Member Info for SpotTheNutters

FOHO !

Haha ! Good one. 😅

Couldn't have timed that statement more imperfectly !

Napthman1

Are you referring to the below ?

_________

Bluejay Mining (now 80 Mile Plc) fires Exploration VP for gross misconduct

Published on 02/09/2024 at 02:29 pm GMT - Modified on 02/09/2024 at 02:30 pm GMT

80 Mile Plc

Bluejay Mining PLC - London-based base metals and gold explorer and developer with projects in Greenland and Finland - Terminates employment of Joshua Hughes, vice president of its Exploration division, due to gross misconduct. Following an investigation, Bluejay Mining found that Hughes had set up a competing business intended to operate in Greenland and, in breach of his employment contract, found that he had misused company confidential and proprietary information in securing exploration licences surrounding the Dundas Titanium project. He also sought to conceal certain of these actions from Bluejay.

Company says: "Bluejay regards these actions as extremely serious and as such intends to take all necessary action, including legal action, as required against Mr Hughes and the competing business he set up, in order to safeguard stakeholder interests."

Ashton

PointlessT2 is as genuine as a £3 note, and it's easy to spot from a thousand paces.😀

PointlessT2

I'll call out an obvious liar and treat them with the contempt they deserve.

Liars generally don't like being called out and you're no exception.

PointlessT2

'I'm still holding' 😂😂😂

Nobody believes that, but if it was true, you'd have to be pretty thick to repeatedly criticise an asset while simultaneously wishing for an increase in it's value.

Thick or just a liar, let the readers decide.

I think it's both in equal measure.

Well, thanks for answering a question that nobody asked.

No s.h.1.t., Sherlock !

That's exactly why they're drilling to determine the extent and size of the petroleum system, that clearly exists due to the evidence of the numerous oil seeps.

Another good article there Greeno.

Thanks for that.

Bid higher than Mid ....

Litt1

Did you really need to ask whether the resident troll writes utter 80110X ? 😀

Spod

It's in complete denial and living in it's own fantasy world of believing it can never be wrong, but being proven wrong time and time again.

At the moment, it's disproven nonsense about oil seeps, is driving it to keep changing the subject, hoping the humiliation gets further and further back in the thread, again chanting 'rampers' (buyers) and 'spikes' (a five month rerate already).

😂

______

As written before to Pointless2.

All of the supposed spikes that you falsely claim you 'took advantage of' all the way down from 15p to 0.25p before the rerate started in September are virtually non-existent in relation to the rerating that's happening now. Anyone can look at the price chart.

Agree Spod

Pointless2 has repeatedly demonstrated that they failed to recognise negative market sentiment for four and a half years from 2021 until September 2025, and has continued to fail to recognise and accept the change to positive market sentiment over the last five months.

I think if they have stock, they hold from 2021, and they're sitting on a huge paper loss, hence the 'spare a thought for the sufferers' line to Ashton but if that were the case, rather than appreciating the start of a recovery in their paper loss over the last five months, they unintelligently and bitterly keep calling a five month positive sentiment and price rise, 'a spike' and those buying the stock 'rampers'.

That's not 'balance', it's just clueless nonsense.

Not a very bright individual at all.

Even the latest nonsense about oil seeps, they write reams of utter drivel.

Here's some more in addition to the Saudi Arabia oil seeps, which are not AI at all. There are articles all over the web.

_______

'A look at the exploration history of the important oil areas of the world proves conclusively that oil and gas seeps gave the first clues to most oil-producing regions. Many great oil fields are the direct result of seepage drilling.'

'Most prolific onshore basins in, for example, Venezuela, Iran, Iraq and central and western US show some surface expressions of petroleum '

Took less than a few minutes, and no AI needed, there are a myriad, but here's just one:

'The discovery of oil by the Anglo-Persian Oil Company at Masjid-i-Sulaiman in the mountains of north-western Persia in 1908; but the consensus of geological opinion at the time was that there was no oil on the Arabian peninsula, although there were rumours of an *** oil seepage at Qatif *** on the eastern seaboard of Al-Ahsa, the eastern province of Arabia.'

Saudi Arabia.

Your armchair 'assessment' belongs in the bin.

