Member Info for StanAccy

Oil_beast

Feel free to ignore me, but you can’t ignore the facts.

The financial facts, the behaviours and decisions of NCCL are all plan to see.

Do your research, BUYER BEWARE

Oil_beast

Feel free to go note me, but you can’t ignore the facts.

The financial facts, the behaviours and decisions of NCCL are all plan to see.

Do your research, BUYER BEWARE

BUYER BEWARE

Look at which accounts on this forum are hyping this dead company, the same people who spend most days pumping up and the dumping on fake news and child like understanding of finances.

NCCCL have been dead for a while, there only asset is a dwindling cash reserve due to a CEO who earns a fortune, the same CEO who has delivered nothing to date.

This is arguably a lifestyle company,

The other main share holder Fletcher is fine.
He was sold NCCLs solar project which cost around £3 million to construct for £1 million at the end of last year.
His shares owe him nothing.

So there you have it

A CEO earning I think it’s £240k
And a major investor who has been given the last asset of the company for considerably less than it cost to build.

The only activity left for NCCL is possibly one last share rise to keep the lights on to ensure the CEO can keep the money flowing in for his wages.

The Chinese contractor and Mozambique government both know NCCL is dead

The £20m historic costs which are due to NCCL should the work go ahead are only a small portion of the total cost NCCL must contribute to the project,
even if by a sheer miracle the Chinese change the habit of a life time and want to work with this useless company then NCCL will need to find many millions to finance it from their side.
What does that mean for any buyers? MAJOR SHARE DILLUTION.

AVOID THIS COMPANY AT ALL COSTS.

The Chinese have and they know it’s not long until NCCL run out of cash and they get the project without a useless partner who have nothing to offer.

What are the motivating factors for either scenario?

Bad news and financially it damaged the company for raising funds for future investigations?
It also calls into question the geological approach of the past few years?

Good news consequences?
Can’t release good news because?

When you consider the bad car good news scenario; it’s far more likely to be bad than good.

I think the whole ‘gagging order from a major’ is wishful thinking in some respects. I’m not saying it’s not possible but it’s not likely.
Why would a company limit themselves to one interested party in private when you could share your good news with the world and get more eyeballs and interest on your discovery?

3 RNS so far this week, 3 projects moving forward, 3 more pieces of the portfolio moving toward the end game of joint venture/sale/IPO.

There is a chance with so many of these projects close to where they are spun off for production/sold/IPO we will get a lot of good news within a congested time period and the share price will run up considerably.

As long as POW keeps developing at the current rate each of these prospects, this is a good company to hold and with so many results due in the coming weeks and months it’s an exciting place to hold.

Looking good for golden metal resources future listing; it’s important to have these key early reports and investigation work underway ahead of an IPO, it gives a new small cap real credibility.

Aura still looks too cheap at 15p; can we expect a production take off or joint venture for Tiris by the end of 2022?

It could also be a rocket down to hell if they didn’t find much.

I think we can all expect an announcement by the end of Feb; that gives them a little over 2 weeks.
In my opinion the end of Feb is a reasonable time to expect an update considering the past updates and the stages of the holes at the time.

I am more concerned with the potentially illegal mining risk on our plots which a significant portion of the Chinese miners seem to enjoy.

We would not be the first to suffer from such activity in this region.

Frank3H

Yes, Kal Hourd needs to improve the comms and company financial performance.

Hi Frank3H , I know a bit about the corporate advertising world through a friend who works for one of the majors.

He thinks July is generous that Guild should have a deal with a flagship sponsor done by the end of March or earlier if they have been working on something.

The only other thing he stated was he does not have any clients involved with Esport or as he put it ‘IT’ so he was unable to give a valuation on what a main sponsor deal financially would look like.

This is something that should interest investors and worthy of debate. What have other similar companies with the unique audience Guild can tap into been able to attract? And what do the current Guild deals tell us about what sort of deal we can expect?

One thing worth considering is a company may wish to put the initial spend of the advertising into this current tax year, although the deal may not get announced until early April.

I know a bloke in Botswana although when I asked if he could ‘nip across and see if they are still doing the hole’ he didn’t stop laughing before explaining to be not only how long it would take him to get across but then to actually find the drill site would be like a needle in a haystack.

Needless to say I can be of no further use and will await the RNS.

