Member Info for Ssccss

In my view, this is not totally independent unfortunately. Would have been more credible to use someone with no prior dealings with any current BOD members IMO. Anyway, let's hope this appointment improves the current situation and helps get to the bottom of what is going on and why we are still not trading.

It depends on how independent is defined. I define it differently to ppp. Independence to me, means no connection to ppp, or anyone related past or present to ppp. I would guess that's the legal definition of independent too but who knows.

Sorry if I'm being dense... But isn't all this the kind of stuff the FCA will be looking into now before a return to trading???

Also, surely the investigation needs to be independent, I. E. The point of the FCA. Unfortunately, the downside of this new appointment is that he is not totally independent ( relationship with Spinks), so that immediately undermines credibility. If they are serious about investigating what has gone on, they need to do it in a watertight way. Why have we not been told what is happening about investigating these issues? Is this what the FCA is looking at? We are in the dark and yet ppp have told us on numerous occasions that there was wrong doing at ppp before suspension.

Let's say the FCA are investigating this wrong doing, then is no one allowed to talk about it? Is that why Spinks can't discuss? But then that is going to take a long, long time, if that is what is holding up a return to trading.

That's such an interesting observation because your posting style has changed since suspension started.

Aha... Is that what you do NU? It's going to be funny when they investigate this forum and you are the biggest culprit.

"Will they now focus only on attacking other posters instead of posting false and made up claims about the company and its directors?"

What a nonsense. The FCA is already involved and they will hopefully deal with whoever is the cause of ppp issues past and present.

That is just not the case at all Jack. We all want as much of our money back as possible. That's why.

You're all nuts. You will literally say anything to deflect the fact you are out of your depth in this situation and you can't keep up with the twists and turns ppp are putting on you.

Haha. Useless.

Did you not listen to the call either Jack? Oh interesting, I guess most people here haven't bothered.

Jack, not shorts. Think a bit harder.

Also please don't exhaust yourself pumping this, better to wait closer to returning from suspension...

Jules, did you even bother to listen to the call? Seeing as you are clueless about the 3 RTOs and now you have responded to my post in a nonsensical way.

As usual though, this won't have been communicated in a willing manner by ppp. Has anyone asked for clarity on what specifically is holding up the return to trading.... Oh that's right apparently RS is not allowed to disclose. Strange imo.

I. E. Some current issues!!! Wakey Wakey

Hepran, if you look very carefully at the rns... It states... "mainly legacy issues". Therefore, using the power of logic, that means there are some non legacy issues preventing a return from suspension.

Who do you guys think you are. Honestly.

You look like fools. You spend your time abusing other posters and patting each other on the back. Lower level of evolution I guess.

Did any of you actually listen to what was said on the call... I also agree ppp won't trade this year regardless of the vote and I have made that judgement after listening to what RS said about returning from suspension.

Yes ii is 7pm today.