Previous post:

"The more technical nature of my recent post simply reflects the fact that I used AI as a research tool to confirm and sharpen my understanding"

Latest post:

"These findings are based on fairly extensive research and are not a figment of my imagination."

__________

The disingenuous contradictions continue.

Why not contact the team of Geologists and Drilling Engineers with decades of Arctic exploration experience, who were present at the drilling site, to let them know that in your opinion, they haven't researched enough using AI ?

🙄

Well, here are the views from real people, not AI.

Expert Geologists and Drilling Engineers.

The Vimeo video when they were visiting the drilling site, with experienced drilling engineers who have decades of Arctic drilling experience.

Https://vimeo.com/1129242924?share=copy&fl=sv&fe=ci

Some of the salient points made in statements from a number of the experts visiting the site, below:

_______

Very confident in those rocks just because its the same geology as the North Sea.

We've seen the oil seeps and we know theres been enough uplift activity.

The uplifting creates more pressure.

After the first well you will have enough information on the sonic velocities in the rock. This very precisely identifies the oil traps.

Its not a question of 'if', its a question of 'when'.

We have oil on top of the water and this is the sign of a potentially large oilfield. In Baku, Azerbaijan ***, there were oil seeps and look at what happened there.

I'm excited to see this, smells like crude.

Arco confirmed that there have been billions of barrels generated on the Jameson Lease.

We know the oils here and we're going to find those oil traps.

_____

*** (Note: Azerbaijan surpassed 15 Billion Barrels of oil production recently) .

Watch the Vimeo video site visit.

They give 50% CoS from memory because of multiple traps, which LItt1 was referring to.

MP

If you're wondering who is likely to be right on the oil, a team of drilling engineers and geologists including Halliburton or an anonymous poster, watch the video about the 80M Jameson Oil Basin Site visit by the Halliburton engineers and others and make your own mind up:

The Vimeo video when they were visiting the drilling site was an enjoyable watch, with experienced drilling engineers who have decades of Arctic drilling experience.

Https://vimeo.com/1129242924?share=copy&fl=sv&fe=ci

Some of the salient points made in statements from a number of the experts visiting the site, below:

_______

Very confident in those rocks just because its the same geology as the North Sea.

We've seen the oil seeps and we know theres been enough uplift activity.

The uplifting creates more pressure.

After the first well you will have enough information on the sonic velocities in the rock. This very precisely identifies the oil traps.

Its not a question of 'if', its a question of 'when'.

We have oil on top of the water and this is the sign of a potentially large oilfield. In Baku, Azerbaijan ***, there were oil seeps and look at what happened there.

I'm excited to see this, smells like crude.

Arco confirmed that there have been billions of barrels generated on the Jameson Lease.

We know the oils here and we're going to find those oil traps.

_____

*** (Note: Azerbaijan surpassed 15 Billion Barrels of oil production recently) .

Gizmo, spot on.

PointlessT2 trying it's best to bring everyone else down it's own level of imbalanced negative tripe.

Just read the Share Talk summary instead.

https://www.share-talk.com/80-mile-plc-and-the-re-rating-of-a-diversified-energy-and-critical-minerals-portfolio/

PointlessT2

Read them and weep.

https://www.share-talk.com/80-mile-plc-and-the-re-rating-of-a-diversified-energy-and-critical-minerals-portfolio/

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2026/01/trump-greenland-landry-us-companies-profit-greenland-energy-swet-price-80mile-kobaldmetals/

Time to get back in your little box full of bitter b.u.l.l.s.h.1.t.

So, now everyone who does a write up on 80M is a 'ramper' or anyone with a positive outlook on 80M is a 'ramper' according to you. Childish rubbish. People invest in a stock because they have an optimistic view of it's future value, which is logical.

The 'spike' and 'ramper' narrative, what a load of nonsense.

This has been gradually rerating for over five months, not a three day spike.

And all of the supposed spikes that you falsely claim you 'took advantage of' all the way down from 15p to 0.25p before the rerate started in September are virtually non-existent in relation to the rerating that's happening now. Anyone can look at the price chart.

You're a con artist living in a bitter and twisted make believe world of your own making. A legend in your own miserable mind.

Trot on !