Member Info for Ssccss

Omg... I have explained it endlessly!!! I'm sorry you don't understand, but unfortunately it looks like you never will.

Good luck guys. Whichever way it goes, it's not good and I have an awful feeling we will be stuck in this situation come Christmas. I do hope not.

And that was without JW being able to vote, so whatever he does will make an impact and he's not a shorter is he... He's an actual holder lol

Well Spod, if that's the case, how did the special resolution fail last time. Maybe engage your brain and stop lapping up the nonsense posted on here.

Zag, tbf, you have been convinced we would shortly return from suspension since August 2024.

It's a democratic vote.. Well it is now JW can vote. Wasn't so much last time.. Interesting that.

Can anyone explain the 3 RTO suggestion? 3 suspensions? Does anyone understand it or did you all just smile inanely at it?

Casper, I'm sorry but everyone is allowed to vote as they see fit. That is the whole point. You may feel we are incompetent. The feeling is unfortunately mutual, as with most divisive issues.

OK please tell me, I have listened to the call... But please explain why 3 RTOs is better than 1? What is it about that bizarre suggestion that you found encouraging?

How come it's OK for NU to post lies about me but when a news article was posted about RS earlier it was delete very very quickly.

Come on, wake up.

I don't understand your post Casper.

Casper, the whole point is this will not be back trading any time soon irrespective of the vote. Can't you see that?

I have absolutely no association with the TG group, TE, DL or SL, or anyone from PPP, past or present. I am also not a shorter or anything else you can think of to discredit me. I am a shareholder with a significant holding and that's it. Like many who are voting no.

I have absolutely no association with the TG group, TE, DL or SL, or anyone from PPP, past or present. I am also not a shorter or anything else you can think of to discredit me. I am a shareholder with a significant holding and that's it. Like many who are voting no.

I'm sorry but you are just all totally barking up the wrong tree. Maybe don't be so easily led by people on this forum. I have literally spent days looking at this situation and analysing every communication with the company. That's how I made my decision. Most of you probably just follow like sheep.

VIIIJAS, you are way off the mark. I have a significant holding here and I want the best chance of seeing my money back. For me, after all my research and consideration, I have voted accordingly. We are all free to vote as we wish. That is after all the whole point of a vote.

*story

Keep telling yourselves that tidy little sorry... Why would JW vote no? Why would anyone with a large holding vote no? Still haven't figured that out have you. We are trying to get our investments back.

Wayne is speaking absolute sense.

They pretty much said they had been told but hadn't been told ... Which was weird in itself...and made no sense - not to bother applying to return from suspension because they wouldn't get it.. And that they were answering FCA questions in ways that wouldn't support a return?? So now they have Sparks. Couldn't make head nor tail of that particular admission. Contradictory to say the least. No hope whatsoever.