it makes far more sense to work with people that are the official company/club, who have the resource, the teams, the budget, the experience, the content etc.

And as Sophie says, yes, I would imagine that a contract with a single PL club this year would outstrip what we will make from Fanzine in the first year. Just IMO

Itacon, your last comment makes no sense or relevance to anything talked about before... where have I, at any point, ever, commented on whether or not the world Cup or PL is supported by fans???
It doesn't even sound like you know what you're arguing about here. Do some research, look at the company legals behind Fanzine and you'll soon see that although they have some affiliations to some PL clubs among other sports clubs worldwide, they are simply not the PL. What don't you understand about that?
Now if the PL put out tendering processes (I think it did earlier this year) and somehow we landed that or were a partner of a company that landed that then yes, all of your above comments would have some relevance.

The fact is, Fanzine is a smaller deal at this stage than Mexico unless an aranS comes out to say that Fanzine is going to do more. Work on the facts, not the speculations.
And dare I say it, much though I am happy we have an agreement with Fanzine, it's run by a tiny team and has spread itself across a lot of different clubs and online ventures so I can see why things may take time on their end too.

Itacon, Fanzine isn't the Premier League... it's a collective of websites created by someone who noticed there was a niche for fans who wanted a chat facility and a club facility online. If we had a contract with the Premoer League then it would state we had a contract with the Premier League. You're not comparing apples with apples here.

I can't agree with you more Billy

Half a year Itacon, not a year.
Still, you sound like you have very low amounts of patience. Are you genuinely not happy that in the space of a year, the company has gone from doing nearly nothing to where we are now? To having some piddly contracts to having £multi-million multi-year contract? To having secured a deal with a national team for 3 years? To having deals with monsters the likes of JIO and Huawei? Or having our first major customer sign up for a 6 month deal before promptly extending for another 6 months and for even more money?

I think you're invested here but it sometimes sounds like your literally just out to moan at anything you can get your hands on.

The number off people here that seem not ro understand that signning a partnership doesnt mean a deal gets popped out within a matter of days or even weeks. It was 7 months of work to get JIO over the line and that was working with an app that already existed and with one of the biggest companies on the planet.

Entering the NFT space is completely new to almost all companies and clubs right now so forgive me if I'm happy to be patient and to let them work on it for long enough to ensure it goes right first time.

If anything, I'm quite happy we're likely to be doingexico before the UK. Mexico is way ahead socially and culturally regarding Crypto and NFYs, they've already got a fanbase we know are chomping at the bit for NFTs. Can you imagine if we started in the UK and somehow did a Liverpool or messed up some other way? We'd just never recover. I'm glad Fanzine has taken this long for that reason

Sophie I think you're spot on.

Guz, I have fairly regular comms with the BoD, not so much looking for reassurance personally but it may be asking questions on behalf of folk on Telegram for instance.
One thing I have observed is that with the amount of disinformation and deliberately provocative speculation on this share, I'm not surprised a number of investors have taken to emailing the board regularly for reassurance. There is always going to be specualtion and doubt over things with any AIM company but where there are genuine questions and concerns intertwined with people making things up or deliberately exacerbating the situation, it's never going to sit well with genuine investors. I don't mean that for any of your questions Guz, but some on here as you'll know come out with some outrageous statements.

Clowesbarlow, if you actually research the directors, you'd realise they've either all got other sources of income or have sold companies in the past which likely help fund their lives rather than having to rely on cash out the business here.

Itacon youre jumping around here a wee bit.
The company gave us the cash position when they gave their trading update.
That's relatively close to where we are now. Admittedly they have signed a couple of contracts which likely have reasonably startup costs but it's not like an ATM where you just nip up whenever you like to check your cash balance. I don't know any other AIM company that announces how much they paid for a deal in startup costs and then updates on cash position everything they sign a deal.

My numbers suggest that we are nowhere near needing to raise cash to simply keep the lights on especially as we have shares in Gfin that can be sold if needed as well as what I expect to have been a fair injection of cash via the IGS payment we are assuming was made in the last couple of months.

If the right contract came along and was based in the same model as Mexico or PUMAS and we have demonstrated that it works and makes us money then I wouldn't immediately shoot them down if they needed a little help to start it up. It costs money to make money particularly if you're actively scaling while doing it.

Having said all of this, I still heavily doubt it'll need to go ahead.

Fair enough. Just checking. Each to their own opinions but I'm optimistic about what David can do for us.

Like he's going to tell you that...
Please tell me you know who David Burton is Stuie???

You have to agree though Itacon, there are plenty on here who have refused to contact the BoD or who have clarity issues where this is clearly not the best method of getting that kind of info.
I absolutely vouch for going tonthe BoD of any company directly and MOS is no different. I've never waited longer than a day or two for responses.

Great tweet from the company

https://twitter.com/MobileStreams/status/1562758626619850752?t=XrYdzUgzh6G6cwhP8c5lYA&s=19

Includes PUMAS, Mexico and Fanzine!

