Member Info for Ssccss

NU, even if that were the case... Please tell me how these issues are holding up ppp from returning to trading? Because as far as I am aware, ppp have not spelt that out for us.

I am not a shareholder by choice hepran. That's is a very important distinction. We are suspended and I am trapped. I have not voted for any of the changes that have happened since suspension. I still don't know when this is going to return and it's nearly 2 years.

Don't tell me... This is all news to you cos most didn't read the RNS properly.

That's your narrative. I have yet to see evidence of that. It makes no sense to me when he owns 7m shares is it? Also he had a totally legitimate basis on which to bring that case. So I just really don't get your narrative at all.

I'm not a troll hepran. I'm a shareholder like you but with a different perspective.

From what I can see... PPP updated the register before the hearing, so JW didn't lose on that basis. He got to vote at the AGM. There was no point imo to him winning the broader issues. However, these were probably put together before he knew he would get a resolution in terms of having is name put on the register and his rightful voting rights.

I really think most of what happens with ppp goes over your head hepran

Yes but the agm wasn't cancelled and ppp sorted the voting rights. How would it have been fair to have yet another agm with JW owning 6m shares he can't vote with?? Is that democratic??

Please correct me if I'm wrong but I'm getting this from the rns.

His intention was to get his voting rights and his name on the register. Totally reasonable and legitimate.

The other stuff was in response to the fact SL held an AGM while knowing that JW was not allowed to vote even though he owned a lot of shares and would have impacted the vote outcome possibly. That to me is not unreasonable but I guess it's a hassle and seeing as the same resolutions passed this time, it is pointless to do. So makes sense for ppp to win this imo.

The question is would JW have got his shares before this recent agm if he had not gone down this route.

Maybe someone can explain if we still need to meet the 30m mcap to return to trading? Or if that's only after an RTO?

Sorry I forgot, that would prevent you posting abusive messages about me.

Filter me then. Cos I bother to respond to you and then you say something immature like that.

Well that's a strange response NU, cos if my shares become worthless, so will yours. If you do infact have shares.

Shareholders are rightfully fed up. Let us out and then do what you want with the company. We are already informed it will be getting towards 60% dilution and that's before the RTO. We need 30m mcap for main market to return to trading... How is that going to work?

It will soon be pointless returning because my shares will be worth nothing.

I dont subscribe to the whole shareholder versus ppp battle narrative. Jsut get this trading again ASAP. 2 years nearly!!!

Why should I be pleased? Will it make any difference to when this returns to trading? What has this court case got to do with that? It hasn't been made clear to me what is holding ppp return to trading up? I don't care about all this nonsense. I don't like the petty and whining approach of the RNSs. All I want is an RNS which tells me when I can sell my ppp shares. That's it.

*careful about swallowing...

No NU, it's not 2 + 2 = 5.

You don't understand my perspective and you never will. All I'm saying is people should be carefully swallowing all the nonsense on here because nothing is as black and white.

Everyone one should keep an open mind imo. I'm not a fan of TE or DL or SL etc. The only thing I care about is the progress in getting this back trading without diluting us so much it makes it pointless for us to return.

How is it stupid? It's literally in the RNS???