2 days in a row, 2 decent 07:00 RNS updates , 2 projects moving forward

Wow
Results are unreal, 100 bagger
Or

Shock
Results are so bad, it was all mud in the samples, SP is heading to 1p

I don’t think we will get either, but whatever we get will be an RNS in due course so no value in speculating.

If and it’s a big IF this hole is useless then they will need to go back to the drawing board in terms of the geological methodology as it will be clear there is something a miss.

But again, this is a big IF and purely speculation which helps no one.

As stated earlier, give them until early March to update the market either way.

Hi Frank3h,

I agree with some of your frustrations.
Having a BOD good at spending money is not a good thing; they need to be more skilled at revenue generation and for Guild that starts with a new main sponsor or two.

Guilds spending money to short sponsor Finn Harps football club was a waste; small league, little exposure, meaningless spend.

Guild need a strategy for the academy; they sort of have one but it needs fine tuning to grow revenue.
People in the e sport world and gaming world have an awareness of Guild but they need to push what they offer and the tangible benefits the academy can make to players.
They also need to improve performance at events with good prize money; they have decent gamers they need to focus on the more lucrative games in esport.

And finally sponsorship. Guild has a big audience which traditional advertisers and brands have found it difficult to engage with.
Sponsoring guild with its Beckham links is a big selling point but the board need to be out pushing the brand opportunity or appoint a decent advertising agency who can do it for them.

E sport is a market with lots of potential; lots of growth opportunities and more importantly it’s a younger audience who will be prime spenders over the next 50 off years.

If Guilds board of directors get this right they could build a special flagship company that is a strong brand itself.

The next 3-6 months are huge in terms of evaluating if the CEO is any good.
A failure to bring new sponsors and as such new income and move the company into profit will see a healthy market cap and a company set for further growth.

No new main spot or sponsors by July, no continued growth of the academy and wins at tournaments, etc and this will be a share I will sell at a loss and move on.

That is my interpretation; it’s not make or break. They could employ a new CEO and board if this lot can’t deliver; but I won’t be waiting to find out.

Interesting times and arguably anything around 3p is a bargain if you consider the upsides; equally 3p could be the average for the next few years if the CEO fails.

I can understand why some are frustrated and maybe if given the chance the CEO would have changed what he stated when they were at 400m depth.
Either way as a small investor it’s out of your hands; you either see out the journey or bail if you don’t like the silence.

Personally I don’t see an issue waiting until early March; I expect that’s a fair time frame to expect an update.

Be pleased nothing was announced Friday evening ; that’s when most companies push out bad news.

One thing I must add; if it continues to fall below 5p a share then it’s arguably a time to buy again if you have confidence in the project.

Decent RNS

Not a lot of detail which is understandable so not a lot for a new investor to go on in terms of results but a good signal the company is organised as drilling completed successfully; results heading to the lab; another prospect moving along.

It may take a few weeks to get all the tubes to the lab; then they need to be analysed and recorded; then possibly independently verified if they are commercially attractive.
It could be a few months before POW report on the outcome.

Still it’s a step in the right direction and POW are working the assets not simply sit to my on them or dragging their feet ; this is a good sign of a company wanting to go places.
I have witnessed to many small caps who have 1/6th of the site POW have and yet take over 5 years to move them to anywhere close to production.

Any update on a Friday afternoon after hours is generally bad.
It’s not just bad news per se , it’s bad news for the company as they lose considerable investor confidence.

My research on POW so far has lead me to conclude that POWs approach is unique compared to rivals.
First of all there is no plans to operate; simply obtain, prove and spin off.
Hence the majority of costs are in the mine licensing and investigation works.
Which in turn explains the share price constant fall with the various funding raises throughout the last 2 years.

On a plus note, POW must be in a position (or close) to actually proving and spinning some of these licenses into joint ventures/sales/IPOs.

Then the business becomes self financing to a degree and the share price really takes of.

If just 1 of the 14 is substantial then it’s a game changer for POW; 2 or more and it’s life changing.

It’s now a case of asking are x14 sites any good, what has commercial value and interest, what are the time frames for moving them along?

I think I will buy in as under 1.6p is good value considering what is likely to come along in the next 12 months of the company’s development.

No impatience, simply stating fact.

A main sponsor will move the market cap up considerably ; a few sponsors (which I believe they are planning on) will have this way above its IPO 8p share price.

I expect we will have some movement before April on the sponsor front