Must think - why bother! Why bother upgrading your target by 1p when the previous analysis was based on rubbish. Maybe they want to claim that their analysis was more correct. I have Done the maths and with poo at 62 we are meeting our debt repayments this year and should bring net debt down to around 1500. Then i am interested to see what dc4 and Magnus brings. Dont think they are properly included
Hangon krak - our capex for this year is 275 and Opex is 600. 875 all told and then we have financing of about 150. Over and above is fcf. Moodys predicting 450m with brent at 65.
IF AB does know how to generate money for shareholders. I realise he has a lot of industry experience but he appears to be clueless visavis how to generate returns for shareholders. Disappointed
As stated there does not seem to be a big shorter, no updates to the targets based on the ops update but someone is selling and pushing the price down or at least keeping it in check. Doesnt appear to be a major shareholder so who could it be?
Looking at the website it appears only that baillie gifford is a little below where they should have been at. 94 m rather than 99. Some are slightly above which is positive
I agree doll. I think the market reaction today was very strange. I believe that we could have an ebitda of 800m and remaining 720m on the rcf so quite frankly it makes no sense
I really wonder what is moving this sp. It is apparently not the results but something else. Poo is at a comfort level but the shorters are continuing to short the share. Can't believe that new report as I see that they are still very active today so maybe there are new funds that have stepped up. I am not selling so they can f#¤k off!
I hope that AB has learnt an expensive lesson and that is to not invest in new projects. Magnus looks to be a gem (thankyou BP for saving our skin). Hopefully AB has another Magnus in the offing.
I have to give Minerb right on this one. Again, unfortunately, a case of slight of hand by enquest. Instead of writing what opex will be they state that it will be 600m. With average production of 63k this equates to roughly 26 and with 70k it is 23,5. I simply don't understand why they need to engage in this sort of stuff
I have to give Minerb right on this one. Again, unfortunately, a case of slight of hand by enquest. Instead of writing what opex will be they state that it will be 600m. With average production of 63k this equates to roughly 26 and with 70k it is 23,5. I simply don't understand why they need to engage in this sort of stuff
I have to give Minerb right on this one. Again, unfortunately, a case of slight of hand by enquest. Instead of writing what opex will be they state that it will be 600m. With average production of 63k this equates to roughly 26 and with 70k it is 23,5. I simply don't understand why they need to engage in this sort of stuff
RE: like-for-like production & debt5 Feb 2019 09:43
Great points L3. Indeed with your points the debt would have almost been spot on 1811 that I was calling. As said the devil is always in the details. Deferred Capex is a new concept to grapple with :-).
To your point on the Magnus 100m. This is something I may have missed. Does Enquest get 100M back from BP once they have paid down the vendor loan of 100m or do you mean something else?