Member Info for Steady_Aim_Fire

Absolutely it's plausible that so.ething does eventually come with the UFC but acting like it's already a done deal when it hasn't ever been touched upon is false info and completely misleading

Maidit, we're not knocking research. Anyone can spam a page with waffle which is what the above poster is doing. There is absolutely no evidence what so ever nor is there any incling from the BoD even after asking them that we are anywhere near touching, being approached by or onconversatuon with UFC or any Martial Arts body for that matter. If Jemgee had posted actual links with actual ties to our company then I wouldn't be calling them out. But as for now, it's BS and being used to filter false info down to investors.

I don't feel that is something we should be defending particularly when other trolls on the board keep changing their own goalposts for what they expect from the company.

READ THIS CAREFULLY

Stop talking BS and stop spreading rumour. Anyone can read any article and pick what they want but until the company announces something or demonstrates that we are aligning with UFC then you're spreading misinformation. I see you've also only joined the chat here recently which gives you even less credibility.

Case and example, the below discusses Australia Zoo launching green NFTS. Therefore I assume its only going to be a matter of minutes before we announce Steve Irwin as our next face of NFTs.
https://blooloop.com/animals/news/australia-zoo-nft-algorand-green-blockchain/

Jemgee stop talking BS

https://www.ledgerinsights.com/ufc-inks-deals-with-vechain-blockchain-draftkings-for-nfts/

Jemgee, I'm not ruling out any sport but either confirm where you're hearing anything about the UFC or stop spreading rumour.

Love it Silversprings!

Can someone check if Steve D is OK?

Itacon, again, I get that frustration, we've not yet seen the benefits of Krunch (I think purchasing the other half of Krunch was inevitable one way or the other) or the benefits of Gfin yet but I can't deny, I don't think I'd be at ease with the company spending its cash reserve on these deals with the likes of PUMAS and relevant licensing. I feel it was a safer move to raise the cash for that and keep our reserves safe than to risk everything we have in the bank. Just IMO of course.
I don't think it's entirely fair to say the placing has gone or is going nowhere though because we know as per ME in his presentation and on the RNS that the funds were also being used to fund the startup costs for things like PUMAS. If we've had to spend £100K for instance (complete speculation obviously) on getting a deal that, being even pessimistic, makes us $3M over 5 years (forget the potential nearly $15M then I'm completely cool with that. I'd still be cool if it cost us $3-400K as its still a great return on investment provided of course that it gets up and running and we hit targets.

I think that's where the big value NFT tickets will be forged Upside.
Can't remember if it was telegram or ADVFN or twitter or even here but we were surmising that if bog-standard NFT tickets come with exlusive content whether as digital download or virtual presence via the Metaverse, premium NFT tickets come with access to exclusive player interviews in addition to the standard content and then to top level premiere NFT tickets come with experiences like what you've described above, they'll last forever and will make the club money every time they change hands without actually costing the club much in maintenance or organisation because it will be the new norm.

The majority of lower tier benefits will cost minimal in terms of costs to the club and will almost certainly encourage additional fan spend so its a win win for the club and us.

I'm just eager to hear how we get on with the other 30 leads along with whatever Fanzine can produce.

Absolutely Itacon.
I'm hoping that we get direct contact with clubs through Fanzine as I agree it's always better going to the horses mouth and having that relationship there. At the same time, it's possible we wouldn't have the same "in" we have with these clubs through Fanzine if it wasn't for our relationship with Fanzine. Time will tell there I suppose.

Itacon, I agree that it would have been great if we were up and running with a platform for the start of the season however I'm also very much of the opinion that we cannot afford to get it wrong and that rushing it could seriously jeopardise the existing credibility we have with these teams we are chatting to both here via Fanzine and in Mexico. I've seem various digital and online launches (most recently with Battlefield across various consoles and on PC where the game was glitch8ng and bugging out to the point its had one of the worst responses I've seen in a long time and that's from a mega company that should have the resource and knowledge to do better.

One interesting observation though is that there are clearly a number of teams wanting to jump on the Metaverse and NFT bandwagon but only a couple so far have actually done it, they've done it independently and in the only major success I'm aware of, it's because the owners were already expert in the field. I don't actually believe were behind the times when I think of it because if we were, we'd be seeing loads of clubs marketing their NFTs by now. Given that we're likely not the only company trying to do what we're doing, I see this as a good thing because it shows were not behind the curve in that aspect if you get me?

"We already have several long term contractors, but a few more will be added including in Mexico. We don’t need to add employees to make this work"

This was recieved in Mid July from Nigel, after PUMAS was announced.

The response was posted twice in the open group and has been shared here as well.

If anyone has any further questions, please feel free to join the telegram group where we regularly collate questions and ask the BoD, some we get answers to and others we do not if they are containing sensitive info.

