Member Info for Ssccss

If its paper of a legal case then these things happen. Not really sure of your point other than trying to use my argument to dig yourself out of the poop.

You really are in a panic... Even zag has probably cottoned on by now.

NU, I had assumed dsaf might have seen them as he has a relationship with Blomqvist.

It's really not comparable with heprans post about TE and you know that.

Why is it OK for you to repeatedly post allegations against TE? Double standards. I'm not a fan of any of them but at least admit the hypocrisy.

Plus, I don't think you need to expend energy screenshoting things. LSE will have to keep a record of all posts, even those deleted, should they be needed for legal purposes.

On the imo part - maybe follow your own advice. I'm sure those reading may have had their interest piqued as to what you are saying here and how you have that kind of information, or if you are just trying to mislead the board.

"How about cash payments made by xxxx to xxxx via xxxxx to avoid xxxxxx

Some players out there going to be in serious trouble imo"

Go and enjoy the sun.

Done already. You are very efficient. Must be a fantastic and well loved employee.

It's so interesting how extreme your posts become when challenged. Haven't seen anyone else get their knickers in twist.

NU, you don't scare me. Report me. I have done nothing wrong. You however have made all sorts of allegations about me, other posters, previous BOD members... It all has made interesting reading.

At the end of the day, the genuine shareholders are the victims, not the people playing the games.

It's not an allegation NU, I am merely stating my opinion that you come across as knowing more than the average shareholder, much like dsaf does (based on all your posts on here, most of which get deleted because they are abusive).

I apologise that you have taken it so badly. I don't know what you think I was insinuating. I mean to be fair being self-serving seems standard behaviour nowadays.

Anyway, please report me if you feel the need. Presumably, along with the posts others have made in a similar vein.

NU, doesn't really matter what I believe. Situation is out of my hands. Unfortunately, all existing genuine shareholders are at the mercy of wider corrupt/self-serving forces. I don't know exactly the ins and outs but the dynamic is obvious to see. I do hope the details will come to light one day. However, imo you NU are apart of it somehow. It's all very boring now. I'm sure it's going to take a long time to sort out, if ever.

At least dsaf and other posters are honest about their role/relationships and how they have information NU. Shameful.

Hepran, you're the same. Unfortunately, cover blown. Laters.

What is this opinion based on? What information do you have that the rest of us don't? Where can I find it? Or is it simply a case of you posting in a misleading manner to support your narrative?

"Its also a rubbish case anyway and he will lose."

Oh dear. Wonder how posters will feel when they realise they have been taken in. Sometimes you just let it slip don't you... Must be hard for you.

Oh wow. Final nail for you. Backtracking... Lol. Let everything see this.

"Its also a rubbish case anyway and he will lose."

I'm was just wondering if the information is in the public domain. Sounds like it isn't NU? So how do you know then?