Here's to the launch in the next few weeks!

Itacon,
Yourself and others have mentioned on here, telegram, twitter and other sites on a nearlybdaily basis that the website has remained the same. You cannot possibly garner support by claiming it seems suspicious that when you brought it up yesterday, it suddenly gets made inaccessible. If you play the lottery enough, you are bound to win sometimes. This just looks like another attempt to make something out of nothing.

If the website is offline, I would think it is being updated as part of IGS Battleriff but I'm not sure. It's possible it's linked to MosMetaverse as I would expect to see that site also being worked on very shortly if we are expecting to release NFTs in short order.

It would make no sense for that to be the case Clowesbarlow. Not IMO anyway.
The BoD are paid in shares, they have seen some serious dilution since taking the business on 2 years ago (as have us as long term investors) and with everything announced recently, I simply cannot see how the BoD would be withdrawing just now.

Steve, Itacon, I can't say whether or not we're part of the group of companies being viewed as potential for partnerships. But I think a few months is a bit short to be calling it a shocking bit of business. PIs will chop and change every few weeks and months but Nigel strikes me as a long game guy who will not simply be looking to sell here for a small trade of 5%. £250K isn't just pocket money so it makes me think this was meant for a long term investment and I think it's just too early given the volatility of pretty much everything to be calling it a write off or bad business.
Would you have a different opinion if it was worth significantly more? Or if in 2 years it had bagged several times over for us? It only looks bad just now because Gfin is down on its original position but then again, most investments on AIM drop to below original entry at some point before rising above again.

I think the rumour originates from attention seekers guz. If they had a source, even a remote one, they would have posted a link or description like yours. I think it's people just getting kicks from creating rumours.

I've had exactly the same Sophie. Normally a response within 24 hours and normally as detailed an interested as they are allowed to be. Occasionally get the odd question knocked back due to it being sensitive for obvious reasons but I've probably had direct contact with 15-20 BoDs over the years (I've tried with closer to 40) and by a mile, MOS BoD is the most responsive

Perhaps based on the other times he's been meeting with club executives he's felt overdressed...

https://twitter.com/PumasMX/status/1544349287122980864?t=fCCP8qmsKNIUEyBCZXC39A&s=19

Or some of the biggest footballers in the world...
https://twitter.com/MobileStreams/status/1559434791711301633?t=ij7yRzt08avnEMrM3yz6nw&s=19

Old fashioned business owners may lean towards a certain dress code but in modern times, a business owner sees an expert, an innovator and someone who solves problems, for what they are and not for what they're supposed to look like.
I work with businesses every day. The requirement to wear a shirt and tie for their staff both in and out the office is decreasing evermore. Employers and service purchasers realise that ones clothes do not dictate the way one can or cannot help in the scenario.

Expertise is in the head and not in material

I was speaking with Nigel Burton the other day on behalf of some questions posed by the telegram group and he was saying that they are expecting to be able to provide more data to investors in the next few months and to keep that on a more regular basis as time goes on. Livescores should pick up again soon as the South American League opens up (the number of commentators of MOS not being savvy enough to look at annual trends for things like that is frightening). I'd also expect our first 11Wickets updates soon too. Again, another thing confirmed by Nigel was that the version of the app we will be creating and distributing will exclusively be for JIO handset owners rather than those on Apple devices etc. due to the app currently being restricted on JIO devices (I believe due to gambling law in India). Our version will have no element of gambling so they are happy to give us exclusive access to the circa 400M people with JIO devices who are very much aware of the 11Wickets app but currently have no access. From what im aware, these users will previpusly had no access to the app however will be fully aware of its existence due to its popularity on other devices. Think along the lines of Candy Crush not being accessible to Samsung users but then a new version is released which is available to them. The fact it's an immensely popular app already is going to do volumes for the ease of the rollout and PR.

I expect pur NFT sites to go live early Sept, I suspect it will be PUMAS first but it may be Mexico. And I have confidence that due to the nature of NFTs and their tracking through blockchain, the NOMAD won't prevent the company from releasing regular figures for the number of new NFT sales and the number of trades as this should be presented to the company in real time. The fact that traded items generate us income in perpetuity is just mental.

Super pumped about the next 18 months.
My guesstimate is that we'll see small leaps in the SP with additional contracts announced, a larger leap when the Metaverse is released and first NFTs are sold along with first quarterly update and then serious movement towards the end of November after Livescores and 11Wickets updates and then again around New Year when we get the second set of quarterly updates.
If we get any more deals similar to PUMAS that offer long term prospects to bigger fish that might want to buy us out then I would think we'll have offers for the company within 12 months. Personally I hope we don't sell until slightly later than that because the current business model and new contracts will need a bit of time to properly bed in and demonstrate true worth. I'd hate to think we sell ourselves short.

I still plan on holding my full investment until the point we are bought out which I don't expect to be long. I'll also be topping up when I have the ability along the way.

All IMO
GLA.