RE: New Start15 Dec 2023 17:04
If BMN and Largo had any pricing power or influence don't you think they'd have done something already about increasing prices given the dire state of their current profitability? The reason they haven't is because they have no pricing power. Even Glencore have none in the vanadium market and they're not exactly noted for being a charity when their profits are under threat.
The idea of SPR/BMN being at the forefront of some V pricing authority is for the birds. If they were daft enough to attempt any price collusion (formal or informal) then the US justice department would soon wipe them out. If they throttled back supply it may help prices, but they'd still kill their bottom line and cash flow unless they get sufficient price rises to cover both the loss of sales volumes and the C1 increase per unit. BMNs production misses over the last 2 years are already a form of self-inflicted supply throttle and these have definitely not helped the company finances (or credibility).
CC laid out the impacts of V price changes very clearly. A 10% price change is a $20m EBITDA change based on 2024 production targets and C1 estimates - which presumably also guides the future EBITDA losses if prices fall further rather than rise as we hope and need. He laid out the priorities in terms of production stability, volume increases, capex, and cost control and this is where he'll focus, not on pricing and demand that he can't influence (and certainly not on notions of price collusion that would ruin the company, ruin his reputation, and possibly send him to jail).