Apologies for delay in reply, telegram went down for me.

One of the questions posed in the open telegram group (link below) was aski8ng how we aree structured two manage the increased workload we are getting in for different contracts etc.

I emailed Nigel specifically on the issue and his response was this.

Super article that and it's very reassuring that the research myself and others have done over the past year is shining through. Its a super exciting time for the industry and we're not even started yet

Superb article on what the Premier League and other similar sports events and venues will look like in the future.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-11091287/Heres-Premier-League-match-like-20-years.html?ito=native_share_article-masthead

This is an industry I’m very familiar with and I’ve posted online on numerous occasions about it. Glad to see my theories are not wrong and that the use of VR in the Metaverse, the use of NFTs as tickets with added benefits and the interaction of clubs, players and companies like MOS are all linked for the future.

MOS are already denting the market in South America, I expect big news to come here in short order.
MOS are already partnered with Fanzine and their exclusive rights to a pile of Premier League clubs and more.

Research pays of and although the SP isn’t there yet, there’s a reason that mainstream media are focussing so much on the shift in business and there’s a reason that the biggest companies with the most clued-in brains are throwing £Billions at the sector.

A selection of tweets and threads from January onwards all pointing to the direction of trajectory the business is taking within this rapidly growing sector.

https://twitter.com/steady_aim_fire/status/1484304983055114240?s=21&t=WsFy1ZraiRSCAiN_EQBPIg

https://twitter.com/steady_aim_fire/status/1514151355186823170?s=21&t=WsFy1ZraiRSCAiN_EQBPIg

https://twitter.com/steady_aim_fire/status/1514154043974852608?s=21&t=WsFy1ZraiRSCAiN_EQBPIg

https://twitter.com/steady_aim_fire/status/1534801878978027522?s=21&t=WsFy1ZraiRSCAiN_EQBPIg

https://twitter.com/steady_aim_fire/status/1539918391452000259?s=21&t=WsFy1ZraiRSCAiN_EQBPIg

If your research is solid and the fundamentals are there, back them and be patient. I still think MOS is going to be one of the biggest AIM stories over the coming year or two

Congratulations to City who I see has taken his holding up a notch again.

https://twitter.com/citytilidie66/status/1556913504812208135?t=ROQ3FL5djXDZdRw66FoInQ&s=19

Great confidence in the company and the BoD

For me, it's accumulation all the way here and I don't think it's going to be l9ng before we get more large deals announced.

Not too surprised at the result tonight but it's great to see we've got company reps in attendance at the Barcalona game today.
There's been a real buzz all over Social at todays game and regardless of the result, the PUMAS supporters are clearly die-hard.

I think we're going to do really well here.

https://twitter.com/Steady_AIM_Fire/status/1556361355812380674?t=7zhh0GO-nfXhH5agS9Mwzw&s=19

Great update this morning. Continual growth from last update which was continual growth from the update before.

If this isn't proof of concept for a chunk of the business I don't know what is.

Looking like we'll be profitable at some point this year if PUMAS, JIO, IGS and some of the others do well and that doesn't even include what happens if we get some of these 30 additional contracts or if Fanzine turns into something nice for us.

Really pleased with the update this morning!

A lot of similarities!

You're clearly in the group Scotty and as per my previous comments, debate even if one party is angry, disappointed, frustrated, accusatory etc. Is completely accepted and acknowledged. What isn't accepted is personal attacks on other members of the group or personal attacks on the BoD. Dispute of their methods of management is absolutely fine. There are members there that back their decisions and members that don't hence why I call it debate. Of you're thin-skinned and can't handle negative points being countered by positives or alternative rationale then. If someone brings up a negative that I either agree with or that I can see their side of things, I'll be the first to acknowledge it.
I've even acknowledged before that I agree with Guz on some points of clarity in the way revs are released but I also accept that the BoD have said they won't do it therefore I move on to something more worthwhile.

Evan,
There are plenty of people in that group that openly agree and disagree with actions of MOS BoD, with the posts of City and some of his past statements, with how the company has handled itself etc. If you had the courtesy to look through previous chat in the group, you'd actually see that unless people turn to personal insults, to winding other group members up or trying to cause sh*to, we're actually pretty sensible and a reasonable bunch. If you've got multiple IDs in there already, you'd see that.

It's a place for thought, debate, polls and general sharing of info.

But when we get a twerp joining the group and demanding that we provide you with updates on when the BoD is going to give us announcements, it's just not the qay to go around things. It makes me highly doubt you have multiple profiles in there because you'd know the groups thoughts/stance if you had read messages from before. Claiming that your livening the group up as a guise to trolling is just non sensible and again you'd see the point has been covered on multiple occasions if you read past posts.